Preview

What Argument Does Crito Use to Convince Socrates to Leave??

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
389 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Argument Does Crito Use to Convince Socrates to Leave??
What argument does Crito use to convince Socrates to leave??

Crito and some of his friends were willing to pay informants to keep whatever knowledge of Socrates escape secret. He also gave him the option of staying in Thessaly, and he assured him that he wouldn't be harmed there. The main argument that Crito used in trying to convince Socrates, was by saying that in not trying to escape he would be betraying his own sons by going away and leaving them, and not educating them on what he knows. He called Socrates a coward for choosing the easiest way out, by not putting up a fight in the courtroom and also by just basically accepting his "fate" of being sentenced to death. I believe that this "act" really exposes Socrates as a coward and a fool. Firstly I call him a coward, because to me he is to shame to admit that he could possibly wrong. He makes absolutely ridiculous points in trying to defend his actions. He came up with a totally hypothetical situation in which he gets caught by the guards, and he came to the conclusion, that by escaping he would be disobeying his parents, also those who brought him up. My problem with his conclusion, is that he spent a lot of his life disobeying and questioning everything he was thought, without any fear and all of a sudden he's afraid of the consequences of being caught, and he already has been sentenced to the ultimate penalty, death. I call him a fool also because I believe that Crito is right when he said that he would be betraying his sons if he didn't try to escape. His reasoning that his kids being orphans should be on the conscious of the people that put him to death is highly irrational. What man would not make an effort to see about that well being of his children? Socrates could possibly be the world's first dead beat dad. Socrates to me is a man who talks the talk and cannot walk the walk. He holds himself in such high esteem over everyone else for no reason. Who boasts about not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito Worksheet

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. In paragraphs 43-46a, Crito gives Socrates a number of reasons why he should escape. State one of them in your own words. He will be killed un-honorably.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In making his decision on whether or not he should willingly be drafted or evade the draft, he remembers Socrates. He does not believe in the war. He writes, “I was persuaded then and I am persuaded now that the war was wrong” (O’Brien 18). When he goes to war, he does not go feeling confident and justified in what he was fighting for. Regardless, he remembers the feelings of Socrates when he was put to death by his country. His friend Crito wanted him to try to escape his jail cell, and live a long happy life on an island. Crito wants this for him because Socrates was wrongly being put to death. However, Socrates refuses to go because he cannot turn his back on his country. He has lived in his country for his whole life, where he ate, drank,…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The teachings of Socrates in Plato’s The Five Dialogues provide an answer to the dilemma of the portly fella. The book of Crito portrays the scene of Socrates in his jail cell awaiting execution when he’s approached by an old friend, Crito, a philosopher and nobleman with sufficient funds to help Socrates escape from his prison cell. Crito repeatedly argues with Socrates in an attempt to convince him to flee his cell. The first argument that Crito presents is his argument of reputation in which he states, “Surely there can be no worse reputation than to value money more highly than one’s friends, for the majority will not believe that you yourself were not willing to leave prison while we were eager for you to do so.” Crito is essentially saying that that people will think that Crito chose his money over saving Socrates to which Socrates simply rebuts, “My good Crito, why should we care so much for what the majority think? The most reasonable people, to whom one should pay more attention, will believe that things were done as they were done” (Plato, Five Dialogues; Crito: pg. 47). Effectively Socrates is saying that Crito shouldn’t concern himself with the majority but with the reasonable because the reasonable see it the way it is. Crito then responds saying that the majority has the power to inflict the greatest evils, which in this case is death for Socrates, “You see Socrates, that one must also pay attention to the opinion of the majority. Your present situation makes clear that the majority can inflict not the least but pretty well the greatest evils if one is slandered among them” (Plato, Five Dialogues; Crito: pg. 47). In the portly fella case, you must be reasonable, and the reasonable thing is to not push the portly fella onto the tracks. A reasonable person wouldn’t even think to murder somebody in order save others, especially when you share no association with the other…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crito

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crito doesn’t want Socrates to be prosecuted because he thinks that whole trial thing was just absurd. He tells Socrates that he can continue living and sharing his knowledge in another place and can help his sons.…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato's "Crito", another personality trait that Socrates displays is a sense of self-infatuation. In his discussion with Crito, they gloss over the escape plan they have arranged so that Socrates cans sneakily make his exit from prison. When delving into the worst-case scenarios that can play out, Socrates asks, " Is it fair enough that one should not value every human opinion but only some and not others? And not the opinions of everyone but of some and not others? What do you say? Isn’t this…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Crito, Plato introduces several arguments that Socrates makes on whether or not it would be just for him to escape from prison when the Athenians have not acquitted him. Socrates begins by arguing that one must never do wrong. One of the most compelling arguments that he goes on to make is that doing harm to someone is wrong and therefore one must never engage in retaliatory harm. Under certain circumstances, such as self-defense, retaliatory harm is necessary. Socrates also argues that whenever you violate an agreement, you harm the person you made the agreement with. Therefore, escaping is wrong. In this paper, I shall argue that although the arguments support…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Crito," Plato uses Socrates as a tool to argue the point. Socrates is in jail for "preaching false gods" and "corrupting the youth" by causing them to doubt or disregard the wisdom of their…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that Socrates has made the absolute most just decision with everything he could have done. It still remains remarkable to me that he had turned down such an easy and pleasant life of exile to take on his execution that he is innocent for. Although it seems like such a hard thing to pass on, I know I would have done the exact same thing after some deep thought about how it would impact myself along with the rest of the community. I fully stand behind Socrates’ decision by staying in prison and taking on his…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Crito, Socrates and one of his followers, Crito, discuss the opinion of the “majority” and its effects on Socrates’ current situation. Crito first assumes that Socrates should care about the majority opinion, especially in his current case because “the majority can do not just minor harms but the very worst things to someone who’s been slandered in front of them” (44d). Socrates responds and dismisses the possibility of the majority having an unlimited capacity for doing harm. He explains by asserting, “they cannot make a man either wise or foolish, but they can inflict things haphazardly” (47). The point Socrates portrays to Crito is that the “majority” acts without knowledge and merely follow their own feelings. The accidental or rather unconscious character of these personal feelings is what causes the majority to act haphazardly. The real harm being done within “the majority” is the act of being foolish rather than the real good of being wise. Socrates expresses, however, that the majority is unable to do either. “I only wish, Crito, that the majority could do the very worst things, then they might also be able to do the very best ones- and everything would be fine” (44d). He further explains that the truth is, the majority cannot do either of these because they do not have the capability of making someone either wise or unwise. The effects, then, that the majority produces “are really the result of chance” (44d). The good man cannot be harmed by the bad precisely because his goodness consists in his not allowing others to make him foolish.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though Socrates is proven guilty he has no regrets. He believes he did nothing wrong and is happy to share his knowledge with people. Socrates says, “is not to avoid death but to avoid unrighteousness.”(168-169) In this he is saying he is not upset about dying and he did the right in life. Again he shows this is true when he says, “I would rather die having spoken after my manner, than speak in your manner of life.”(163) He’s saying again he did the right thing and rather die than not have shared his knowledge and be a wise man. Socrates makes it clear he did the right thing in life, at least what he thinks the right thing is. He wants to help people in his life and succeeded in doing so, so he is not afraid of death. He is smart and wise and wants to keep teaching his knowledge. He states this when he says “ You will not easily find another like me, and therefore I advise you to spare me.”(110-111) Socrates makes it clear teaching his believes was obviously not a crime and has no regrets of doing so.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology Analysis

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher, mathematician, and pupil of the philosopher Socrates, relays his interpretation of Socrates’ defence against the Athenian council in, An Excerpt from Plato’s Apology. In the writings, (which may be biased being as Plato was an admirer of Socrates), Socrates attempts to dispel the charges laid against him. Throughout the excerpt, there is much acknowledgement surronding the scuttlebut in cirulation emcompassing Socrates, why and how he earned he vile names, his everlasting support of philosophical studies, and the importance of finding and improving the sole. All developing the thesis of Socrates’ attempt to prove that he is not a conceited, boastful philosopher but in reality there is a method to his madness.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Arguments Crito

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates chats with his wealthy friend Crito, who after bribing a guard, offers to help Socrates escape…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Plato’s Trial and Death of Socrates, the value of piety and justice is emphasized repeatedly. To Socrates, it is never valid to knowingly commit an unjust action, as it does more harm than good. In other words, the most important thing in life is a good life that maintains the health of the body and psyche. Therefore, after failing to be acquitted from his trial, he must now determine whether it is just or unjust to escape without the approval of fellow Athenians. In his examination of possible liberation, Socrates rationalizes with Crito as to why he believes escaping does no justice for his psyche, or the city. He eventually personifies the law of Athens, talking in the voice of the law, to reason with Crito, and with himself, as to why…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays