Preview

Transformation of Judiciary System

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Transformation of Judiciary System
The call by some senior members of the African National Congress for the transformation of the Judiciary doesn’t compromise judicial independence

Introduction

In the trias politica, every arm of government has equal power compared to other arms of the government. However, to make sure that all the arms of government in the trias politica have equal powers they must be accountable to each other. That means they must implement the oversight to one another so that no arm of government ends up with greater powers than others in the trias politica. A call by ANC or any member of any political party for the transformation of the Judiciary doesn’t compromise judicial independence but implementing the oversight to the Judiciary as it is one of the arms of government in the trias politica.

For it is the fact that not even one arm of government should be powerful than the other, it raises questions when it comes to the case of the Judiciary. African National Congress (ANC) transformation of the Judiciary doesn’t necessarily mean that it compromises the independence of the Judiciary but it implements the oversight and tries to call for change where necessary. ANC’s Document of the transformation of the Judiciary is done following all the prescriptions of the constitution and they have sound reasons. When ANC agrees on a bill they all agree to it not some certain members of the party because if that was the case there was going to be a severe conflict among themselves.

Complying with the constitution respectively gives the ANC as part of arms of government the right to propose anything in the Legislature and the Judiciary constitutionally. The Protection of State Information Bill and Transformation of Judiciary are done to serve the interests of the citizens of the country and the entire party has agreed in favor of these bills no matter who brought them into attention or came out with them. It is not who came with the idea that counts but what counts is that who voted



Bibliography: March 23, 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The judiciary has had major reforms implemented since 2005 under the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 which aimed to enhance the independence of judges from the legislature and executive.…

    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination of the partisan politics, political sponsorship as well as the influence of money when compared to the method that is currently in use.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions- A Comparative View. (2005). (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge). [24 April 2007].…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the entrenchment of the Charter impacted the judiciary to become more powerful, but also through the concept of judicial supremacy as opposed to parliamentary supremacy. First of all, “ the concept of judicial supremacy does not focus on the specific act of review itself. Judicial supremacy refers to the “obligation of coordinate officials not only to obey that [judicial] ruling but to follow its reasoning in future deliberations” (qtd. Whittington. par: 12). Essentially, judicial supremacy allows judges to make any “ constitutional authority and stems directly from the 1982 Constitution Act”(Clio’s Current, par: 1). Whereas parliamentary supremacy refers to the legislative body being the supreme leaders, and law-makers in relationship…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, the freedom of the judiciary brach to set precedents equal in importance to the law, especially on the controversial issues mentioned in the C.C.R.F., actually diminishes Canada’s democratic nature. Because they are not elected, judges do not have to be sensitive to the will of the…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    U.S History

    • 22373 Words
    • 118 Pages

    In determining that the Judiciary Act was in violation of the Constitution by adding on…

    • 22373 Words
    • 118 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similarly, some would say judges do not need power as The European Convention of Human Rights has changed the power of judges drastically. By providing…

    • 1318 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judiciary Process

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    himself because he’s mad at his son for what he did but still loves him.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the election of judges is withdrawn as a means to appointment a candidate into office, then judges would serve on the bench for the sake of duty rather than service to the community. Electing officials into office empowers members of the voting community by giving registered voters the opportunity to select a representative who can address the concerns of the citizens. Voters expect judges to be authoritative officials who address legal matters in hopes that communities and lives will be protected from wrongdoing. It…

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evolution of Court System

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States court system has evolved in many ways since its inception. While there are many issues that courts and court administrators face in today 's society, the U.S. court system has improved immensely and can continue to improve in the future. Through the evaluation of the evolution of the United States court system 's handling of victim 's rights during court proceedings, one can better understand how the court system will deal with the future management of issues, as well as other trends that will occur in areas such as language interpretation services. Historically, the United States court system functioned in a manner that is very different from the ways in which it functions today. One of the stark differences between the U.S. court system of yesterday and the U.S. court system of today was its general focus. Though the United States court systems began, during colonial times, to focus their punitive efforts in restoring the losses of victims of crimes, from the 1850 's to the early 1970 's, much of the focus of the United States court systems became creating punishments that scared criminals who committed crimes into becoming upright citizens (Derene, et al, 2007). The United States court systems are based on a mixture of many cultural principles of justice, which influenced how punishments were handed down by the courts (Derene, et al, 2007). Many of the principles of the court system were based on Roman principles, which focused on the administration of public laws, laws that “dealt with the organization and administration of the Republic,” as well as private laws, which “addressed issues such as contracts; possession and other property rights; injuries to citizens; and the legal status of various persons, such as slaves, husbands, and wives (Derene, et al, 2007).” Using these principles along with other principles that were adopted by other companies, United States court systems based many of their judgments on the idea that restitution was…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    rule of law in singapore

    • 4261 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Judiciary has the responsibility not to interfere with or obstruct the lawful policies of an elected government. Only by doing so, the judiciary uphold the “rule of law” in the interest of good government and the welfare and happiness of the people.…

    • 4261 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays