Editorial One did not take advantage of all the techniques at hand to make its argument effective.Editorial One had presented an overall claim, and supported it with reasons such as the financial burden from …show more content…
Editorial One lacked a counterclaim, which is a very important aspect of an argumentative essay. It also did not clearly convey its position in the debate, which made it hard for the reader to understand its argument. Although Editorial One used some of the argumentative techniques well, it left out others which ultimately made the argument less effective. "
Editorial Two effectively conveys its position in the debate by utilizing all of the argumentative techniques. Editorial Two effectively uses argumentation and rhetorical appeals to convey the purpose. The editorial presents a clear structure that consists of a claim, reason and evidence, and a counterclaim. The editorial also uses rhetorical appeals such as logos, pathos, and ethos, as well as statistical evidence. The editorial also presents a clear counterclaim that addresses how most argue that a Universal System is a great idea. The author then follows up on the counterclaim by addressing how there is no solution for how to pay for health care and proving that the counter argument is flawed. All of these techniques together created an objective argument that presented a clear position on the