Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiments
How would you feel if you were captured in a laboratory and forced to smell toxic fumes until death? Or immobilized in a restraining device for hours? Or have your skin burned off and spinal cord crushed? This is the reality for more than 100 million animals worldwide. In Canada, over 3.33 million animals are used in experiments and over 125 000 are subjected to severe pain. The animals are left for days to wait in fear of the next terrifying and traumatic experiment that will be performed on them. Major effects of stress and boredom trigger neurotic behaviors in the animals these include spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own hair and biting their own skin. Days go by, and after being locked in their tiny cages filled with fear, their journey usually ends with death. Animals are said to be used for advances and safety checks in products, but are the tests truly …show more content…
Therefore most of these animal tests are inaccurate. Diseases that may develop in humans are genetically engineered differently than any other animal. This relates back to the unethical side, as millions of animals are being tortuously killed just to be disposed of. Animal tests have no way of predicting the outcomes or results on a human, medical treatment is very specific to the individual being treated. Prescribed medicines are unique and are tweaked to work for that human specifically, testing on a whole new species does not effectively correspond to the human body.
Along with animal testing, comes many newly developed tests that do not involve animals in any way. Scientific advances have led some companies to thankfully turning to a cruelty-free approach. Some of these companies include Lush, NYX, Smashbox, Aveda

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is bad science. Time and time again animal experiments show that it is wasting lives and resources. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health. They do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity” (Animal testing). Animals are not like humans. The way an animal reacts to a certain tests, may not be…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personaly I don't think that there are many pros about this subject, but I've written down a few.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine this, you are a cute little beagle puppy, locked in a cage inside of a research lab. The scientists who have you locked in that cage are trying to find cures for certain diseases and illnesses. They would take you out of your cage and take some blood samples, and then they inject you with a sedative so they can start their experiments. Some of the experiments may cause you to die, or get sick. But one thing is for certain, you will never be the puppy that gets to live with a nice family, and live a happy life.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans. As such, researchers do recognise the limitations and differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hawkins, P., Hau, J., Carlsson, H., Hagelin, J., Roberts, I., Meredith, M., . . . Botting, J. (2001). Animal Research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 322(7302), 1603-1605. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.library.arizona.edu/stable/25467253…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout many years animals have been used for human purposes, without consideration of the pain or discomfort that it may cause these creatures. Approximately one hundred million animals are used in laboratories annually world wide, and it is time for that to change. Not only is animal testing cruel and inhumane, but it is also not necessary, as it is not always accurate and there are now alternatives to test products.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered how people figured out if medicine works? Animal testing, or animal experimentation, has been going on for a long time. It is the process of using animals with similar DNA, such as chimpanzees, to test new cosmetic and medical products to try and figure out how they will work on humans. It is a very controversial subject . Some people argue animal testing provides valuable information for people and new products; Animal testing needs to be stopped because it is torture to animals and the information gathered is not always accurate.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Unethical

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two really strong points arise from people who feel animal testing is beneficial. The first point that comes up is “There is no adequate alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system.” (ProCon, 2016). Because the living systems of both humans and animals are extremely complex, studying animals and humans in a petri dish doesn’t provide the opportunity in studying the entire system of a human or animal. Determining how a medication affects a human, it requires for it to run through the organs to get the full effect. In this way, animals and humans are very similar. However, the point against it is there are now alternative testing that can completely replace animal testing. The use of petri dishes, involving animal and human cells can provide more productive results since it provides the opportunity in using both human and animal cells. Researchers are able to provide microdoses of medications to human beings in which if any poor results were to happen, the dose wouldn’t be large enough for something severally significant to happen. From there, blood can be used in which would allow researchers to make an observation on how a medication can alter a human beings body. Additionally, scientists are able to make artificial organs from tissues and human cells by using a microchip to recreate the functions of human organs. All…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Animal Testing

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Economist article, “Be Nice to Mice… Animal Testing,” notes that only one in every ten drugs tested on animals actually works on humans. This is because they are fed a lot to keep their bodies warm since they are kept in cool conditions. The cool conditions are said to keeps their temper at bay. But eating as much as they do alters the way they metabolize the drug. There are many different factors that are involved that make animal testing results difficult to translate into a hypothesis for what human results would be. James-Enger, author of Vegetarian Times article “Beyond Animal Testing,” states that using animals to predict how humans will react to the same drug or medical treatment is not a good experiment due to the difference in anatomy between humans and animals. Even testing animals with similar DNA, like chimpanzees, is not a good test because they do not react the same way as humans. For example, chimps, being our closest relatives, still did not contract AIDS when introduced to the HIV virus (Kelly). Another faulty test occurred when testing a drug called fenphen. Animals showed no serious side effects, but when tested on humans it caused heart-valve defects and was taken off the market (Kelly). There are quite a few recalls due to the inaccuracy of animal experimentation. It has also been prevalent that many tests have been over tested for no…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most animal tests do not work and are not effective. Sure, people might argue that animal testing has advanced our medicine and saved countless lives. Well, that is true but, most things we are experimenting today, since we have came very far in the medicine department, can not be effectively tested on animals. Humans and animals are not much alike as well. Animals have different metabolic structures, and anatomy. Also, almost all drugs are re-tested on human subjects. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) states that 95% of drugs that were successfully tested on animals but failed in human tests because they were dangerous. The same thing happened with cancer medicine, 93% of tests failed on human trials but not on animal trials. Most medical advances for human health are not even based on animal trials. Just like Paul Furlong, professor of clinical neuroimaging, said “We’re not 70 kg…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Test animals have been “purpose bred”, meaning that not only them but the animals that gave birth to them have been tested and force bred by doctors and scientist also. Animal testing is conducted by universities, the military, government agencies corporations, contract research organizations, cleaning suppliers, and a large variety of cosmetic companies. Although there are regulations to using animals for testing, many companies sadly do not follow them and treat the animals extremely unfair. These regulations are replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement meaning use of non-animal…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is unreliable. For example, Dr. Richard Kluasher, the former director of the national cancer institute states that “ We have cured cancer in mice for decades and it simply didn't work in humans”. This statement shows the unreliability of animal testing. Just because it worked on a…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medicines such as insulin, the polio vaccine, lithium, and penicillin were all tested on animals. After all humans share around 95% of genes with mice making them a prime test subject. Humans and animals also have similar organs which do either the same or slightly different functions. While the experiments seem harsh and inhumane the scientists have to follow strict laws to ensure the animal's well being worldwide. Most scientists use the “Three R’s” method. The Three Rs are Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement. Replacement is using non animal methods when animal use is not necessary. Reduction is using the fewest amount of animals possible for an experiment. Finally, Refinement is using the best way possible to reduce as much suffering as possible. Since 1901 almost every Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine has used some form of animal research. The creator of the Polio vaccine Albert Sabin said “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Vivisection helped create treatment for syphilis, malaria, smallpox, etc. It even helped scientists learn about tumors and brain disorders. While animal testing has several benefits not a lot of people are happy with how the animals have been treated during the…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition to the brutal tortures that happens in laboratories, genetic manipulation is a common kind of experimentation on primates, cats, dogs, mice, rats, and many other creatures. Due to the abnormalities and diseases, many of these animals are unable to live on. As for animals’ daily living conditions, they spend their lives in cages, not being able to live freely with choices or communicate. They never get to experience the outdoors of fresh air and sunshine, instead, they are contained within bars and walls. Not only that, their cages are small and crowded, and they live with loud noises and bright lights that are known to cause stress in animals. Days after days in laboratories, they experience ongoing mental and physical suffering from fear, boredom, confinement, and emotional stress. In addition to those sufferings, they live to endure the continuous procedures with fear and agony (“Harm and Suffering”). Although researchers have admitted to knowing that abused animals used for testings in…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays