Preview

What Is The Death Penalty Morally Wrong?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1923 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Death Penalty Morally Wrong?
1Assessment Task 2: Case Study

The death penalty is still in force in many of countries around the world and in today 's modern society, it has become a highly controversial and debatable topic. Many either stand on the grounds that the death penalty is morally wrong and there are other means of achieving justice, or the opposing argument. These arguments arise from the notion of human dignity. Human dignity is a major factor as execution by the state contradicts the universally recognised fundamental rights as outlined by the United Nations. In relation to this issue, it is vital to examine justice and punishment, as well as the use of force to achieve these, and its compatibility with human dignity. There is a need to take into account
…show more content…
Metz argues that it is degrading to execute human beings period because it erases our entitlement to freedom of speech, right to a fair trial, choice of employment and other liberties. In conjunction, for those that believe in God, it is degrading because their life has a spiritual value bestowed by a higher power. Metz also speaks about how humans have the capacity to form harmonious relationships with one another and how execution by the state should exclude cases of self-defence. Metz 's concept of human dignity definitely reflects the approach of quadrant 1A (ACU, 2013a) which explains, humans have intrinsic worth simply because they are a member of the human species and from a religious point of …show more content…
This is because for every situation, it can be thought of in four different ways. In this case, 1A describes the dignity that humans already have simply because we are human, is not considered because a murderer 's life has value just as anybody else 's life does. By putting he or she to death, it is the same concept as the murderer taking the life of the victim. In quadrant 1B, dignity that humans already have because they are special, including the capacity to reason and freedom. However those possessions are removed from the murderer, in particular, freedom. As for quadrant 2A, dignity is what humans gain or lose through a sense of self-worth, the murderer is likely to have no sense of self-worth as they face the death penalty. Human dignity and the human person is multidimensional, that is, in one way or another, will involve different perspectives in every scenario of a very complex nature. By thinking in only one perspective, we only have one understanding of human dignity and not being able to understand the full potential of being human. Therefore it is important to consider scenarios from the stance of different

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Valbhav Goel, explores the issue of capital punishment through the lens of human rights law and a sociological context. Goel goes on to examine the very nature of capital punishment and explores the barbaric and unethical component attached to the practice. He does so while incorporating the debate of proponents and critics of the death penalty and also looks at trends developing in the past decade in terms of utilization of the death penalty. Goel also explores famous uses of the death penalty such as the Sadaam Hussein execution and whether certain individuals merit the use of capital punishment. This paper can help me establish trends taking place on a global scale with regards to capital punishment while also exploring the legal analysis of the issue of capital punishment and whether it contravenes human rights law as well as international law.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philippa Foot, Emerita Professor of Philosophy at the University of California at Los Angeles, has been studying and writing about the moral implications of killing someone versus letting someone die for many years. She also explains to us the difference between the negative and positive rights of a person and how negative rights and duties are more stringent than positive rights and duties. I shall be looking at this theory and explaining how it applies to certain cases. Before we can discuss these rights and how they apply to these situations, though, we must know what they truly mean.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marquis establishes his argument with the exploration of why killing humans is wrong, in any case. The clear answer, he says, is that killing is wrong because of its "effect on the victim" (Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, 558). Taking one's life deprives the victim of "all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one's future," and this is the greatest loss that any human can suffer (558). This theory of wrongness can account for why it is also wrong to kill infants and young children, whereas other theories that make narrower claims (e.g. "It is prima facie wrong to kill only rational agents) do not stand in such cases.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human rights have existed for thousands of years. Ever since there were people, there were some form of human rights observed by the masses. Although human rights can vary based on tradition and culture and may be constantly changing according to the norm in society, there is now a universal understanding of what human rights are and how they should be observed. One of the many topics relating to human rights that has been of great controversy throughout all of history is capital punishment, or the death penalty. While it was used by all nations in the past and was once a norm in society, civilizations have grown to disagree with the taking of another person's life under any circumstance.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is the killing of a convicted person who has committed a violent and heinous crime. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is determined through a court of law and is not enforced in all states of the United States of America. It is not used in all murder cases, only those who have been convicted of committing atrocious killings (Hood). The death penalty is solely utilized for the cases in which the convict has committed a crime that has made him or her potentially a threat to society. Some of the crimes committed that receive the death penalty in the state of Texas include: multiple murders, planned murder, repeated crimes, and/or rape and murder. The death penalty has been used since the beginning…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Abortion Is Immoral

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As Marquis suggests, the act of killing another innocent human being is morally wrong because deprives that person of a valuable future. He examines why exactly it is wrong to kill us. It is not the brutalization of the one who kills or the great loss others would experience due to our absence. Although it seems adequate, it does not account for killing a person who has no family or anyone that cares for them. What primarily makes killing wrong is its effect on the victim—the greatest loss one can suffer is the loss of one’s own life. This action takes away all of the future experiences, activities, enjoyments and many more things even if they are not valued to that individual now, but they will come to value them later in life. Once killed, one is automatically deprived of all of the value of his or her future. This view that what makes killing wrong is the loss of the victim’s future is supported by two considerations. First, it explains why we regard killing as one of the worst crimes, since it is the most depriving of any other crime. Second, those who are suffering from diseases like AIDS or cancer who know that they are getting closer and closer to death believe that dying is the worst thing that can happen to them, because, once again, it deprives them of a future that they would have otherwise…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is, and always will be a rather complex issue. Mostly because humans are rather complex creatures that have different qualities and attributes that make them unique (Australian Catholic University [ACU], 2015, Section 3.1.2). Therefore, it is difficult to come to one consensus in regard to human dignity. None-the-less, capital punishment is a topic of human dignity that demands acknowledgment and reflection – to ignore the topic would be a violation in human dignity itself. This essay will look at human dignity with in the context of capital punishment, and explain why capital punishment is a critical factor in human dignity. Dignity will be analysed according to David Kirchhoffer’s…

    • 2310 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “For centuries the death penalty, often accompanied by barbarous refinements, has been trying to hold crime in check; yet crime persists.” This was a quote from Albert Camus; he is questioning the death penalty, by declaring that crime rates haven’t decreased. The death penalty is a court sentence of death by execution. To many, the death penalty is right because it protects people from harm. To take one’s life as capital punishment is wrong, we, America should seek new disciplinary actions to stop crime.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human life is a God-given right and a freedom provided by our government; however, mankind selfishly steals that right from their own all too often. The death penalty is a morally acceptable and justifiable punishment for murder. Simply placing someone in prison is not the equivalent to stealing an innocent life. According to Casey Carmical, “The purpose of the death penalty is to bring the murderer to justice and to acknowledge the sanctity and dignity of innocent human life” (Capital Punishment Is Morally Justified). Although abolitionists argue that the death penalty is too expensive and violates human rights, the death penalty does save lives, deter murder rates, and is a morally correct punishment.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The human rights activist argues that the death penalty is inhumane and goes against all human rights. There have been many countries that have abolished the death penalty as Capital Punishment. China, Iran, and Iraq still apply Capital Punishment for political purposes, murder, drug trafficking, adultery, and witchcraft. In total, one hundred forty countries have abolished the death penalty because some criminals are influenced by the police interviewing. They are more likely to give a false statement and because they are ill and don’t understand what happened at the actual crime. Mental health influences 5-10 percent of capital punishment cases. This information is provided by Amnesty…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Advocates of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order,…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays