Preview

Answers To Ch 3 Exercises BL150

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3682 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Answers To Ch 3 Exercises BL150
Chapter 3: Tort Law
Exercises
True or False?
1.

The standard of proof for tort actions is on a balance of probabilities. (T)

2.

Many actions that were originally torts have become offences under provincial statutes. (T)

3.

To prove that a defendant has committed a tort, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant's actions were the sole cause of the harm. (F)

4.

A fiduciary duty is an enhanced duty of care that flows from a relationship of special trust. (T)

5.

The burden of proving a tort defence, such as voluntary assumption of risk, is on the plaintiff. (F)

6.

The law assesses professional negligence according to the "reasonable professional" standard. (T)

7.

An unlimited right to privacy is constitutionally recognized in Canada. (F)

8.

Defamation in writing is called slander. (F)

9.

The tort of assault involves violent touching. (F)

10. The Negligence Act codified the common-law concept of contributory negligence into a statutory provision (T)
11. If a business operates in a context of unusual risk and offers an activity to patrons, it may be required to exceed the “normal” or “typical” safety procedures common for that kind of business. (T)

Multiple Choice
1.

Contributory negligence
a.

means that the plaintiff was partially at fault for the harm he suffered

Canadian Business Law, 2nd Edition, Instructor's Guide
© 2012 Emond Montgomery Publications

1

2.

3.

4.

b.

must be proven by the defendant

c.

can, if proven, limit the defendant's liability in tort

d.

all of the above

Remedies available for torts include
a.

prison sentences and damages

b.

specific performance and injunctions

c.

damages and injunctions

d.

restraining orders and restitution

Pecuniary losses recoverable in a tort action can include
a.

medical expenses

b.

the cost of lost work time

c.

the loss of future earnings because of a disabling injury

d.

all of the above

Negligence is established only when the plaintiff proves that the defendant could

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to sue in negligence, the plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) the existence of a legal duty to act reasonably owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; (2) the breach of that legal duty by the defendant by acting or failing to act in a certain way, (3) injury to the plaintiff cause by the defendant’s actions (or inactions); and (4) proximate cause.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4.) The individual with genotype AaBbCCDdEE can make many kinds of gametes. Which of the following is the major reason?…

    • 495 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lowe Case Study

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The doctrine of primary assumption of the risk is when the plaintiff has voluntarily and knowingly engaged in an inherently risky activity like sports and the defendant owes the plaintiff no legal duty to protect against those inherent risk that caused his or her…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Installing Fedora/RHEL is the process of copying operating system files from a CD, DVD, or USB flash drive to hard disks on a system and setting up configuration files so Linux runs properly on the hardware. Several types of installations are possible, including fresh installations, upgrades from older releases of Fedora/RHEL, and dual-boot installations.…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. A live system gives you a chance to preview Fedora without installing it. It does not write/install to hard disks.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “9. If there were 32 subjects in the experimental group and 36 subjects in the control group, why is the income data only reported for 30 subjects in the experimental group and 34 subjects in the control group?”…

    • 485 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exercise 1-9 Final Exam

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    can phone in or mail in your exam. If you’re unable to take the exam…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This document PHL 458 Week 2 Discussion Questions 3 has solutions of the following question: "How do you measure or analyze multiple creative solutions to your own problems? "…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    En1320 Unit 3 Exercise 5

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jane: Yeah, when I first come to Australian I was so shy to talk to local people, and I can’t even buy a coffee.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Answers To Assignment 2 1

    • 2996 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Be Sure to submit these assignments by 09/27/2014 on BlackBoard, under “Assignment-Week 2. Answers must be labeled properly, with all pertinent information. No late submissions will be accepted.…

    • 2996 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    although sex has a biological foundation, sexual practices vary from place to place as an element of culture.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paralegals may practise in all areas of law that lawyers do provided they are licensed…

    • 1357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion Questions

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a negligence suit, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant did not act as a reasonable person would have acted under the circumstances. The court will instruct the jury as to the standard of conduct required of the defendant. For example, a defendant sued for negligent driving is judged according to how a reasonable person would have driven in the same circumstances. A plaintiff has a variety of means of proving that a defendant did not act as the hypothetical reasonable person would have acted. The plaintiff can show that the defendant violated a statute designed to protect against the type of injury that occurred to the plaintiff. Also, a plaintiff might introduce expert witnesses, evidence of a customary practice, or circumstantial evidence.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SAMPLE EXAM 3 2010

    • 3549 Words
    • 16 Pages

    A) I only B) II only C) both I and II D) Neither I nor II…

    • 3549 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. That as a direct and proximate result of the negligence of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was injured.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics