Utilitarianism In Nazi Germany Analysis

Upon examination, the dissectioning of the philosophical spectra of Nazi Germany during the Second World War holds fundamental discrepancy of core beliefs in the ruling of the social construct. With specification, the rise in German Nazism posed challenges in keeping previously enlightened philosophical prospects; the idea of a superior race scrutinizes the condemning of the inferior race by means of exercising the belief of utilitarianism, and the social discourse valued in the predetermined designation of the extinction and eradication of an entire race. This deviation poses a critical synopsis on the questioning of the said proposition in such that the previously universally dominant Kantian principles regarding the issue of humanitarian
The idea of utilitarianism stifles in the moral attributions of society itself. The belief that a social composition should prioritize and emphasize the usefulness of one’s individuality prompts the prosecution of those who are considered socially useless as morally justified: “The Nazi biomedical vision included the belief that certain ‘race’ are superior to others; that scientific management could solve social problems… to improve the genetic composition of their citizenry in hope of creating a society in which individuals would be economically useful” (Bekier). Seemingly, Nazi Germany perceived the prospect of utilitarianism to have the sense of ‘good’ moral judgement. This manipulation of moral values detain the functions of the social construct in agreement to a perceived goal, even if the violations of human existentialism are of prominent distinction. In addition, Nazi Germany believed that, biologically, certain types of humans contained infrequencies in the cellular genome. For this cause, the superior race are in obligation to eliminate certain genetic traits and override the natural discourse of evolutionary biology in order to pertain in social
In other words, the derivative for the social advancement in Nazi Germany is necessarily approved without the approval of the targeted subjects. If the better well-being of the social construct can be harnessed from the required indoctrinations, even by the manner of violating one’s natural rights of self-approving existentialism, then the moral acquisition for that indoctrination is, by law, legitimate, This type of cogitation arises in the problematic consideration for the targeted subjects in scientific researching. Unlike Nazi Germany’s utilitarianist ordination, the Kantian principles socially argued that the regard for the people’s individual rights of construct are in designation of highest priority in medical experimentation. That is, medical experimentation in justification for the betterment of society cannot disregard the subject’s right of consent and agreement. Other sources for this necessity are to be profounded upon before the consideration for ‘necessary’ human medical experimentation. Bekier states, “According to Kantian principles (the categorical imperative), people cannot be forced to accept treatment or be subject to medical experimentation for ‘the good of the majority’. The