Preview

What Are The Two Tiers Of Speech Protected

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Two Tiers Of Speech Protected
When the colonies declared their independence they wanted to have a form of document that tied them together as a whole nation, to give them a kind of governmental structure. They quickly came up with the Articles of Confederation, which was not meant to be permanent. It was a temporary document so the colonies could say they had come together as a nation.
As a quick fix to big problem the Article of Confederation soon became inadequate. The federal government had little power, it was a congress made of people who were just delegates of the state. The states practically retained all the power they would have without a government. There was no way for congress to enforce what they wanted. Each state had its own form of currency so in order to do business between states you had to keep track of exchange rates. Each state built their own roads so in order to
…show more content…
If it is not provocative or dangerous, political speech is vital in democracy. Other forms of speech that are highly protected are symbolic speech, speech plus, assembly, and petition. The Supreme Court has created two tiers of speech protection in the United States. One tier is speech that is not protected and the second tier would be speech that is generally protected. These two tiers allow the court to more clearly establish guidelines and criteria for acceptable free speech. The types of free speech that have received lower levels of constitutional protection than political speech include libel and slander, obscenity and fighting words. Slander and libel are false written or spoken statements intended to harm a person’s reputation. Obscenity is speech which is not protected due to its vulgar nature and fighting words are not protected because they constitute a threat to public safety. All of these categories of speech represent a breakdown in public order and as such the court has not shown a willingness to protect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court keyed the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech, under the first amendment. In finalizing the conviction of a man accused with disturbing the peace by handing out provocative flyers to draftees of the war, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that in certain ways, words can create a “clear and present danger” in a way that Congress may constitutionally disallow. While the decision has since been overturned, Schenck is still a major point in creating context-based balancing tests used in reviewing Freedom of Speech challenges.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the system by which America was run from 1777-1788. When it was run by the Articles, America was weak and it was mocked by the countries of the world. While the Articles of Confederation had some strengths, the number of weaknesses greatly outweighed them. The ratification of the Constitution in 1788 helped to alleviate most of these problems. Even though there weren't many strengths, the Articles solved some major problems, including the distribution of western lands. There were many weaknesses that the government tried to solve, such as repayment of debt, but the Articles couldn't enforce tax collection. The Constitution, written because of weak central power, helped solve many of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The government under the Articles had so few strengths because the people were afraid of a strong central government.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was written in 1777 and became operational in 1781. It put an emphasis on state rights. Without an executive branch or judicial branch the central government was run by a Congress. This Congress was unicameral, meaning it was a single branch; there was no House of Representatives or Senate. Each state got a single vote in Congress. In order to create major legislation you needed at least 3/4 vote and a unanimous vote to amend. With the Articles the government had little to no power. Without enough federal power, the states adopted the Articles of Confederation and went out on their own again seeking to help only themselves. The Articles stated that the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major problem of decentralized powers under the Articles of Confederation is that there was no national currency. Each state had a different type of currency that could only be used in that state. For example, money in maryland could not be used in virginia and sometimes even had a different value. The Constitution created a national standard and a National Bank to solve this problem. Another problem of decentralized powers is that the Aticles of Confederation had a unicameral legislature, which meant no power check. The three branches of government could not hold any sort of power over the other so it opporated more like three separate functions rather than one government for the people. The newly created bicameral legislature took care of this problem in the Constitution. A third problem was that congress had no ability to tax. After the Constitution was passed, congress could tax and therefore could have money to fund things like job creation and war.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    articles of confederation

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was useless in the area of foreign relations. Under the Articles, most power belonged to the states, and many states carried out their own relations with foreign countries. The federal government had no power to regulate or make laws regarding commerce, which undermined the economic relations with other countries. The federal government could not produce or regulate currency, which hurt commerce with other nations, and even between the states themselves. The government under the Articles of Confederation did not have the power to tax, and therefore could not finance any sort of national defense. The US was unable to defend itself. For instance, the United States still had border disputes as well as disputes about British soldiers on US soil that it could do nothing about. The failure of the Articles of Confederation to manage foreign relations illustrated the disadvantages of a weak central government.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Articles of Confederation provided for a loose confederation or “firm league of friendship.” Unfortunately a clumsy Congress was the at the helm of the ship that was America. The Articles put no executive branch into place because King George III left unpleasant memories to the new independent states. Although Congress was dominant, it was severely impaired due to its limitations. The Articles of Confederation added to the financial problems, could do nothing to alleviate domestic problems, was unable to deal with diplomatic problems, and caused commercial problems both at home and…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to David Schultz (2013) the Constitution does rule out corporations to be persons. Therefore, why would one think that corporations are persons entitled to Constitutional protection? Previously slaves were not considered persons in 1857 with the Dred Scott v. Sanford (Shultz, 2013). Also in 1971, Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court did not define the fetus as a person (Shultz, 2013) . However, in 1886 in County of Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, the Supreme Court accepted that corporations were persons for purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment (Shultz, 2013). On one side, corporations have due process rights and cannot be searched without a warrant but corporations have no privileges against self-incrimination. The government has greater leeway to regulate corporate speech. In 2010, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that efforts to prevent corporations from spending money for political purposes violated first amendment rights (Shultz, 2013).…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While some believe freedom of speech violates the rights of others, it’s the main fundamental amendment people use nowadays. Included in the the First Amendment is freedom of speech which protect the citizens free expression. Freedom of speech let’s a citizen speak or express their own mind and opinion.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limited Protected Speech

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Limited protected speech, cannot be banned by the government, but is subjected to time, place and manner restrictions. There are several forms of limited speech, but two major forms are offensive and commercial speech. Offensive speech, not to be confused with obscene speech, is speech that offends a large population of society, it cannot be banned by the government, but is placed under time, place, and manner restrictions to protect the population that is offended by the speech (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 96). Examples of these types of restrictions…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Speech vs Hate Speech

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Freedom of speech is instilled at the beginning of the Bill of Rights and it allows citizens of the United States to express their opinions without being afraid of what might happen to them, much like in other countries. Many times people are directly or indirectly harmed by others’ actions that are considered a right under the freedom of speech clause. Though, some people worry that if we do not allow for complete freedom of speech, it is hard to figure out what the limits are. So how can we distinguish between what is covered under our freedom of speech right and what is not if there are no limits? Freedom of speech is a constitutional right given to every citizen, entitling them to voice their opinion however they see fit. However, in order to be protected in schools and businesses, many boundaries have been placed on free speech in order to regulate harmful hate speech. However, this comes with a disadvantage, people are supposed to be protected from harmful hate speech in schools and businesses; actions are taken to protect this, though, other factors of free speech are taken away when what is considered harmful and what is not can not be distinguished.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The freedom of speech is a very powerful right that is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Our Founding Fathers set the stage when they wrote the Declaration of Independence by stating that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” (Choices, 81). One of these liberties and unalienable rights was the Freedom of speech. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was ratified in December 15, 1791, states that:…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Speech

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States states in its First Amendment that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (Funk & Wagnalls 162). This Amendment guarantees each person of free speech. Does this mean that a person can stand in the middle of the street and yell anything he wants? No, society, even though it cherishes freedom of speech, does give this freedom certain restrictions.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Speech

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Congress shall make no law ...abridging the freedom of speech”. From the nation’s dawn freedom of speech has been an important right. Many examples of free speech include people being allowed to protest wars to people disagreeing what type of ice cream is best; free speech allows us to be a democracy. The debate lies between the values of free speech and autonomy against utilitarianism and unity. The absolution of free speech under current federal judicial precedence is necessary for a just society.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Freedom of Speech

    • 10825 Words
    • 44 Pages

    Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, sedition (including, for example inciting ethnic hatred), copyright violation, revelation of information that is classified or otherwise.…

    • 10825 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of Speech

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With varying opinions and beliefs, our society needs to have unlimited freedom to speak about any and everything that concerns us in order to continually improve our society. Those free speech variables would be speech that creates a positive, and not negative, scenario in both long-terms and short-terms. Dictionary defines Freedom of Speech as, “the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc.” Freedom of speech is also known as free speech or freedom of expression. Freedom of speech is also known as freedom of expression because a person’s beliefs and thoughts can also be expressed in other ways other than speech. These ways could be art, writings, songs, and other forms of expression. If speaking freely and expressing ourselves freely is supposed to be without any consequence, then why are there constant law suits and consequences for people who do. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression should be exactly what they mean.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays