Therefore; either one could be using the other for sex, short term lust, and just pure companionship, but with no actual want for involvement. Both peoples maxims are geared toward the wrong reasons, sex for just the hell of it, not wanting a passion filled and strong connection sex. Being the case a Kantian theorist would say this is wrong. Since both, betrayal and the usage of another person is happening this action is not just; therefore, I am obligated to tell Suzie. I do not want to lead on deceit, because I want to have morally right actions, unlike Billy. Another approach would be treating Billy special if I didn’t tell Suzie, while it is known that I find them both equally good friends. There is no reason to treat Billy more special, in his case there are no exceptions. A Kantian would say to not treat one friend more special over the other, due to the fact that is not fair to the friend that is being deceived. Therefore, resulting in a Kantian declaring his actions immoral and
Therefore; either one could be using the other for sex, short term lust, and just pure companionship, but with no actual want for involvement. Both peoples maxims are geared toward the wrong reasons, sex for just the hell of it, not wanting a passion filled and strong connection sex. Being the case a Kantian theorist would say this is wrong. Since both, betrayal and the usage of another person is happening this action is not just; therefore, I am obligated to tell Suzie. I do not want to lead on deceit, because I want to have morally right actions, unlike Billy. Another approach would be treating Billy special if I didn’t tell Suzie, while it is known that I find them both equally good friends. There is no reason to treat Billy more special, in his case there are no exceptions. A Kantian would say to not treat one friend more special over the other, due to the fact that is not fair to the friend that is being deceived. Therefore, resulting in a Kantian declaring his actions immoral and