Preview

Understanding Libel Quiz

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1364 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Understanding Libel Quiz
1. The BG News publishes an article that says the journalism department in the School of Communication Studies arbitrarily decides which professors will get merit raises and fails to keep good accounting records of department expenses. The department decides to sue the BG News for libel. An important element of the case will be: 1. Whether the department is large enough for the professors to be identified in connection with the defamation. 2. Whether Dr. Ekstrand deserves the biggest raise. 3. Whether the article was published. 4. Whether the department is small enough for the professors to be identified in connection with the defamation.

2. Which of the following statements about a libel suit brought against an Ohio television station is accurate? 1. there can be no libel without proving fault 2. a public official plaintiff bears the burden of proof of fault 3. broadcast stories are subject to the same rules regarding libel law as newspapers 4. all the above

3. The statute of limitations for libel suits in Ohio is 1. ten years 2. two years 3. five years 4. one year

4. In most cases, the plaintiff has to prove falsity of the statements made about him in a libel suit. The only exception to this is when: 1. The defamation is not about a public controversy. 2. The defamation is about a public controversy. 3. The defendant assumes the responsibility for proving truth. 4. A judge believes that the defendant should prove truth.

5. A defendant in a libel case MUST prove all of the following EXCEPT: 1. Truth 2. Opinion 3. Fair Report 4. The defendant isn’t required to prove anything. He has, however, a series of defenses available to him in a libel case.

6. In Gertz v. Robert Welch (1974), the U.S. Supreme Court established that private person libel plaintiffs must 1. prove strict liability 2. prove actual malice 3. prove a standard of fault to be determined by the states, usually

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The five elements pertaining to the establishing a false claim under the False Claims Act must determine that the claim was falsely submitted and that it was submitted knowingly. The government must establish that the individual submits the claim with actual knowledge, in deliberate ignorance, or recklessly disregarding for the claim’s falsity or truth (Cleverley, p.90). The statute establishes the following elements which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction:…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LP6.2 Lien v. Lien

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    F. What allegations did Bruce Lien assert his complaint in the civil action that he brought against the corporation and the other members of the board of directors in April 2000?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    D. CLIENT’S FACTS/STORY: BE AS DETAILED AS YOU CAN BE. INCLUDE DAMAGES AND ALL NAMES TOLD BY CLIENT…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eposito Case

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for?…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nadel Et Al

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williamson V Houston

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The IAD investigation determined that there was no basis for Williamson’s allegations. Williamson sued the City of Houston under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act for hostile work environment sexual harassment and for retaliation against her for reporting the harassment. In a District Court, a jury found the city liable for both sexual harassment and for retaliation. Williamson was awarded back pay and compensatory damages, as well as court costs and attorney’s fees. On appeal to the Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, the City of Houston challenged the judgment on the grounds that it did not have notice of the harassment until April 1992 and that her notification to her supervisor should not have constituted notice to the city. The District Court’s ruling was affirmed by the Appeals Court. 3. Main Issue: Can a supervisor’s knowledge of harassing behavior be imputed to the city to show that the city knew, or should have known, of the harassing behavior and can therefore be held liable for failing to stop the behavior? 4. Court Deciding: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. 5. Decision: Summary judgment affirming the decision of the District…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for? (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A fiduciary duty is an enhanced duty of care that flows from a relationship of special…

    • 3682 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    you are the judge paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My Decision as the Judge. "You be the Judge", who should prevail (win the case) and what legal rules…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Opening Statement

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    - state the legal elements to be proven (go to the law library to find this)…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hillsborough Disaster

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages

    [6] Hooper, D, Reputations Under Fire: Winners and Losers in the Libel Business (1st, Warner, London 2000) 15…

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liable: false written things against someone and slander is false spoken things against someone. If it is parody or satire, it is not…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics