Preview

Was Julius Caesar A Tyrant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Julius Caesar A Tyrant
Julius Caesar was a tyrant. People feared him and he took power from them. In addition, he was an arrogant, womanizing, political-filled human being who lived by the sword and died by the sword. These characteristics alone made Julius Caesar a tyrant.
Caesar took away all power from the senate. He was filled with empty promises when it came to the senate. Caesar was also very cocky. In “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, it says “Over and again he promised to return power to the Senate once reforms were made”. However, instead, he just gained a new fashion sense and became cocky. In “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, he says “But Caesar took to wearing red boots. Red boots were only worn by kings. He scoffed at the suggestion his wearing them
…show more content…
He also did some cruel things to people which is why he died so brutally. Most of Caesar’s speeches were propaganda material. At the funeral of his aunt, his speech, laudatio Iuliae amitae, ended up being a political statement. Caesar made a reference about his aunt being a direct descendent from the gods and kings. He also referred to Ancus Marcius, an ancient roman king. This shows that Caesar feels like he deserves to be the leader of Rome because, he is a descendent from them. Caesar was a womanizer. On fasinatinghistory.bogspot.com, it says that most people became Caesar’s enemy because he slept with their significant other. Some of these women include: Postumia, wife of Servius Sulpcius, Lollia, wife of Aulus Gabinius, Mucia, Pompey’s wife, Tertulla, Crassus wife and Cleopatra. Caesar only married Calpurnia to progress his career. Caesar even had an affair with Serivila and Tertia, Marcus Brutus’ mother and sister. Caesar used violence and was harshly killed because of it. On enotes.com, it says that Caesar once waited for his enemies to run out of water and then order to have the hands of the survivors cut off. In “Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakesphere, he silences Flavius and Murcellus silenced. However, in the end of it all he was met by a brutal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Caesar was one of the most ambitious and determined men to ever rule the Roman Empire. He became a legend in his own right by defeating his highest political threat at his time, Pompey. Taking Rome by storm, Caesar marched his way to power supported by his loyal army and followers claiming his Dictatorship for life. Changes that he made during his time still remain strong in our time such as the Calendar.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was Roman’s dictator in Julius Caesar. However, He was popular with the common people because he provided entertainment, reduced their debt, conquered land for Rome, and was charisma.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar has always been seen as one of the greatest warlords of all time. He’s right up there with Alexander the Great. Many describe him as incredibly bold in that he took risks that no other would have thought to take. He took every opportunity that showed a glimmer of success even when his comrades doubted him. An example of how Caesar was reckless was going to war with his enemies even when they weren’t ready. Another is when his forces and he went to face Helvetti he ordered them away to show that he would run the same risks he would. A leader leads by example.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was a Roman dictator. He was a liberal person and supported social programs. He reformed Rome by making the constitutional reforms. He is influential in history because he built an empire.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back when the Roman Empire was still in one piece; a man named Julius Caesar, set out to rule it all. The senate of Rome saw Caesar as a threat to their power in the Roman government and, seeing that Caesar was about to become Emperor, they killed him. One question still stands “would Julius Caesar become a ruthless tyrant, or a great ruler of Rome?” , Caesar was a great man. Caesar had a heart for the people of Rome, Providing them with food, jobs, sanitation, and water, as is stated in “Killing Caesar” written by Jon Herman, “The hungry hordes of the city were now given bread.”…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DBQ On Julius Caesar

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Historic Background: Ever since Julius Caesar was a child he dreamed of having great power. During his early political years he used many ways to gain power including bribery, intimidation, and manipulation. He took Romans to new heights while he made Roman long lasting dreams finally come true. He fought many battles and gained Rome many resources and land. When he finally returned to Rome he settled down as dictator for life. This…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was a well liked leader and politician. During his life he helped to transform Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He also expanded the amount of land that was ruled by the Romans. The Republic was in a state of chaos while Caesar was growing up, which tarnished the prestige of Rome, and caused it to appear unsteady and overwhelmed with its own…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a great debate to decide whether Caesar was a tyrant or hero. Based on the information from the passage “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, Caesar is more a hero then tyrant. The average citizen of Rome felt that Caesar was a blessing.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar is a powerful and ambitious leader which the conspirators are very aware of. This makes him dangerous because he is loved by the people and they will follow him. When Brutus and Cassius are conversing, you can see this as Brutus says “what means this shouting? I do fear, the people choose Caesar for their king” (1.2. 168-169). This fear comes from believing that Caesar wants the power for his own benefit and not Rome’s. Many of the senators believed Caesar to be an overly ambitious man. If the Romans choose Caesar as their king, the senators will no longer have power. Caesar wanting to strive for greatness and be in control is why he is brutally stabbed. After the death of Caesar, Antony, Caesar’s most loyal friend, wants to avenge him. After gaining army power to take down the conspirators, his character begins to change becoming dark and deceitful. This is where the ambitiousness of the leaders causes corruption and problems. The ambition also brings competition to the table. The competition is what brings the battles and therefore brings death. After many deaths in both of these books, ambition is shown to be the driving force behind it…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marcus Brutus, a praetor, was an excellent public speaker and he could easily persuade the people of Rome to his thinking. Also, he loved Julius Caesar and he was extremely close with him. But, he loved Rome more than he loved Caesar. Because of his strong and loyal patriotism, Brutus decided that he had to kill Caesar, whom he believed would become a tyrant. Marcus Brutus was an honest but naive man and had a very noble nature. He was said to be the most honorable man and he was a part of the conspiracy that killed Caesar. Also, he was known to be the…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Cesar

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Burton Raffel, an influential critic, writes “Julius Caesar is a relentlessly honest, profoundly moral portrait of the life of power, in which Shakespeare’s characters freely deceive both each other and themselves”. This statement is partially true, giving a person an abundant amount of power can corrupt their intentions. However, the exploitation of Caesar’s power was an exaggerated and dramatized version of the truth. Not every leader who is given authority craves to become an autocrat. Caesar was so hungry for power he was willing to lie to himself, and to the Roman people in order receive it. Eventually Caesar became so confident in himself that he would not listen to the warnings he was given, ultimately leading to his murder.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, Caesar was a great leader and adored by his subjects. At the opening of the play, all of the Romans in the streets are cheering for Caesar and rejoicing in his triumph. Although two soldiers don't agree, the first we hear of Caesar is that is a eagerly supported. At the Feast of Lupercal, for example, Marc Antony tries to crown him king three times, and each time, Caesar refuses. As he does, the people cheer for him because they bel 09ieve him to be so noble. This shows how the people revered him, admired him, and accepted him as their leader. They cheered for him in the streets and supported his every move. Caesar had made many positive changes in Rome, and people appreciate that. Caesar is a good, observant leader as he notices the way that Cassius is not a man to be trusted, and he is correct. He…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar manipulates the Roman people by saying that he is better than everyone. Caesar also says that he would make a great leader and that is why he should have power. While Caesar was declining the crown something happen to him. Casca says “He fell down in the marketplace and foamed at/ mouth and was speechless.”(29) Casca, Brutus and Cassius are all talking about this event because they feel Caesar is not fit for the role of the king. This is one example why they do not feel he is fit. But Caesar does this because Caesar is so involved in getting power that he cannot act normal. Caesar manipulates people because he wants the most power that he can…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar’s downfall was partly due to his “ambition”, although further evidence will prove this a flawed reason on behalf of the conspirators. As Marc Anthony stated sarcastically, Caesar is the furthest thing from ambitious (act 3, scene 2, pg 56). He denied the crown three times (act 1, scene 2, line 119-226), and trusted Brutus as an honest roman, with an honest opinion (act 3, scene 1, line 76). He had already denied the crown, but the crowd was trying to convince him otherwise. Had Brutus explained his thoughts to Caesar, Caesar most likely wouldn’t have even considered taking the crown. Even if the ambition was a villainous trait, Caesar still considered a villainous. If anything, Brutus is to be blamed for his communication error and his naive ways for the death of Caesar. Throughout Caesars life, he never exhibited any signs of ambition.…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays