“A form of human activity created primarily as an aesthetic expression, especially, but not limited to drawing, painting and sculpture.”
Although the definition of art is not a definition as such, but more of personal preference and interpretation, I believe that whether it be psychological or visionary art, it can not be considered art unless it can be appreciated for the skills of the artist in its aesthetic value and meaning.
Common belief is that art is only considered art when it is on canvas, however art is the title given to a diverse range of creative expression and can be shown in many different ways. In the sense of artistic production, the most obvious examples would be through painting, drawing or even photography, and in a more physical direction, sculpture and architecture. Each area of creativity is vastly different, however they all share a mutual purpose - expression. Implying that the motivation has come from the artist, to make it a memorable experience, drawing the attention, holding that and provoking questions and criticism. Within this I believe that Alphonse Mucha is considered to be a true artist, as his pieces are eye-catching, visually attractive and meaningful. Not only is Mucha a talented artist but he also characterised the movement of the art nouveau style, with his emotive paintings to capture his fascination of the sensuous aspects of female beauty, with his supple artistic skills he creates luxuriously flowing strands of hair and represents the female image as ornamental. In doing this he captures the attention of the observer, engaging them in every aspect of his pieces - the technique, the meaning behind it, what it is representing - and that is the work of a true artist.
What is not Art?
Similarly to the definition of what is art, what is considered to not be art has no definition and is again based on personal taste and interpretation. However this differs to ‘What is Art’ as there is no common...