Preview

Killing Caesar: Tyrant Or Hero

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Killing Caesar: Tyrant Or Hero
There is a great debate to decide whether Caesar was a tyrant or hero. Based on the information from the passage “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, Caesar is more a hero then tyrant. The average citizen of Rome felt that Caesar was a blessing. Caesar is more a hero then a tyrant because he helped Rome. In the passage it says, “Never before had Rome been governed so well, or so efficiently”. The senate was running Rome poorly, so when Caesar took control he ran Rome better than the senate did. In the passage it says, “Caesar created jobs by building roads, temples, and aqueducts”. Caesar improved Rome after he took power from the senate. Caesar is a hero and not a tyrant because he was loved by the people of Rome. In the passage it says,” To

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Caesar was one of the most ambitious and determined men to ever rule the Roman Empire. He became a legend in his own right by defeating his highest political threat at his time, Pompey. Taking Rome by storm, Caesar marched his way to power supported by his loyal army and followers claiming his Dictatorship for life. Changes that he made during his time still remain strong in our time such as the Calendar.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was Roman’s dictator in Julius Caesar. However, He was popular with the common people because he provided entertainment, reduced their debt, conquered land for Rome, and was charisma.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was a Roman dictator. He was a liberal person and supported social programs. He reformed Rome by making the constitutional reforms. He is influential in history because he built an empire.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back when the Roman Empire was still in one piece; a man named Julius Caesar, set out to rule it all. The senate of Rome saw Caesar as a threat to their power in the Roman government and, seeing that Caesar was about to become Emperor, they killed him. One question still stands “would Julius Caesar become a ruthless tyrant, or a great ruler of Rome?” , Caesar was a great man. Caesar had a heart for the people of Rome, Providing them with food, jobs, sanitation, and water, as is stated in “Killing Caesar” written by Jon Herman, “The hungry hordes of the city were now given bread.”…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cincinnatus: A Roman Hero

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cincinnatus won the war in 13 days. Many people were happy and they asked Cincinnatus to be a dictator for life. Cincinnatus turned down the offer because he knew that having a republic was better that having a dictator. He knew that a dictator could abused their power. Cincinnatus left Rome and continued his life on his farm. One reason Cincinnatus should be recognized as a hero was that he won a war in 13 days. If Cincinnatus did not step in, Rome would be destroyed and many people would have died. Most heroes are pictured as people who win battles and save lives. The second reason that Cincinnatus should be a hero was that he was selfless. Cincinnatus turned down the offer to be a dictator for life because he wanted to help his city instead of himself. He knew that having a republic was better than having a dictator. If Cincinnatus became a dictator, he would have been greedy enough for power. Instead, he turned down the offer and continued his life on his farm. This shows that Cincinnatus was not greedy for power. He puts people in front of himself. He gave up the offer for his city. This shows that Cincinnatus is selfless. Of all the things he did, he should be recognized as a…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Could a well known emperor be both a hero and a villain? Julius Caesar faced a lot of criticism during his period of reign, however; he overthrew the wickedness of the Roman people and made sure everyone had equal rights. Overall, Julius Caesar was a emperor who cared about the common people instead of himself.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar was a strong, brave military leader. When Caesar left Rome to fight a war against his once great friend Pompey, he wasn’t defeated and came back to Rome victorious (Act I, scene i, line 32-39). In Rome or any great empire, a leader must be a fearless military warrior and Julius Caesar is one of the best when it comes to being victorious.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everybody "[bows] to Caesar", and they love Caesar, and even offer him the crown (Parenti 5).…

    • 2644 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar had many achievements such as his military tactics expanding Rome,his political reign changing Rome to Dictatorship from Republic, and his assassination devastating Rome causing war and allies. Caesar was a very memorable man for Rome and the whole…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar died on March 15, 44 BC, in Rome, Italy. His death was very crucial. Stabbed 23 times, and only one wound was fatal, leading him to his death. This death was an assassination, which was committed by his own senators at a meeting that was held in a hallway next to Pompey’s Theatre. It was thought that Caesar died suffering knowing that the stabbing were very painful. This would be because stab wounds aren't fatal unless punctured through the muscle tissue, which is hard because there are too many things such as rib cage, and arms to block the weapon. There are two theories to caesars fatal stab wound, one he was stabbed in the chest which caused blood to enter the chest cavity. This would cause his lungs to collapse and leading to suffocation.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, rulers of other countries still bear the title Caesar. This name has achieved an unprecedented amount of respect. Julius Caesar is one of Rome's most famous leaders, and he has come to deserve that fame. Julius has many of the discrete characteristics of a leader. He was egotistic (some may say an egomaniac), he had a controlling power, he was intelligent, and he was ambitious. Although his reign did not prove as beneficial to Rome as it did for him, he is still considered a great leader.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Caesar is being described as an individual who could be a god over other Romans and that the people could be used as Caesar’s detriment…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What is ironic about the timing of Caesar's murder (in relation to the preceding events)?…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership and Dido

    • 363 Words
    • 1 Page

    Caesar as a leader was a very harsh and a very unmanly man. Caesar was a man who made them fight for his own wars. He had many men battle for. Caesar is also a very non believer. Caesar was part of a very bloody war. He went into battle with his men who he sent their first and they fought in a blood bath. Caesar said he had to do this because there was no other route when really there was. Caesar was not a good man because with this that he did it was bloody and it was not a very good battle for him because many live where lost. This makes me believe that Caesar is a poor leader not caring about his men or caring about the fact if he win or loses. Caesar also didn't care about the fact of the land. If he messed it up so be it. Caesar a poor leader in my eyes.…

    • 363 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays