Preview

What Is Kant's Duty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Kant's Duty
Kant holds the position that as long as one does not violate the rights of others man is a free agent. Despite this man cannot use his own freedom to destroy himself. Kant believes that it is one’s duty to preserve their life and by willfully taking their life they are doing the opposite of this. This is seen in the quote “The first, not principal, duty of a human being to himself as an animal being is to preserve himself in his animal nature. The contrary to this is willful physical death or killing oneself.”(Kant 1996 p. 176). Another duty Kant mentions that man must abide by is the duty to uphold one’s dignity. By a human being taking their own life they are violating this duty of maintaining their dignity. Moreover, he claims that by committing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this analytical paper I’ll be analyzing a scenario about a five year old girl who is in renal failure and is in need of a kidney transplant. In this the father is the only one compatible with her, but he does not want to donate his kidney to save her life. The scenario will be analyzed through the deontological/Kantian and the consequentialist/utilitarian viewpoints in ethical decision making. It’ll also be analyzed by deciding which perspective would be relevant and a discussion of what I as a doctor would do following the ethical view point of my choice.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Immanuel Kant's excerpt “Groundwork” he explains the difference between acting from duty as well as acting from a selfish view. Kant uses the example of a car dealer or mechanic overcharging an inexperienced purchaser, opposed to keeping a fixed price for everyone so that everyone can be treated as equal. According to Kant the person who does not act from duty does things for their own selfish benefits and reasons. In which the car dealer does since they know that they can take complete advantage of the purchaser.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Kant’s Groundwork an argument he presents is that ethics rely strongly on reason. He emphasizes that this reason can be obtained by every person who seeks acquire it. He explains that moral truths and ethics are not received by deific revelations and motivations but rather by reasoning that make sense to all humans. Thus he stresses that ethics and moral ideals are universal and unconditional. I agree with Kant’s argument to an extent in the aspect that every individual in the world can seek certain ascribed ethical ideals. For example it is perceived in many western countries that it is ethical to be engaged in a monogamous marriage but not a polygamous one. Therefore a woman or man who is in a polygamous…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Groundwork

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The categorical imperative describes Kant’s account for morality’s absolute and unconditional commandment, which dictates rational beings’ moral obligations and duties. From the notion and understanding of a ‘good will’, to that of ‘duty,’ springs out Kant’s three propositions that give rise to the categorical imperative’s first formulation. Through these propositions, the first formulation arrives at the fundamental principle of morality and thus the principle upon a good will must act. It can be read as follows: ‘Act only according to that maxim whereby you can the same time, will that it should become a universal law.’ In order to understand how it is that Kant arrived at this first formulation, first, I will present a close examination and definition of concepts such as ‘good will’ and ‘duty,’ and then analyze how these are incorporated in Kant’s three propositions that arrive at the categorical imperative itself through the explanation of his three propositions. Together with this will be certain limitations I have observed upon close examination of the text in this first section of Kant’s Groundwork.…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poverty is a major problem in the world today. There is so many people living in harsh conditions. As we may ask ourselves about the moral duty on what we are supposed to do. Many of us start to think what our moral responsibility to help other people is. People living with less than 2.50 a day.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems that Kant has a much more conservative view towards lying and when it is permissible. Grotius has a much more liberal, modern, and understanding view on the issue. Kant pretty much thinks that it is one's duty to speak the truth, although this moral principle is not taken unconditionally in the world today. This is a duty because it is every man's right to know the truth and lying to anyone would be taking this right away, which mortals should not have the power to do. However, if a man throws this right away, through committing evil acts that are opposed to the good of mankind, he no longer has a right to the truth and he can be lied to. Also, if a one forces another man to speak, the man has no duty to tell the truth, because…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kantian Perspective Kant

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher lived from 1724 to 1804 and during his lifetime created many theories on ethical conduct and human motivation. Unlike consequentialism which believes the morality of actions depend on the best actual or expected results, Kant believes the morality of our actions has nothing to do with the results but has everything to do with our intentions. For Kant, “it has everything to do with our intentions and reasons for action, those that are embedded within the principles we live by” (Shafer-Landau). According to Kant, moral judgment comes from a person’s own reasoning. When we act, whether or not we achieve what we intend with our actions is sometimes beyond our control and the morality…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandel Issue Of Morality

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is also driven by dignity for others. Murder, along with suicide, was used as an example to explain support the issue. According to Kant and Sandel, the act of committing murder and suicide is morally wrong because it violates the categorical imperative. Instead, it supports the hypothetical imperative, meaning doing something with the intent for something. Sandel concluded that the one commiting the crime is using humanity and failing in respecting it.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant would refer to the categorical imperatives when making his decision. “His first formulation of categorical imperative talks about man being a rational being; since he is a rational being, he has no right to formulate such a maxim like “if I am in a terrible condition, I have the right to take my life or reserve the right to the doctor or my family members”” (Odianosen 9). When talking about Kant, Odianosen clearly agrees and supports that the categorical imperatives point in the direction away from any sort of euthanasia. In this quote that Odianosen uses, he is stating that the rational part of humans shall not call for something as ridicules as euthanasia. Of course Catholics and Kant believe in stopping human euthanasia, but Kant’s peculiar reasoning behind this is quite different from a Catholic’s thought of not disrespecting God’s holy creations. In An Introduction to Catholic Ethics by Longtin and Peach, thoroughly explain that in Kantian ethics, one must follow the moral law for the sake of the moral law itself. This means that one must not use euthanasia not because it may be considered murder and not because it might disrespect God, but because euthanasia in itself is unethical. Since murder is also a universal law, people cannot simply use someone as a means to an end meaning that is euthanasia is wanted mainly because insurance money is given out more quickly. Indeed, although their reasoning may be different, overall Catholics and Kant would…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Death Penalty

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As children we were always taught the golden rule; treat others the way you want to be treated. Immanuel Kant believes in the “eye for an eye” principle. What ever a person does, it should be affiliated to what that person deserves. Kant states, “Accordingly, any undeserved evil that you inflict on someone else among the people is one that you do to yourself” (481). What ever harm you are committing to others, you are committing to yourself with an example he has given, “if you kill him, you kill yourself” (481). To me, this conclusion is very reasonable because it is known that if you carry out a murder, the chances are you may be sentenced to death. Therefore you ARE killing yourself. Likewise, Ernest van den hag believes in the death penalty as well. More so that the fact that deterrence will make people more afraid of committing a murder. People fear death more than anything else in most cases which should bring the homicidal rates down.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Ethical Theory

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fraud is generally defined as an omission of a material fact or a misrepresentation of the truth, intended for personal gain or to cause loss to another party. The act of fraud is most commonly committed in order to deprive another of money, property, or a legal right. Fraud is considered criminal activity, and anyone who is affected by a fraudulent act has the ability to file a lawsuit to collect damages. J.C. Penny was accused of marking up the prices on their products and then discounting them to the original price in order to trick customers into thinking they were receiving heavy discounts and better deals. J.C. Penny committed this act for their own personal gain, and in doing so, they deprived their customers of money that they would…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant On Human Dignity

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Firstly, I believe Kant says that being truthful outweighs any other duties people have to themselves and to the entirety of humanity because he affirms it is morally wrong to damage the dignity of others. Kant argues that all people are born with an intrinsic worth, which he referred to as human dignity. The dignity is acquired from the fact that people are capable of making their own decisions. Kant said that to be human means that people have the power of free choice. However, he also said that to be ethical means to respect the dignity in other people. He believes that people should use their power of free choice to be ethical and protect the dignity of other people by not telling lies. Specifically, Kant’s view is if a people tell lies,…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life in order to release an individual from unbearable suffering or an incurable disease. Euthanasia the word is derived from Ancient Greek, Eu meaning “good” and Thantos meaning “Death” and when combined the term means “Good Death”. Mercy Death by definition is taking a direct action to terminate a person’s life because the person has requested to do so. This also includes physician assisted suicide, not to be confused with suicide which is the taking of one’s life by one’s own hand without assistance. Mercy Killing is also a term used and it refers to someone taking a direct action to terminate a person’s life without the person’s permission. Within this paper I will discuss Immanuel Kant and the utilitarianism ethical theories revolving around the issues of euthanasia.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays