Preview

The Crusades Dbq Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Crusades Dbq Essay
“I am writing a book about the Crusades so dull that I can scarcely write it.”(Hilaire Belloc). This is very true because the Crusades did not have a lot of kid friendly material and were very violent. The army that lead the attack was filled with “ten of thousands of peasants, nobles, and clergy responded to Urban II’s call.”(The First Crusaders PowerPoint). Jerusalem was a holy ground for the Christians and was taken by the Muslims. When the Crusaders entered Jerusalem, a bloodbath commenced with different Muslims views, Crusaders views, and reasons supporting the attack.
To understand the reason behind the attacks, one must know about each side's history. “The first of the Crusades began in 1095, when armies of Christians from Western Europe
…show more content…
“Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies...On this day, the children of the apostles regained the city and fatherland for God and the fathers.”(Document A). The Crusaders also believed that God was on their side which allowed the Christians to stand up victorious. The huge temple became one of the reasons that the city had suffered from “unbelievers” because the temple was built for christian reasons. The document even states that “the children of apostles” were jumping in joy after the victory which showed the importance of the victory. The Document later states that the men had to step over the bodies which can also be interpreted as a lot of loss for the …show more content…
The Holy Land was a very important piece of land to the Christians because of The Great Temple. This caused the Christians to create the Crusaders taking serious measures to gain back the Holy Land. On the other hand, the Muslims believed that the land was not the Christian's property and believed the attack was unfair. The bloodbath that took place in this confrontation was very violent with the favor leaning towards the Christians. The scene that happened at Jerusalem was very bloody and had many different views and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Causes Of The Crusades

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Popes were determined to recover Jerusalem, as they believed it was Christian territory. The Christians had seen Jerusalem as a significant place for Christianity as they described it as being “the centre of the earth”. This is because it was “glorified by his burial” and emphasises the importance of Jerusalem for Christians. Men who went and fought in Jerusalem also know as “the Holy Land” were given spiritual rewards which were to “have immediate remission of sins” therefore you were given a passport to heaven despite having committed multiple sins in the past. The result of the fall of Edessa to Muslims caused Pope Eugene the second to start the second crusade. Similarly to the First Crusade, the Muslims were still threatening to retake the Holy Land. The want and need for securing Jerusalem was a high priority for the Christians as it signified a meaningful place and symbolises their…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most significant and remarkable incidents of the Middle Ages was the series of conflicts known collectively as the Crusades. Generally these conflicts were militant pilgrimages to the Levant (though sometimes elsewhere) undertaken by medieval Europeans in the name of Christendom. Though there were many political and social issues involved in the whole affair, the primary theme, however superficial, was religious. The adversaries in these “wars” were non-Christians, namely Muslims, who were widely seen as the oppressors of Eastern Christians. Those engaged in the Crusades, especially the authorities preaching and administering them, believed that the Saracens (Turks, Arabs, etc) were intruding on lands that were inherently Christian. Two important primary source texts which explain this justification for war are Robert of Rheims’ account of Urban’s Speech at Clermont and La Chanson d’Antioche (The Song of Antioch) by Graindor de Douai. Though they are very different types of sources, written at different times and for different purposes, they both illustrate the reasons why Crusaders felt they were fighting for land that was rightfully theirs.…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    DBQ crusades

    • 1109 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the crusades political leaders and writers used religion as a way to persuade people to join the fight. Their ways of persuasion were to fight against Gods' enemies, who were the Turks, Franks, and Arabs. People who invaded other Christian and Islamic lands to conquer them, killing many of their people in the process. Documents one, two, four, and five show the way the political leaders and writers had put the image of the attackers into their people's minds. Leaders such as Pope Urban II, Ekkehard, Saladin and Solomon described the attackers in ill manners. They would agree and describe the attackers as “barbaric”, “enemies”, “demonic.” These descriptions had persuaded audiences (their people) to join the fight against the “demons” of their “Holy City.” What even motivated some people, especially the Christians, were the deals the Pope had given them, such as serfs being liberated from their ties to the manors. The subjects had to fight for the land that they stand on to continue being good Christians. If you died fighting for this, you would get instant remission of sins, meaning you would be forgiven for all of their sins. After the fight, the crusaders had stayed in the holy city and realized how corrupt the church was when they found out the promises the Pope gave them where just white lies. They abandoned the church rules and started living on…

    • 1109 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the 4th Crusade was so bad, it caused many problems for the people of Jerusalem. The 4th Crusade was very negative. It was so, for a lot of reasons. It was a very tragic time. Some people might have thought of this time as positive, but there might not have been anything positive in these articles to some people. The only things that was mentioned that was positive, was that went the traders went to trade, they brought back new material, and better food. That was about the only positive thing that was mentioned. For these reasons, the 4th Crusade was a very tragic…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusaders Summary

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Empathy is shown towards the affected Muslims, but also towards the thousands of Crusaders who were blindly led to believe that what they were doing was the only way to earn a place in Heaven, therefore justifying their violent wrongdoings. The focus is on their original intentions, which were good because they were trying to regain land for Christ. “As we aim to represent the image of Christ however, there will be times when the truth of His word will not always sound appealing, but it will always remain necessary. The Crusades were intended for good, but as humanity tends to do, they were altered from their course because of violent…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Syllabus Vs Crusades

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pope’s speech specifically gave the crusaders permission to kill Muslims, and only Muslims. However, the crusaders massacred as many as 25,000 Jews on their way to Constantinople, and killed almost all of the Jews in Jerusalem. Furthermore, Pope Urban specifically said in his speech, “carry aid promptly to those Christians and… destroy that vile race from the land of our friends.” The crusaders were supposed to go help the Christians put down the Turks, but many Christians ended up getting killed anyway. After they successfully besieged Antioch, the crusaders began to raid the cities near Antioch, one of which was Ma’arat al-Nu’man. At Ma’arat al Nu’man, the crusaders were driven to eating Muslim bodies, or cannibalism. “After the siege of Ma’arrat an Nu’man (December 1098) Muslim graves were dug up and the bodies slit open to check if any treasure had been swallowed. Acts of a similarly brutal nature were repeated elsewhere”(Phillips 6). This clear violation shows that many crusaders’ motive to go on the Crusade was definitely not religious…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Underlying causes: The reason for the crusades was a war between Christians and Muslims which centered around the city of Jerusalem. The City of Jerusalem held a Holy significance to the Christian religion. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem commemorated the hill of crucifixion and the tomb of Christ's burial and was visited by Pilgrims. Also another underlying cause of the crusades was that the Turks had been making constant advances in the East, and were now threatening Constantinople itself. The Christians felt as if their safety was in danger they sent rulers sent letter to the Pope asking for aid against the infidels, representing that, unless assistance was extended immediately, the capital with all its holy relics must soon fall into the hands of the barbarians.…

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Crusaders Influence

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Albeit, the Crusaders left a memorable architectural imprint on the Holy Land. Compared to the rest of the Land, the Crusaders left a more minor effect on Jerusalem. Meinhardt describes the renewal of the Dome of the Rock, symbolic to both the Jews and the Muslims as the rock where Abraham sacrificed Isaac and where Muhammad saw heaven: “they later covered the massive rock inside the building with elaborate marble casing, to serve as an altar; they also filled the building’s niches with sacred carvings, erected an intricate iron grille around the building’s inner octagon, and placed an iron cross on top of the dome.” Among other works, Crusaders built a covered market, a city gate, and a hospital, along with various other buildings (“When Crusader Kings Ruled Jerusalem”). One also views the growth of Jerusalem into a crossroads for learning. It allowed the Crusaders to come into contact with the profoundly advanced intellectual culture of the Middle East. In fact, one might suggest that because of Jerusalem, Crusaders quickly came into contact with other civilizations, setting up Europe for the Renaissance. Jerusalem, nestled in much of the combat, while allowing for the wealth of Europe, ultimately suffered as a result of the Crusades. A far-reaching aspect of the Crusades’ effect on Jerusalem remains in the minds of individuals of the modern day and age: the massacre of the city in 1099. After reading a modern account of Jewish historians, one might still sense understandable bias and unsettlement towards the Crusaders. As stated by Riley-Smith, “the fact is that holy war, whatever the religion involved, has the tendency to turn in on the society that has bred it” (25). In this case, it seems that modern opinions turn against the depicted brutal and greedy Christians. The…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two major purposes of the Crusades were the desire to indicate how Christianity is more superior to another religion and domination of lands. The Crusades were prominently known as the Holy Wars between the Christians and Muslims. In addition, religious conflicts and wars between Christianity and Muslim resulted in a prolong battle within the Western civilization. Many people from lower class to higher-class citizens, who strongly believed in Christianity and its interpretation of salvation, were all participated in retrieving the liberation in the Holy Land. Most of the Christians perceived that they needed more lands for their children to inherit, and that Muslims were not worthy to rule the Holy Land. In fact, the Holy Land was prosperous…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ways religious people perceive the crusades in different religion differ from one another. For many Christian the crusades were a force of reconquering the “holy land”. However, for many other people such as Muslims and Jews the crusades were a catastrophic destruction of their beliefs. The crusades during the 11th and 16th for many people had different motives. For people, who were attacked by Christians the crusades meant something very different from the people, who were conquering and killing people on “the name of God”. During these times, people began to feel confuse because they did not know the “real” purpose of the actions of the Christians. On the other hand, Christian felt competent and glorious because they had the power to order and perform on the name of God. In the text by Fulcher of Chartres, one can see how what the crusades signified for the Christian population, and why they perform the way, they did. On the other hand, in text written by Solomon Bar Simson one can experience how the Jews community felt regarding the crusades. In addition, one can see how these texts have differences when describing the reasons behind and why the crusades happened.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crusades were a series of religious battles fought in the 11th century between Christians and the Muslims. The third crusade, fought between Saladin and Richard the lion hearted between June7 and July 15, was critical for the Muslims. It was the third crusade which was fought between two very influential political leaders, Saladin Ayubi and Richard the lion hearted. Saladin led a series of expeditions to bring, Jerusalem, the third holiest city back under the Muslim control. This would allow the Muslims to reconcile once again both religiously and politically.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a poem written by Abu I- Musaffar al Abiwardi, a poet during this time of war, he states, “We have mingled blood with flowing tears, and there is no room left for pity.” What Abiwardi means by this statement is that since the Christians have hurt them so badly that this is all the more reason to start defending themselves. Again, all of these actions the Christians have made against the Muslims are solely for the reason that they want to recapture the holy land. In the end, all that matters to either side of the argument is to retain or recapture Jerusalem, not to impact the world positively in any…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general portrayal of the Crusades as unprovoked aggression against a peaceful and sophisticated world is a misconception; a myth. Far from being unprovoked, then, the crusades were actually the first great western Christian counterattack against Muslim attacks which had taken place continually from the inception of Islam until the eleventh century, and which continued on thereafter. Today scholars are still trying to work out the full truth and influences behind the Crusades, but the Christians at the time were not on a campaign of intolerance and malice. There was a real threat from…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crusade, or the “Holy War” was a medieval military expedition between the Europeans and the Muslims. Their main goal was to conquer the Holy Land, as it will give the conqueror prosperity. Pope Urban II was known for starting the First Crusade which begun in 1096 and lasted till 1099. Within this period of time, chaos and destruction was unavoidable. With both sides having their own schemes of conquer, this resulted to be an endless blood striving battle for control. Despite the clever tactics of the Christians, their attacks toward the Muslims were unjustified.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crusaders continued an on-going fight for 200 years just to keep regaining land and power. As important as obeying God was, these Christians began to feel a wave of competition and need for defeating the Muslims to make sure they didn’t gain anymore power than they did. In the same concept, the Crusaders were able to increase the power of feudal monarchs and soon developed rights to collect more taxes to support their mission ( Ellis…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays