Voting Right Act 1965

The Voting Right Act in 1965 can easily be seen as a massive victory and step in the right direction for equality. I had always thought the Voting Right Act was the end of it. Until recently I had no idea some states had lacked the ability to make or change laws that concerned voting. I was under the assumption that everyone was equal and had the same rights. I was in complete disbelief when I learned that most of the southern states did not have the ability to change laws for fear they might enforce a law that may discriminate. While it saddens me to see that most of the south had to function under watchful eyes, I can clearly see why. However, not everything is always black and white, there are undoubtedly some grey areas
(civilrights.org, 2013). Are you kidding me? The more I read about the outrage against the law the angrier I become! An article published by the Washington Post made it seem like we were being ridiculous and unnecessarily harsh with lower-income minorities. (Horwitz, May 23). Why in the world wouldn’t the entire United States implement this procedure? It’s not racism, it’s completely fair. People want equality until it doesn’t benefit them. The article went on to say “Opponents say that the laws were designed to target people more likely to vote Democratic.” Give me a break. It’s to ensure that legal, productive members of society are the one’s casting their votes. It’s common sense. It’s not to discriminate. People 18 and older should have some sort of proper identification. Like I said before, this is obviously not a black and white situation. There are always going to be people that were dealt a bad hand or have a special circumstance. Make it easier for those people to share their stories and obtain identification, not change the law to let just anyone walk in and vote. The article also mentioned that Texas also allowed concealed handgun license to be used as proper identification. How very Texan of