Preview

Usama Ibn Munqidh's 'The Book Of Contemplation'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Usama Ibn Munqidh's 'The Book Of Contemplation'
A question that has long been asked is whether the Muslims and the Franks lived as friends or foes in the Holy Land after the First Crusade. The Book of Contemplation by Usama Ibn Munqidh describes the 12th century society in the holy Land, and that society was not as hostile as some historians believe, though it was not a rosy relationship. This does not mean that there was no tension between the Franks and the Muslims. Throughout The Book of Contemplation, Munqidh gives the reader the impression that the Islamic way is the best way compared to the Franks. We see almost a childish we-can-do-it-better type comparison, especially in regrads to medicine and the judicial system. In medicine, Munqidh tells the story of a man with an abcess in his leg and a woman with “dryness of humours.” Munqidh wrote, “To the knight I applied a small poultice until the abcess opened up and he was healed, and the woman I put on a diet and increased the wetness of her humours.” He then describes how the medicine how the Franks results in the death of both of his patients. “And then a Frankish physician came to them and said ‘This fellow don’t know how to treat them.’” The physician amputates the leg of the man …show more content…
The Historian R.C. Smail said that the Latin East was a society immersed in conflict. The evidence from The Book of Contemplation shows us that Latin East society was immersed in tension, but not full rioting. It would be unfair to say that there was constant fighting in the cities because the Franks were the ruling minority. If there was no cooperation they could have been ousted quickly. Conflicts still happened, and we can tell from the writing of Usama Ibn Munqidh that the relationship between the toe groups was not rosy, but some cooperation and even friendships happened in Latin East society as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the time of Gregory of tours Eastern Europe as we know it today was in a state of constant change. Regularly new leaders were rising and falling from the barbarian tribes of the Franks and Gaul’s which took over their formerly Roman owned land. Gregory specifically describes the massive amounts of violence that hangs over that ancient world like a black cloud. Merovingian Gaul was a whirlpool of violence and war in the sixth century. Very few kings took territory and held it for long. King Clovis I was the first Frankish king to take Roman held land permanently.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Crusades Dbq

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After centuries of being a place for pilgrims, the Holy Land was conquered by Seljuk Turks. The Seljuk turks have closed the pilgrimage routes and attacked many Christian pilgrims. We have also been informed that they attacked Christian lands held by the Byzantines in Anatolia.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the late 11th century, before the First Crusade was preached, the Byzantine Empire in the east was quickly losing land to the Seljuk Turks in Asia Minor. These Turks had rapidly expanded throughout the Near East since the 1040’s, and were now engaged in a rivalry with the Fatimid rulers of Egypt. Both of these Muslim entities now had strong presences in the Holy Land and its surrounding regions, though the Seljuks had fallen into disunity and division by the 1090’s. One faction of the original group was in control of Jerusalem itself in 1095 when the Council of Clermont was held. Some Christians were offended by the idea of these Muslims having authority over what they knew as the “Holy Land”; The…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book, Discovering the Global Past, Merry Wiesner describes the Crusades from both the Muslim and Catholic perspective. For both religious groups, Wiesner alludes to the fact that people’s biases and the creation of “the other” had shaped negative views of the two groups. In this paper, I will argue how both the Catholic’s and Muslims’ had an inaccurate and partisan view of each other, which led to the creation of “othering”. I will do this by briefly showing the biases, as narrated by Malcolm Barber. I will then utilize documents from the chapter, “Two Faces of Holy War” from Merry Wiesner’s text, to show examples of how bias clouded the Muslims’ view of Catholic’s, and the Catholics’ view of…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years 400-600, the kingdom border changed by cause of these wars. During this chaotic turbulence, the church stood by Rome and helped them get through the war by providing safety and strength. A Germanic tribe named the Franks took over the entire Germanic tribes, led by a strong leader by the name of Clovis. The Franks controlled a big part of Europe. Charles Martel, the mayor of the palace, expanded regions in the north, south, and eastern parts, thereby defeating the Muslims.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Usamah Relationship Essay

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They completely contradict the manifestos of both sides. Whereas; the Muslims depict the Crusaders as vicious animals ripping out the throats of Muslims and the Crusaders depict the Muslims as heretics and animals. Yet, these excerpts show both sides as moralistic and humane.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Muslim disunity was an important factor which lead to the success of the First Crusades. This is because it meant that due to the Muslims not being united they lost many battles which helped the Christians recapture Jerusalem. However it can’t be said that Muslim disunity was not the only reason for the success of the first crusade, this is because there are other factors such as religious beliefs and the supernatural, such as having relics and seeing spirits, the tactics and leadership of the people that led the crusades as well as the help that the Christians received from the Byzantium emperor, Alexius…

    • 924 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Asdfghji

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Crusades, both Christians and Muslims believed that God was on their side. They both felt justified in using violence to win or to keep the Holy Land. The following excerpts show their belief in the rightness of their deeds.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusades Dbq Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Holy Land was a very important piece of land to the Christians because of The Great Temple. This caused the Christians to create the Crusaders taking serious measures to gain back the Holy Land. On the other hand, the Muslims believed that the land was not the Christian's property and believed the attack was unfair. The bloodbath that took place in this confrontation was very violent with the favor leaning towards the Christians. The scene that happened at Jerusalem was very bloody and had many different views and…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Crusaders Influence

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Albeit, the Crusaders left a memorable architectural imprint on the Holy Land. Compared to the rest of the Land, the Crusaders left a more minor effect on Jerusalem. Meinhardt describes the renewal of the Dome of the Rock, symbolic to both the Jews and the Muslims as the rock where Abraham sacrificed Isaac and where Muhammad saw heaven: “they later covered the massive rock inside the building with elaborate marble casing, to serve as an altar; they also filled the building’s niches with sacred carvings, erected an intricate iron grille around the building’s inner octagon, and placed an iron cross on top of the dome.” Among other works, Crusaders built a covered market, a city gate, and a hospital, along with various other buildings (“When Crusader Kings Ruled Jerusalem”). One also views the growth of Jerusalem into a crossroads for learning. It allowed the Crusaders to come into contact with the profoundly advanced intellectual culture of the Middle East. In fact, one might suggest that because of Jerusalem, Crusaders quickly came into contact with other civilizations, setting up Europe for the Renaissance. Jerusalem, nestled in much of the combat, while allowing for the wealth of Europe, ultimately suffered as a result of the Crusades. A far-reaching aspect of the Crusades’ effect on Jerusalem remains in the minds of individuals of the modern day and age: the massacre of the city in 1099. After reading a modern account of Jewish historians, one might still sense understandable bias and unsettlement towards the Crusaders. As stated by Riley-Smith, “the fact is that holy war, whatever the religion involved, has the tendency to turn in on the society that has bred it” (25). In this case, it seems that modern opinions turn against the depicted brutal and greedy Christians. The…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ways religious people perceive the crusades in different religion differ from one another. For many Christian the crusades were a force of reconquering the “holy land”. However, for many other people such as Muslims and Jews the crusades were a catastrophic destruction of their beliefs. The crusades during the 11th and 16th for many people had different motives. For people, who were attacked by Christians the crusades meant something very different from the people, who were conquering and killing people on “the name of God”. During these times, people began to feel confuse because they did not know the “real” purpose of the actions of the Christians. On the other hand, Christian felt competent and glorious because they had the power to order and perform on the name of God. In the text by Fulcher of Chartres, one can see how what the crusades signified for the Christian population, and why they perform the way, they did. On the other hand, in text written by Solomon Bar Simson one can experience how the Jews community felt regarding the crusades. In addition, one can see how these texts have differences when describing the reasons behind and why the crusades happened.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a poem written by Abu I- Musaffar al Abiwardi, a poet during this time of war, he states, “We have mingled blood with flowing tears, and there is no room left for pity.” What Abiwardi means by this statement is that since the Christians have hurt them so badly that this is all the more reason to start defending themselves. Again, all of these actions the Christians have made against the Muslims are solely for the reason that they want to recapture the holy land. In the end, all that matters to either side of the argument is to retain or recapture Jerusalem, not to impact the world positively in any…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By considering the concepts above, it clearly shows that both had different intentions from its many viewing points. However, Muslims tend to show an unrighteous side towards the affects that the Christians had constructed. The Muslims indicated a strong will of unjustification towards its attacks. In 1187, Saladin once more triumphed Jerusalem and most of the Holy Land. Hearing its news, Richard the Lion Heart began the Third Crusade to vanquish the city once and for all. Arriving in 1191, he massacres and held the Muslims as prisoners. Saladin feared that his approaching plans of conquer would definitely cause his empire to collapse therefore, he offered agreements. Nonetheless, Richard stated an execution to be held for the Muslim defenders. Their agreement never worked out accordingly. (Richard) In addition, the Muslims had a better rebuttal for ruling Jerusalem. Muhammad had conquered the “Holy Land.” The Christian power was being dissolved at that time and the Muslims had a period of peace. This is significant because it explains how the Muslims came to occupy the land before the Christians had. They later came back and declared war to regain the city they thought to be theirs also intended to weaken Muslim forces. (Translation) Lastly, the Western scholars indicated bias towards the Christians leaving this unjust to the Muslims to a greater extent. They “highlighted the Christian desire to rule the Holy Lands” (Juma). This clearly proves that the Muslims were unsatisfied with this…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    -p. 26 Frankish king and Roman bishop both believed that if only the Roman Empire could be restored peace and order might once more reign. Church and empire, religion and the state were to be as two mighty swords employed in the same holy cause…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rich with history, The Middle East is the birthplace of the worlds largest religion and home to the Arab peoples. The Arab peoples close ties to Islam greatly effected how they grew together and intertwined themselves so deeply that most laws and traditions practiced by Arabs are closely connected to the Islamic faith.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays