Preview

Free Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Free Speech
Free Speech
“Congress shall make no law ...abridging the freedom of speech”. From the nation’s dawn freedom of speech has been an important right. Many examples of free speech include people being allowed to protest wars to people disagreeing what type of ice cream is best; free speech allows us to be a democracy. The debate lies between the values of free speech and autonomy against utilitarianism and unity. The absolution of free speech under current federal judicial precedence is necessary for a just society.
In America, there are a few different types of speech that is not protected under the US Constitution, the first being Subversive Advocacy. As explained by Leora Harpaz, professor at Western New England University of Law, “advocacy directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and (2) speech that is likely to incite of produce such action”. Examples of this include speeches that start a riot, and speeches that incite general criminality. The purpose of subversive advocacy is to promote safety in our society by limiting speech that could threaten the value. Correspondingly, fighting words, as explained by Cornell Law school, one of the premier law schools in the country, “Words which would likely make the person whom they are addressed commit an act of violence.” Again the value of limiting this speech is to protect
…show more content…
Through an article about Campus Hate Speech Codes posted by Gerald Uelmen, he says “Censorship is only one example of how hate speech codes undercut the benefits of higher education. If these codes shield students from dissenting opinions, how will they learn to respond to such opinions after they graduate?” If a student is expected by others to know how to deal with hate speech, how can he learn if there is nothing to learn from? In order to teach students values we need hate speech protected by law, so they can see it first

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the United States of America and in almost all countries, there are laws against harassment, libel, threats, and incitement to commit crimes. These speech codes are for the safety of citizens and are often used to suppress hate speech in private institutions and in the workplace. Speech codes should be allowed on college campuses in order to create a safe environment for people of different sexes, races, sexual orientation, religions, and classes, and to provide an equal learning environment for all by limiting the freedom of speech.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For anyone to place a limit on an American's right to express or suspend one's right's, is to be very dubious in being an American themselves! "Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." (John Milton, 1644) in that quote, Senator Robert M. La Follette uses it to defend his right to speak out against the war. Furthermore, for the right for the citizens of this country to discuss issues without fear.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Haac Pros And Cons

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Free speech, more than any other of America’s values, has been the touchstone of American democracy dating back to the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment, created in 1791, is so important because “without our basic and essential rights established by that first amendment, the others amendments would have little to no meaning and hardly any force.” It shows the creativity and innovativeness of American democracy. The Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” However, almost from the moment the…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Proponents advocating for speech codes on college campuses claimed that it provided a safe environment for the campuses affiliates. Students should not have had to fear repercussions for their "immutable characteristics" or opinions based on theories, beliefs, or morals (Fraleigh and Tuman, 1997, p. 170). Hate speech, which is any form of insult directed at a single group based on a similar characteristic, was the trigger that jump started speech codes. Regarded by some as unnecessary for the learning environment, hate speech has provoked many violent crimes, but even fiercer battles within the walls of the courtroom. Proponents maintained that hate speech was comparable to fighting words, a type of speech that does not receive First Amendment protection (Hudson Jr., 2005). Speech codes were not developed to restrict speech, but to protect the victims from the offensive words made by others on a college campus.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is the cornerstone of American democracy and the primary protector of the freedoms Americans enjoy. While some might argue that there should be no restrictions on the First Amendment, the First Amendment should be restricted in order to promote public safety and ensure the smooth functioning of society, and those limitations should be narrowly crafted and explicitly defined by the Supreme Court. A person has the right to voice his or her opinion on a matter, regardless of what another person thinks about that opinion. This idea should be protected under the First Amendment unless a person’s opinion expressed through speech incites violence or disrupts the flow of society.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The always extolled US Constitutional First Amendment right to free speech, and the exercise of it, is in truth penultimate to and contingent upon the right to revolution and rebellion as the ultimate and last resort and stand. For the right to free speech is nothing at all but an empty and servile rhetoric without the implied resolve to fight to the death for it in the last instance. Thus also the Second Amendment’s purpose is to provide the people with the ways and means to effect the intrinsic right to revolution/rebellion in guarding against abusive centralized power. As Jefferson stated, the Second Amendment is constructed for the purposes of the peoples’ “last resort, to protect themselves from tyranny in government.” – i.e., revolution.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech in America

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I. According to the 1942 “fighting words doctrine” established by the U.S. Supreme Court; “Any words that incite violence or aggression towards a specific group based on race, creed, sex, sexual orientation, or…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First Amendment Speech

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In our bill of rights, the first amendment we have the freedom of speech. People speak their mind and sometimes don’t have enough words to explain so they turn to the vulgar words. Shoot even kids curse. One curses and doesn’t even realize. But what if it slips out during church?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Issue

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Being able to express one’s self is one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking at freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy. According to the “Derechos, Human Rights”, freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights, because it means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. These types of rights are protected by the first amendment. There are groups for example like ACLU and other type of organization. ACLU is “America’s nation's guardian of liberty”, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights that the Constitution protects. We should be allowed to try our first amendment right specifically dealing with freedom of speech.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Hate Speech

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to the 1930’s speech was not as protected as it is today (Bell, 968). This is a freedom that many take for granted or spend very little time thinking about. While it would be easy to say that banning hate speech would clearly take away the freedom of speech, the truth is banning hate speech would actually provide opportunities for more people to enjoy free speech. According to Bell’s article in the Indiana Law Journal, minorities who are subjected to hate speech are more likely to avoid those situations whether it involves their place of work, home or public environment (966). They are not engaging in discussion like opponents of banning hate speech suggest, there is a clear understanding that this situation is not safe and must be avoided. While some would contend that hate speech is simply, spoken words that some find offensive, Stephen Newman, in Liberty, Community and Censorship, describes hate speech as words that heighten prejudice, and intimidate specific people (375). Even the Supreme Court does not always agree on the defining lines of hate speech. Erik Bleich in his article the Rise of Hate Speech lists several court cases that have helped to define the law in regards to hate speech. These cases include Chaplinsky V. New Hampshire, which introduced the term “fighting words”, Biauharnais V. Illinois, this case involved printed materials, and the case quoted in every article RAV v. City of…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the First Amendment has such strong language, we begin with the presumption that speech is protected. Over the years, the courts have decided that a few other public interests — for example, national security, justice or personal safety — override freedom of speech. There are no simple rules for determining when speech should be limited, but there are some general tests that help.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sissy Speech Code

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How are we to let our children and young adults grow up if we are telling them what they can and cannot say to voice their options. How are we as a society able to grow as thinkers if we can’t voice those thoughts without repercussion. I know the First Amendment does not protect against “offensive speech”, but any speech can be offensive to someone. So I say if your easily offended then grow some thicker skin and have an open mind. It’s just sad to also see these law students at Stanford University wanting to enact these “speech codes”, that they think censorship is okay provided that your motives are okay. When are motives okay to go against the First Amendment? How far will this go they tell us what we can’t say soon it will be what we can’t think then what we can’t do.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays