We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…
The Internet, or the Net, is a global system of interrelated computer networks. This valuable communication medium was created as a product of the Cold War, and it saw its beginning in 1969 as ARPANet, where it was…
I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…
Due to the recent expansions in the availability of technology, the ability to access information has become increasingly more common. This ability to search for information and view content through the internet is currently protected in the United States under a set of laws that are commonly referred to as Net Neutrality regulations. Although many people are unaware of what the concept of net neutrality is, it is understood that the results of any change to current internet regulations would affect have long-lasting effects on all internet users. “Net Neutrality” is a concept that was defined and popularized by Tim Wu, a legal scholar and net neutrality advocate, as being, “the idea that any network traffic… can move from one place to any other place without discrimination” (Lohr 1). Recently, this equal access to content has come under attack by certain groups that would stand to profit from the removal of current net neutrality regulations, such as internet service providers…
According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…
On February 26, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission passed the Title II Net Neutrality rules. These rules will be enforced by the FCC and will protect the American people when it comes to the use of the Internet. Some people say that this is a major part of history because of the way the Internet has changed and enriched lifestyles. Research suggests that Net Neutrality will benefit all Internet users because it protects consumers against blocking of content, prevents throttling of all traffic, prevents favoritism to certain interests, and insures the customer's safety from prioritizing any specific content or traffic. These rules apply to all fixed and wireless internet providers in the United States, and Net Neutrality and its…
What is Net Neutrality? Net neutrality regulates that all content on the internet is treated equally by all internet service providers (ISPs). This both prohibits the banning of any content or service and bars the slowing down of website traffic for particular websites. The Rights of Internet Users…
Net Neutrality is the ability for all information transferred over the internet to be treated equally (Abbruzzese). Net neutrality protects consumers from there Internet service providers to abolish and limit basic rights of the internet. Net neutrality protects these companies…
Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…
A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…
* Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…
The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…
Of particular importance is the deregulation of the telecommunications industry as mentioned in the act ("Implementation of the Telecommunications Act," NTLA). This reflects a new thinking that service providers should not be limited by artificial and now antique regulatory categories but should be permitted to compete with each other in a robust marketplace that contains many diverse participants. Moreover the Act is evidence of governmental commitment to make sure that all citizens have access to advanced communication services at affordable prices through its "universal service" provisions even as competitive markets for the telecommunications industry expand. Prior to passage of this new Act, U.S. federal and state laws and a judicially established consent decree allowed some competition for certain services, most notably among long distance carriers. Universal service for basic telephony was a national objective, but one developed and…
NBN (National Broadband Network) in Australia has wide area and largest infrastructure which has great option for business in public and private sector. With NBN the internet connection is very fast and accurate. With this advantage mobile doctors can easily send data to medical centre for further treatment of patient. By this patients are consuming there time and has fast and easy access with doctors for their better health. Centre has the advantage of delays in treatment for patient. Easy communication in between doctors, specialists and patients.…