Preview

What Caused The Shift In Robespierre's Death?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
632 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Caused The Shift In Robespierre's Death?
At first, Robespierre wasn’t that bad of a guy. Supporting the abolition of slavery and opposing the death penalty, he was an eloquent lawyer who just happened to have the bad luck to be born into Revolutionary France. His rise and fall from power can be analyzed in any number of ways, but what I am most curious about is what exactly caused the shift in Robespierre’s mental and emotional state which resulted in the brutal execution of 40,000 of his own citizens. Could he sense the shift? Was he helpless to stop his changing attitudes, so hypnotized by the lure of power that he was willing to do anything to keep it? Or did he know what was taking place, the horrors that he was committing, and did he continue to commit them for his own pleasure? Since he is not alive, killed by the very reign of terror he conceived, I think about it. …show more content…
Someone who watches The Walking Dead and reads 1984 with equal enthusiasm has to be. Imagining fictional worlds filled with fictional people completing fictional actions often intrigues me. Perhaps it is merely a credit to the producers and writers of my favorite shows and books, but I have no trouble whatsoever imagining those worlds as they might exist in the real one we have. I think about how I would react in a zombie apocalypse (I’d hightail it to Canada), or what I would do if I found out that all of established society existed for the purpose of preventing the rise of the living standard for its citizens. My imagination runs up and down and all over the place to the point where sometimes I have to take a step back and wonder how I got where I am. And I love it. How else, I wonder, will the world be improved, than with the innovative and unique ideas of those who dare to dream? With realism, you think, with the viewpoint that some of the world’s problems cannot be fixed, that some are just too complex to be solved with the technology and ideas of today, if they can ever be solved at

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1794 Maximilian Robespierre was experiencing the negative repercussions of his creation. The French revolution changed the order of society and it came with a price. Prince Louis the 14th grandson Louis Capet married at age of 15 years old. The prince lacked of experience and social skills and leadership. The wedding was a political union between Austria and France. Marie Antoniette was 14 years old and was not interested in politics. Four years after the wedding Prince Louis the 14th dies leaving the throne to Prince Louis the 16th. He was not ready for the responsibility; he was only 20 years old.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all,the Jacobin leader ,Robespierre became very paranoid and killed thousands of people at the guillotine.That is to say because he and other people did not like the king so he killed anyone who he thought or heard was a supporter of the king or liked the king.Eventually he started killing anyone who he did not like or looked at him funny.As a result he was executine on jul.27,1794 after the committee of public safety placed him on the guillotine after killing around 40,000 people.Acording to the documents most of the…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed France could achieve a “republic of virtue” only through the use of terror. Robespierre was on the chief architects of the Reign of Terror, which lasted from September 1793 to July 1794. In order to try to bring about this change in government, revolutionary courts conducted hasty trials. Robespierre explained that terror was necessary to achieve the goals of the revolution. During the Reign of Terror, about 300,000 people were arrested and seventeen thousand were executed, all suspected of resisting the revolution.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Robespierre Justified

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Terror that Robespierre helped to instate in France was a policy that was known to be horrific. Even though this ideology was violent in nature, Robespierre thought that it was completely justified. Robespierre made very clear that the interests of the Republic were of utmost importance. He described how there were both internal and external forces working to dismantle the Republic, and that the supporters of the Republic should value reason while the Republic's enemies should experience terror. He made a point that terror in this case was not about intense fear as the word's definition implies, but rather stern justice toward those who did not support his policy. This description embodied Robespierre's concept on terror during this time,…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1789, his priority was protecting and defending the people of the third estate. Robespierre often aggressively expressed his revolutionary beliefs to the public, which made him appear as a radical democrat. These speeches caught the eye of a radical political party, the Jacobins, who later welcomed Robespierre into their group. As the constitution was being written, Robespierre was elected a member of the National Convention to represent Paris, where he was a spokesman for the Jacobins. While a member of the Convention, he was inducted into the Committee of Public safety, which oversaw the French government and protected it from its enemies. Tension quickly rose between the revolutionaries and the anti-revolutionaries in France, which sparked a civil war. In the midst of this, the King and Queen tried to escape France as they thought their lives were threatened. When their attempt failed, they were tried for treason then later executed. Through the power Robespierre was given from being a Jacobin, he became the leader of the Committee of Public Safety and soon after, the Dictator of France. Robespierre first decided to end the wars, and by doing so he would establish a “Republic of Virtue”, or a Republic of ethics and morals. He planned on doing this by eliminating anyone who opposed the French Revolution. This period of bloodshed was later the called Reign of Terror because of the ~40,000 people who were executed by guillotine. The Terror produced major success, which made Robespierre want to continue it, even though the incentive was gone. ~85% of the victims from the Terror were peasants, who were the original beneficiaries of the French Revolution. The Jacobins and others from the National Convention all voted for Robespierre’s arrest and execution after they realized what Robespierre had done. The leader of the Terror…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The convention tried and executed Louis XVI by beheading him, but this only made France’s enemies more angry. Therefore, Maximilien Robespierre and his followers took control. After, Robespierre was killed it then changed into a military dictatorship. During this revolution, people’s rights increased as the government changed to a constitutional…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Midterm Exam Mardin Shinoo Professor Michael W. Johnson Revolutions in History North Park University Chicago, Illinois October 2014 Tennis Court Oath was an agreement proposed by Jean-Joseph Mounier on June 20, 1789. As part of the third estate, they were locked out of the usual meting hall and suspected that the king wanted them to disband. They took an oath to never separate until there was a written constitution was established for France. Humanism was a Renaissance cultural movement from the 1400s to the mid 1600s.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the discontent of the bourgeoisie class would have been insufficient to elevate the Revolution to the new degree of barbarity that was witnessed over the years of 1789-1792. Instead, it is accountable to the continually expanding influence of the Revolution and its effect on a range of social classes. In retrospect, the lividness and passion evoked from the rioting sans culottes and bourgeoisie suggested that violence was the most accessible way for a diverse range of French citizens to partake in the revolution. By utilizing violence, we can witnessa “domino effect” concerning the spreading grasp of Revolutionary fervor. The intellectual resistance typifying the revolt of the nobles would rapidly spread to the bourgeoisie, popular movement, and eventual peasant classes. In this chain of events depicting the spread of the Revolution, we can also witness a gradual loss of civility and increasing use of violence. By the time that Revolutionary zeal had spread to the peasants, the March to Bastille ignited into an unprecedented display of riotous passion. Due to his own ineptitude and the accelerating popularity of the Revolution,…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, he also had radical ideas that were appalling and that weren't necessarily correct. In his opinion, the people should be lead by reason and the people's enemies by terror. Robespierre also mentions that a popular government in revolution evolves from virtue and terror. This is his outlook on virtue and terror: "virtue, without terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless." He says, "the characteristic of popular government is confidence in the people and severity towards itself." In other words, the popular government has to have confidence in the people and be strict and severe with itself. According to him, terror is the principle of despotic government and he thinks that because of this, the despot may govern by terror his brutalized subjects and subdue by terror the enemies of liberty. Even though these are only his opinions, his perspectives on the use of terror and ruthlessness led him to cause the Reign of Terror and ultimately led him to his execution on July 28, 1794. A revolution doesn't necessarily have to include terror and the popular government does not have to be ruthless to its people, because then the revolutionaries may lose their supporters (or they may even revolt) and the radicals might have to face more…

    • 366 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crimes people were kill for were ridiculous. A simple cry for your husband’s death could get you the punishment of having to sit for hours under the blade which shed upon you the blood of your husband, then you would be killed yourself. Mass numbers of people were killed, over 2,500 people in Paris alone. Tens of thousands in other cities and town throughout France. Robespierre and his cohorts initiated the “Reign of Terror”, which lasted just less than a year. This was the worst part of the revolution, too many innocent people died, this is why they (Louis and Marie) were guillotined and were the last official King and Queen of France. A king and Queen had never in history ever been guillotined by their own people. The…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The promises of the Declaration of the Rights of Man were forgotten. Terror was the order of the day. In the words of Maximilien Robespierre, "Softness to traitors will destroy us all" (“History Wiz”). He promoted violence and used his power to force the others in following him by means of fear. The old saying “the end justifies the means” could easily be applied to Robespierre’s theories. Even though his reasoning’s seem irrational, immoral, and unfair he truly believed it would solve France’s problems. In a speech to the National Convention Robespierre further explained how terror would lead to a republic of virtue. “If the spring of popular government in time of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror: virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless.”…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the moderate phase King Louis’s political power was altered from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, but during the radical phase is where that all fell apart. In a period ruled with the violence, fear, and dictatorship of Robespierre. The first event that shows this theme is the “Reign of Terror.” This event relates to the theme of fear and violence since Robespierre's goal was to inflict fear on others in hopes of having them listen to him. The Reign of Terror was the time period in which Maximilien Robespierre assumed control after the execution of King Louis. The terror was created to kill off people who opposed the Revolution and to also stop a counter revolution. In Robespierre's speech he addressed to the French…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    reality: a hyperreal…It is no longer a question of imitation, nor duplication, nor even parody. It is a question of substituting the signs of the real for the real”. (Simulacra and Simulations).…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man of La Mancha

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although some instances in life require seriousness, an idealistic vision of the world is an important aspect as well. We all know how life goes. Some days we feel as happy as a clam. Other days, well, let’s just say we can’t wait for tomorrow to come. Now, those are the kinds of days in which an imaginary view of the world might come in handy.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre states, “What is the goal toward which we are heading? The peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality.” (Bienvenu, p. 1, para.1) The laws that have been passed by the royalty that are meant to bring long lasting righteousness, are laws that are recognized; these laws are not written any where but in the essence of all individuals. Robespierre was elected as the representative of the National Convention and joined a political club called the radical Jacobin party. Being apart of the Convention and the Jacobins, Robespierre took over the administrative power of the Republic. Because the Jacobins believed that France was in need of change and restructuring, and Robespierre was now the head of the Convention, he can develop such change. By doing so he argues that in the land, the use of ethics must be replaced with the use of pride, proposition for traditions, self-regard for arrogance, magnificence for narcissism, prestige for money, and immorality of the sovereign for virtues and the phenomenon. He believed in democracy and the Republic of virtue. He felt that in order to set the basis of democracy within the people, the merge of both ending the war of independence and oppression must take place in order to put an end to the revolt. The essences of the Republic are virtue and equality. He explains how it is the development of virtue and the maintenance of equality that creates the Republic. Therefore, it is embraced or founded by an individual. He believed that the quality of being an admired government would be an advantage in gaining the trust of the citizens in order to create a strict and rigorous government, “…be trustful towards the people and severe towards itself.” (Bienvenu, p. 2, para. 2) Robespierre states the strengths and weaknesses of this theory: the strength being the triumph of truth rather than dishonesty, and the rights of the community’s interests than the private. The purpose…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays