What Is The Difference Between Sacco And Vanzetti
The case of Sacco and Vanzetti reflected in the fear of communism, immigration and anarchy to all those living in America during the 1920's. As the commentators in the documentary debate whether or not the accusations of Sacco and Vanzetti murdering the payroll master and his guard were fair in this trial and if these two anarchists were guilty or not, I concluded that the aspects of the commentators towards the case was taken in a more personal matter. The narration of this documentary was told subjectively rather than objectively. Considering the fact that this documentary should be objectively told and only state the facts of the trial in which they occurred. All the commentators in this particular film at one point demonstrated some type
…show more content…
America did not view it in this perspective, but rather they saw Italian immigrants as a threat to their society for many of them were believed to be anarchist. These anarchists used violence ,such as bombings against the state, to push for radicalism and for what they believed "society should be like."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Youtube) These actions that took place was what we call today terrorist acts. With the government not knowing exactly who the terrorists were behind these bombings, they simply went into a widespread panic and began arresting everyone who they suspected of being an anarchist. A great deal of Americans declared that "Italian immigrants were different from us. Therefore, because they are different from us, we did not like them."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Youtube) A wide range of people also declared that a structural change was necessary in this country and throughout the world and the "anarchist were the extreme version of that."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Youtube) With the fear of communism spreading across America, they used the time of the red scare as an excuse to suppress all the people they did not want at liberty. It is then that the case of Sacco and Vanzetti was a significant example of "The difference between in what America is supposed to be about and what it has been in certain circumstances."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti.
America did not view it in this perspective, but rather they saw Italian immigrants as a threat to their society for many of them were believed to be anarchist. These anarchists used violence ,such as bombings against the state, to push for radicalism and for what they believed "society should be like."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Youtube) These actions that took place was what we call today terrorist acts. With the government not knowing exactly who the terrorists were behind these bombings, they simply went into a widespread panic and began arresting everyone who they suspected of being an anarchist. A great deal of Americans declared that "Italian immigrants were different from us. Therefore, because they are different from us, we did not like them."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Youtube) A wide range of people also declared that a structural change was necessary in this country and throughout the world and the "anarchist were the extreme version of that."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Youtube) With the fear of communism spreading across America, they used the time of the red scare as an excuse to suppress all the people they did not want at liberty. It is then that the case of Sacco and Vanzetti was a significant example of "The difference between in what America is supposed to be about and what it has been in certain circumstances."(A.H.F Nicola Sacco an Bartolomeo Vanzetti.