Preview

Vitro Testing: Should Animals Replace Animals?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
747 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vitro Testing: Should Animals Replace Animals?
What if aliens landed on earth to do experimentation on humans? What if the aliens infected humans with a disease? I bet you would be scared as they injected, you with harmful diseases. One after another the pain would be unbearable. Then when the aliens have no use for you, and you serve no purpose, they cut you open for data. Aren’t you glad this hasn't happened, and we don't have to go through this? Then, why do you do this to animals, animals feel pain the same ways humans do? Animals feel like they're being abducted by another life form, and being experimented on. Animals feel pain like humans do physically, and mentally. But, it's fine it's not humans being taken from their families and injected with harmful chemicals. I wonder if that's how the aliens will think. Animal experimentation is one of the ethical issues of our time, and large-scale experimentation can not thrive, therefore, the use of alternatives should grow.

Scientists and, cosmetic companies think
…show more content…
If that is true, then why is Vitro testing growing in popularity? Vitro testing could completely replace animals use in testing. Vitro testing is all done in a test tube. According to Bonnie of being animal experimentation ethical "As opposed to in vivo, in the living being test, in a vitro test are performed in test tubes,..."( Is Animal Experimentation ethical 69). If testing in test tubes, and not in living beings, the need for animals will drop. Using test tube will not only drop animal use, it could also give more accurate results. "in contrast, to the animal test cellular basement methods(vitro) not only proving cheaper, faster, and easier to use but also are providing more relevant information" (Good Medicine 10). Good medicine is a famous article that shows any advancements in medicine. So who would you trust Good Medicine or cosmetics companies, on the use of animals for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How would you feel if you were captured in a laboratory and forced to smell toxic fumes until death? Or immobilized in a restraining device for hours? Or have your skin burned off and spinal cord crushed? This is the reality for more than 100 million animals worldwide. In Canada, over 3.33 million animals are used in experiments and over 125 000 are subjected to severe pain. The animals are left for days to wait in fear of the next terrifying and traumatic experiment that will be performed on them. Major effects of stress and boredom trigger neurotic behaviors in the animals these include spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own hair and biting their own skin. Days go by, and after being locked in their tiny cages filled with fear, their journey usually ends with death. Animals are said to be used for advances and safety checks in products, but are the tests truly…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APA Code Of Ethics Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Experimentations on animals can cause various types of pains. In the APA code of ethics, it states that animals should be treated as humanely as possible, unless there is no other way (Bayard, 229). However, this goal should be justified by the “prospective scientific. Educational, or applied value” (Bayard, 229).There is a distinction made between humans and animals when humans are registered under the animal domaine. Homo sapiens are not any better than any other species, and it is not fair, that the other species have to suffer at the expense of potentially benefitting another species.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, animal testing is immensely erroneous. The FDA states that 92% of products tested on animals fail on human subjects. That fact makes a lot of people, including the FDA, question why we even consider animal testing anymore. The FDA states that…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hey hey

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cosmetic and drug companies continually face opposition due to the fact that they use animals for the testing of their products. Some feel that this procedure goes against the rights which are given to all living beings, including animals, while others see the positive impact that animal testing brings to the lives of human beings.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many alternatives that exist to the use of live animals in research and most non-animal testing methods are more reliable and less expensive. Some of those alternatives are, “synthetic skin” called Corrositex, computer modeling, improved statistical design, and the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA). “Another resource that exists to prove the viability and relevance of using non-animal testing methods is Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME).” FRAME is located in England and seeks to promote a moderate, but determined approach, by encouraging a consideration of the ethical and scientific issues involved in animal testing for cosmetics.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results that should be illegal and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most animal testing is very inaccurate because human beings have different chemistry than animals, some animals are similar to humans but they have gaps that can prevent or make false cures that can do more harm than help that is why animals are given medicine that people are not prescribed. “U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved. Of those approved, half are withdrawn…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, as I am not exactly experienced in the medical field, I managed to do some research, and eventually found a rather interesting quote said by two doctors, Ray and Jean Greek, who briefly mentioned the necessity of animal testing in their book Sacred Cows and Golden Geese. They said: "Animal experimentation is not necessary. It is expensive. It is inaccurate. It is misleading. It consumes limited resources. And further, it is detrimental to the very species it professes to be working to help --…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is true, but it overlooks that someone will still have to be the first human to test the product regardless. The Food and Drug administration requires some testing, but there are alternatives that cost less and take less time, and are more accurate than animal testing. Harvard's Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering has created “organs on chips” which are made with living human cells. These chips can replace animal testing in the future. Wyss researchers wrote on the organs-on-chips project page, "Clinical studies take years to complete and testing a single compound can cost more than $2 million. Meanwhile, innumerable animal lives are lost, and the process often fails to predict human responses." In conclusion, in order to end animal testing, it needs to be harder to violate the Animal Welfare Act and more appealing to consider alternatives. I wish to end with a quote by Professor Charles R. Magel, “Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because they are like us,’ ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are not like…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is an expression that the vast majority has heard yet is maybe still uncertain of precisely what is included. Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it alludes to the experimentation completed on creatures. It is utilized to survey the wellbeing and adequacy of everything from medicine to beautifying agents, and also seeing how the human body functions. While supporters trust it is a vital practice, those contradicted to creature testing trust that it includes the torment and Suffering of Animals.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has been a topic of debate for many generations. It is difficult to imagine a common house hold pet subjected to extreme procedures of the mildest and painless form to the harshest form imaginable. I am talking about your average mouse, rabbit, cat or dog. At the same time, consumers want to be assured they are using the safest products available, and people want science to find cures for life-threatening diseases. Lately, science has tried to prove out theories and hypnosis through computer algorithms but we still have to rely on physical subjects like the animals referenced. There is no public argument that says we should not test products before entering the market, the debate is the method by which these products should be tested. Animal testing is necessary for biomedical research, but should be eradicated for vanity reasons in terms of cosmetics.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Animal Testing

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though animal testing helps create cures, animals not having long lives, and the tests possibly being able to help them, animal testing is a horrible thing. Vitro testing is a great alternative to animal testing, because of it being less expensive, being more reliable, and causing no cruelty. Another reason why animal testing is a horrid thing because animals suffer because the scientist don't know how safe the drugs are. Animals are also extremely different from humans so it flaws the…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered what animal testing has helped us accomplished? Also, what it has done to our lives? I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it allows us to test medications before they are given to people and has helped us uncover other important things.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Advancement

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Every day, animals such as rabbits, chimpanzees, and mice take part of medical experimentation. “Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans. The United States and Gabon are the only two countries that allow experimentation on chimpanzees.” (The Jane Goodall Institute of Canada). What people don’t understand is that these animals contribute to medical discoveries regarding human health. Animals should be used for medical experimentation because they contribute to many life-saving cures and treatments, they are similar to human beings in many ways, animals are the only organisms other than humans who we can experiment on, and the animals themselves benefit…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cosmetic Animal Testing

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Animal testing is still done by cosmetic companies even though it is unethical and scientifically inaccurate. The various tests carried out on animals is not a guarantee for using cosmetics on our skin since animals react differently to certain chemicals as compared to humans. Cosmetics companies kill millions of animals every year in pursuit of profit. The animals that suffer and die in these laboratories range from rabbits to mice. According to companies that perform such tests, they are done to establish the safety of products and ingredients. However, no law requires that cosmetics products be tested on animals. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “urges cosmetic manufacturers to conduct whatever tests are appropriate to establish that their cosmetics are safe” but “does not specifically mandate animal testing for cosmetic safety.” Likewise, products regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) do not have to be tested on animals. A summary of the CPSC’s animal-testing policy, as published in the Federal Register, states that “it is important to keep in mind that neither the FHSA [Federal Hazardous Substances Act] nor the Commission’s regulations require any firm to perform animal tests. The statute and its implementing regulations only require that a product be labeled to reflect the hazards associated with that product.” ("Cosmetics.")…

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays