Preview

What Are The Nuremberg Trials Were Descried As The Best Trials I History?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1181 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Nuremberg Trials Were Descried As The Best Trials I History?
The Nuremberg trials were descried as “the best trials I history” by Norman Birkett a

British judge who presided over the major war criminals (www.wikipedia.org). In my research

paper I will be talking about how the Nuremberg trials were created, the main events and the

people involved and the first and second parts of the trials. The international military tribunal and

the doctor and military trials. The Nuremberg trials were essential in bringing Nazi war criminals

to justice and enabled Europe to move on after world war 2.

The Nuremberg trials were created by the allied forces. Wikipedia.org states “On

January 14th, 1942 representatives from the nine occupying countries met in London to draft the
…show more content…
“law2.umkc.edu states the Doctors

Trial considered the fate of twenty-three German physicians who either participated in the Nazi

program to euthanize persons deemed "unworthy of life" (the mentally ill, mentally retarded, or

physically disabled) or who conducted experiments on concentration camp prisoners without

their consent. The trails lasted for a 140 days. “Eighty-five witnesses testified (law2.umkc.edu)”

“Sixteen of the doctors charged were found guilty. Seven were executed”(law2.umkc.edu).

Law2.umkc.edu states The Justice Trial is one of the most interesting of the Nuremberg trials.

The trial of sixteen defendants, members of the Reich Ministry of Justice or People 's and

Special Courts, raised the issue of what responsibility judges might have for enforcing

grossly unjust--but arguably binding—laws”. In the end they got what they deserved Ten of the

sixteen defendants convicted, four acquitted, one died before verdict, one mistrial due to serious

illness during trial. Four defendants sentenced to life, the other six convicted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    -It was so important because it was a landmark case, it was known for being the crime of the century, the first trial by media and the first to be dominated by forensic science.…

    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module two lab questions

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was the first trial by media and the first to be dominated by forensic science.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 2 Journal

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was interesting to think how dangerous having truth commissions were since the people being tried still had connections to their superiors. The article explained how in certain situations, the truth commotions were forced to be private, in order to keep those associated with the trial…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacob Ind Case Study

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of the cases I viewed, Jacob Ind’s case really caught my attention. In this paper, I will be covering the backstory to Jacob’s life, the results of his actions, and my take on his sentencing.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They were also unjustified because they were out of control and gave no trial to those who were sent to death. “The tribunal followed a formalized legal procedure, but gradually broke down “(63). They soon after gave in and stopped following their word, stopping all the trials. “The tribunal were out of control and kill thousands of innocents and accused men and women”(63). These…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What were the results of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and what happened to the Romanov family?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D. , Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials prosecuting and questioning Nazi war criminals. When Hitler came to power, he created laws persecuting Jews and other enemies of Nazi. These laws provoked the death of 6 million European Jews. In response, the allied leaders of Great Britain, the U.S., and the Soviet Union “issued the first joint declaration officially noting the mass murder of European Jewry and resolving to prosecute those responsible for violence against civilian populations,” (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the tragedy of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush used his powers as Commander in Chief and established a means to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States. On November 13, 2001, Bush issued a military order (M.O.) which allowed the President’s to “identify terrorists and those who support them” and bring them to justice by way of “military tribunals.” President Bush argues that it is his duty to “protect the United States and its citizens.” The M.O. makes this possible by delineating the rules and procedures for military tribunals held during the war on terror.…

    • 14798 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hidden

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The essay “He Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in The Hague”…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September fifteenth, 1935 dictators began imposing the Nuremberg Laws that created it exhausting for Jews to participate in their traditional everyday lives. The laws patterned Jews of their citizenship, created it banned for Jews to marry non-Jews, removed Jews from colleges and prevented Jews from bound professions like serving within the military. once this happened, several Jews were shipped off to death aka concentration camps, killed, beaten, or forced to insect.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essays

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The lament of so many decent …Germans about the burdens and cruelties inflicted by the allies on an innocent Germany…..…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Informed Consent

    • 2404 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In 1947, during the after-effects of the Second World War, the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals; to address the inhuman research practices of the Nazi scientists, the Nuremberg Code was composed. It is generally considered as the initial document implementing ethical principles in human research on the foundation of informed consent (Vollman and Winau). The Nuremberg Code consists of 10 principles, and it addressed three positions about informed consent. First, that voluntary consent is vital for human participants in research. Secondly, the human subject must be free to withdraw participation if so chosen. And thirdly, the researcher must be able to cease the experiment at any given time, if there is probable cause to believe that advancement might result in the injury, disability, or death of a human subject. (Office for Human…

    • 2404 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    More than just a book, The Reader reminds that the concepts of guilt and responsibility are not clear-cut ideas, and even more so during the Nuremberg Trials. Guilt is simply one of the many human emotions, but the feeling of guilt is unique to everyone and there is no one meaning for guilt. Though guilt is such a strong feeling, judgments must not be made simply on how "guilty" one feels for their actions. If that is so, then Hanna would never have gone to jail at all. Judgments should instead be made on the actions of a person and whether the person was right or wrong in what he/she did. This is the concept of responsibility. How responsible a person was for their actions should determine how "guilty" a person is for their crimes. But responsibility is such a difficult question to resolve and deal with because how can you judge how responsible a person is for their actions? In the case of Hanna's trial, how was responsible? The powers that be made the decisions, but people under them carried out these decisions. So who is responsible? The people who made the decisions, or the people who carried out the decisions? It seems that the person who holds the knife must be the one responsible. But fortunately and rightly so, justice is never so easy.…

    • 2167 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays