Preview

What Is Interrogation?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Interrogation?
An interview is when a person that is not suspected in a crime is questioned but knows something about the crime or the people involved (Hess & Hess, p. 184). Interviewing is an attempt to solicit information from a witness by using persuasive or congenial methods. It involves gathering information by talking to people and questioning them. At a crime scene, the main sources of information are the witnesses, the victim, and the complainant. In some cases these sources are the same person.
An interrogation is the questioning of a suspect that is directly or indirectly involved in a crime (Hess & Hess, p.184). It is usually more difficult to question a suspect than questioning a witness or a victim. Once the suspect is identified and located, the person can admit to the crime, make a statement, or confess to that crime (Hess & Hess, p. 190). An interrogation is accusatory. Investigators use behavioral methods to determine if the suspect is telling the truth. By using tactics such as using statements instead of asking questions can allow the person to confess.
…show more content…
This right must be known to the suspect before the investigators can question that person. The general meaning and application of the Miranda warning is that once an officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed a crime, that person’s constitutional rights are in jeopardy unless the Miranda warning is given before any questioning (Hess & Hess, p. 191). The term “in custody” is when an officer decides that a suspect is not free to leave, has been arrested, or where there is considerable deprivation of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law enforcement agencies have strategies such as psychological behavior and cognitive behavior in interrogation. Interrogation is a guilt presumptive process focusing mainly on extracting information from suspects. In criminal court they want to collect admissible evidence and charge the defendant with that crime.…

    • 43 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today’s society almost all policemen never forget to read the person under arrest their rights because they know about the Miranda vs Arizona case. I believe that they have put more pressure on the police to say the rights because its a matter of the criminal getting let go because they forgot to read them even if the person already knows their rights. If in case that that does happen I still would not let the criminal go if the case was for something bad or something that would harm…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda never knew he did not have to speak with the police was interrogated and confessed and was sentenced to jail. Later an attorney looked over the case and requested Judicial Review Claiming that Ernesto’s rights has been violated. In 1966 The Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s Conviction, and ruled that if a person is going to be taken in as a suspect they must be informed that they do have a right to and attorney. The suspect also has to be informed that the do not have to speak. The supreme court also ruled that if the suspect is not informed of these right the evidence obtained before hand can not be used in court. These rights are now known as the Miranda rights.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court consolidated four separate court cases with issues concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained during police interrogations. All the defendants in each of these occurrences offered incriminating evidence during interrogations from police and were not notified prior to the interrogations of their rights granted to them under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Miranda was arrested and taken into custody to a police station where he was identified by the witness. He was questioned for 2 hours by officers without being advised of his right to counsel and then signed a statement that said that his confession was voluntary. ISSUE: Whether the government is required to notify the detained individuals of their constitutional rights granted by the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination prior to the individuals being interrogated by the authorities and assistance of counsel and give a voluntary waiver of these rights as a necessary precondition to police questioning and the giving of a…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Janet Ainsworth

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ainsworth shows that this is not the case, as the reading of the Miranda Rights was brought about by the Supreme Court as a compromise to keep the effectiveness of interrogation without violating the rights of the suspect. By making the reading of the Miranda Rights legal and necessary, suspects are made aware of their rights but are not told how to bring them about. This also means that it is incredibly easy for suspects to waive their rights by simply using incorrect wording or even not speaking at all. The reading also serves the purpose of allowing police to interrogate. Of course, the very need for the Miranda Rights suggests that there is an innate injustice in the use of interrogation. This is because of the inherent power dynamic between the police officers and the suspects. Officers hold sway over the suspects and know very well how to use legal language. The typical suspect does not and because of this sense of powerlessness is therefore submissive to the officer, which leads to meek behavior and language. They lack the authority necessary in using legal language to bring about the actions they would require, such as a lawyer, if they even realized they were in need of…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Creation of the Miranda rights has changed the relationship between citizen state and police suspects. Citizens now have the right to be informed and assurance that they will be protected by institutional power. Suspects can now anybody that they had nothing to with it. The Miranda warnings are rights that are not protected by the Constitution. They are simply a precaution to guarantee protection against self –incrimination. Without the Miranda rights, the treatment of criminals would not be fair.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the first class we talked about Miranda Rights. I was surprised to find out that police officers do not always have to read your rights if you get arrested. Police have the right to arrest you under suspicion but police only read you the Miranda Rights only if they start interrogating you. It is not just when they arrest you. I think that I get this notion that we have to be read our rights right after getting arrested stems from pop culture and media.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Upon the case Miranda vs. Arizona the Supreme Court decided that citizens must be aware of their fifth and sixth Amendment rights upon questioning by the police. Fifth Amendment: “…No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” Sixth Amendment: “…In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The Supreme Court created the Miranda warning that a police officer must read to the suspect before questioning if they wish to have the evidence obtained during the questioning used in the court of law. Miranda warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” If the Miranda Warning was not read to the person in custody before questioning, any evidence obtained from the suspect during the questioning shall be…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homicide Detective

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Training required becoming a detective: Like most police officers, homicide detectives must go through a period of training at a police academy or other training institution before they are qualified to work as a police detective. In this training, you would learn things like traffic control, use of firearms, self-defense, first aid and emergency response. You would also be trained in subjects like constitutional law and civil rights. Most detectives begin as patrol officers and work their way up in the police force.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * The most basic process used for information gathering, problem solving, and psychosocial information giving.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interview Techniques

    • 1972 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An interview could be used to justify someone’s opinion on a matter such as in politics when the politicians are interviewed about their policies. Another reason an interview could be carried out is to understand the accountability of a suspect of a crime. A media professional won’t interview every person who commits a crime, but they may be able to get an interview with a high profile suspect. This interview doesn’t have to be used only for crimes. Madeline Macann’s parents have been interviewed many times by the media.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Privilege of Silence

    • 3683 Words
    • 15 Pages

    "Miranda warning" originated from a case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966: an 18-year-old girl was kidnapped and raped, she identified that it was Miranda who did that. The police interrogated Miranda and used his confession as the hearing testimony. After Miranda was convicted he appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the police did not inform him of the right to remain silent, and his confession was concocted under pressure. He said that if he had been told to have a privilege of silence, he would have not made up that confession. After considering all the arguments, the United States Supreme Court ruled the Miranda confession invalid. Because of this jurisprudence, when arresting or interrogating suspects, the police need to say the "Miranda warning" first. This is how the privilege of silence was born in the judicial system.…

    • 3683 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays