Preview

Vladimir Lenin - Revolutionary Momentum

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1184 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vladimir Lenin - Revolutionary Momentum
In April 1917, a month after the Romanov Dynasty in Russia effectively ended with the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II, Vladimir Ilich Lenin returned to Russia from exile with a formidable revolutionary mentality. The Tsar’s abdication prompted a period of dual power between select members of the defunct fourth Duma, now termed the Provisional Government, and the newly formed Petrograd Soviet. This arrangement offered a sense of political stability, a stability that was detrimental to Lenin’s quest for permanent revolution. Thus, Lenin’s return had a clear purpose; to cease the political cooperation between the two governing bodies, which would in turn enable him to instigate the implementation of socialism in Russia. This movement was inaugurated by his speech at Finland Station and more significantly cemented in his infamous “April Theses” that was originally published in the Bolshevik’s newspaper, Pravda on April 7th 1917. The Theses was, in simple terms, a collection of Lenin’s arguments that called for Soviet control of the state, yet in essence it was the Bolshevik blueprint for revolution.

The fundamental aspect of Lenin’s Theses is the simultaneous call for the overthrow of the liberal bourgeois government and a campaign for socialism. Lenin states that “Russia… is passing from the first stage of revolution… to its second stage, which must place power in the hands of the proletariat and the poorest sections of the peasants” and, significantly, he believes this to only be possible with “no support for the Provisional Government”. In this sense, Lenin destroys the idea of a prolonged capitalist stage as he seeks the immediate commencement of the transition to socialism through the “social production and the distribution of products… under the control of the Soviets of Workers’ Deputies.” It is this underlying drive for socialism that effectively ends the cooperative period of dual government and ignites a competitive political environment.



Bibliography: Vladimir Lenin, The April Theses, ‘The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution’, Moscow, 1970 Vladimir Lenin, Letters From Afar, in A. Fineberg (ed.), V. I. Lenin Selected Works Volume VI From the Bourgeois Revolution to the Proletarian Revolution, London, 1946, pp. 3, 7. Neil Harding, Lenin’s Political Thought Volume 1 Theory and Practice in the Democratic Revolution, New York, 1978, p. 13. Sheila Fitzpatrick, The Russian Revolution, Oxford, 1994, p. 51

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He fuelled a period of massive industrialisation which ultimately lead to the emergence of a new social group; the urban proletariat. This group, who had little status in Russian society in the period 1854-1894, now played a major role in Russia, meaning a change in an average workers status. By 1914, there were 2.9 million workers employed in Russia working in 24,900 factories. However, this period comes with a degree of continuity in the level of status of workers; in 1910 only half of Russia’s national productivity was industrial. This points in the general direction that, as with the reigns of Alexander the II and III, the peasants were the social class with more power. The provisional government of February 1917 marked a change for the status of workers in Russia. It was formed with the Petrograd soviet, a council of workers and soldiers. They controlled the railway, postal and telegraph services; a level of status in which workers had previously never held. During Lenin’s rule, there were varying degrees of workers status: ‘While the peasantry suffered between 1918 and 1921, the urban workers became better off…The NEP clearly benefited the peasantry at the expense of urban workers’1. This quote from Lee can be challenged, as during war communism 1918 the populations of Moscow dropped by half. This shows that workers…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the October Coup in 1917, the Bolshevik’s power as the government of Russia was not completely solidified. This was mainly due to the vast opposition that the Bolsheviks experienced from all over Russia along with other pressing issues such as food shortages, an exhausting war, and a crippled economy. Yet the Bolsheviks not only survived the early day‘s of empowerment but went on to rule Russia for the next 70 years. This essay will examine the factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to have such a sweeping success in ruling Russia.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Dzerzhinsky, Felix Edmundovich." In Encyclopedia of Russian History, edited by James R. Millar, 422-423. Vol. 1. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2004. World History in Context (accessed November 9, 2017). http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3404100385/WHIC?u=seve27129&xid=280b5e42.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonetheless, with the release of the “April Theses” by Lenin, the Bolsheviks support grew. The “April Theses” pushed what Lenin thought Russia needed most at that time: ‘Peace, Bread and Land.’ This vastly appealed to masses of the lower working class of Russia; they had been exhausting this for years; the mass famine across Russia, the land controversy’s that exploited the peasant populace, which approximately made up 80% of the Russian population, and the continuation of the war, which…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bolsheviks Primary Source

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Source A is supposed to be a valuable one because it’s adapted from Lenin’s April Theses for Peace, thus offering a perspective on the Revolution from the Bolshevik Party leader himself. However, the fact that it’s ‘adapted’ lowers its credibility, as the document might have suffered misleading changes, meant to portray Lenin and the Bolsheviks in a certain way. Moreover, the extract is published by the official communist newspaper which indicates a clear bias in favour of the Bolshevik Revolutionaries, making it a secondary source.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 1 Stalin Myth Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He argues that under Lenin was a “collectable leadership” with which they discussed political strategy. Stalin was power-hungry who repressed those who would stand up for their opinion, he didn't listen to the people and attacked those who supported him. Using the idea of “Enemy of the people” to justify his actions.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Vladimir Lenin.” Encyclopedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Britannica, inc., 18 Dec.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx, Karl, Engels, Friedrich edited by McLellan, David. The Communist Manifesto. New York, United States: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vladimir Lenin’s own thirst for knowledge was a catalyst towards him becoming a professional revolutionary. According to one investigator of his youth,…

    • 5832 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social History

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social historians who intend to focus on understanding the root causes and motivations for the revolutions of 1917, look towards the actions and behaviour of normal, everyday people involved within the Revolution rather than the influence of great men and women, or the policies of a state. Social historians observe and comment on the fact that leading up to 1917, there was a widening and very apparent gap between the richest members of Russia society and the very poorest members. Rather than being typecast as the ignorant and stupid masses, many Russians from all different walks of life whether they were soldiers, peasants, factory workers, or homemakers developed their own consciousness and opinions as to what that the revolution meant for Russia, how they should function in a new society, how that society should be structured, and what it should look like. In contrast to what Bolshevik propaganda would have some of us believe, many Russians did not blindly follow or believe in demagogues like Trotsky or Lenin who were promising bread, circuses, and miracles for the suffering population. Instead, many developed their own opinions on what kind of regime should take power and represent Russia and what type of laws should govern the land. Due to the fact that the vast swarm of Russian society was what would be considered lower-class, the message of the Bolsheviks for a government and party to represent the lower-class was simply much more appealing than other parties at the time such as the liberals or the conservative factions in the government. Peace by the means of an end to the Russian involvement in the First World War, bread for the starving masses in the cities, and land to those who were disappointed by the lack of agricultural reform since the emancipation of 1861 were all promises that were much more appealing than the message of the provincial government. The…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Marx, Karl. 1971. Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Tr. S. W. Ryanzanskaya, edited by M. Dobb. London: Lawrence & Whishart.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays