Preview

To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political change?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1067 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political change?
To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-14? – Sam Puckey

During the period of the four dumas, of 1906-14, the regime re-established its control through harsh repression, but also brought in some significant reforms to reduce the likelihood of another revolution. Whether these measures went far enough to do this is doubtful, but their impact is impossible to judge accurately because new problems caused by the WWI confuse the picture. Peter Stolypin, the Tsar’s chief minister until his assassination in 1911, was the key figure in the period. In this essay I will discuss how far Russia changed economically and politically and to what extent.

There was a large amount of repression in the period of 1906-14. The army, police and Black Hundreds had taken repressive measures in mopping up revolutionaries in late 1905, but government terror continued in 1906-07 to deal with the peasant uprisings, which continued to flare up in these years, encouraged by the SRs. It is believed that over 1,000 government officials were murdered in 1907. Stolypin met terror with terror, hanging over 1,000 in the six months between Oct. 1906 and May 1907, which caused the nickname “Stolypin’s neckties” In 1908-09 a further 3,600 death sentences were handed out and some 4,500 people sentenced to hard labour in prison camps. Between 1906-12 1,000 newspapers were closed down and 600 trade unions wound up. The result of all this was to restore law and order. The repression shows how the

However there was a significant change in the agriculture of Russia in 1906-14. Stolypin succeeded in creating a more prosperous class of peasants free from the restrictions of the commune. To leave a commune, a peasant no longer needed permission from the majority of its members. The Peasant Land Bank was instructed to loan money to freed peasants and redemption payments were cancelled in 1907. In 1910, any commune where no land had been redistributed since 1861 was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By 1881, Russia had greatly changed. Reforms had been carried out, creating less of a gap between the social classes, and making society a fairer place. There were also developments in industry, helping Russia catch up with the western world. However, the country was still ruled in a way that out pleasing the autocracy over helping the peasants, and there was still not total freedom for everyone.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsarism thrived for hundreds of years but as Russians became more educated they decided that communism and a dictatorship was too harsh and after a few revolutions Tsarism was a thing from the past. In the years 1881 to 1905 many things changed in Russia for the better and for the worse.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll became Tsar in 1855 after succeeding Tsar Nicholas l and was regarded as a “liberator” throughout his time as Tsar, until an attempted assassination attempt on him in 1866 were he turned more reactionary. Alexander ll was assassinated in March 1881, he was not radical and believed in a slow and progressive change, due to this he gathered much opposition to him and was eventually killed by The Peoples Will, and this kicked off ‘the era of great reforms’ [5].…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event developed Russian government and society up to the 21st century has been so tremendous that they cannot be disregarded. However when one considers the argument of the likes of Louis Hobart who suggests the event was only a contributing element to ‘the social and economic transformation’ it must be asked to what extent was this event alone a key turning point in the development of Russian Government?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the 1905 revolution Russia was in need of reforms both economically and politically, to allow it maintain its role of a great power and to prevent another revolution occurring the answer to this was the October Manifesto. However, due to the stubbornness of the Tsar who was determined not to relinquish his autocratic powers, what may have appeared as reforms were largely superficial making little change in particular to the Russian political system.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    But Witte still needed to get loans from abroad due to the lack of capital. This helped to increase foreign investments and business confidence. In addition it helped the currency fo not having ups and downs.Finally a new rouble…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Russian Revolution of February 1917 was not directly attributed to the Tsar’s failure to solve economic problems. There were a wide range of causes to the downfall which can’t be directly associated to the failure to solve economic problems.…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia Change over Time

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1700, serfdom had been what Eastern European society was based on in Russia. Serfs were tied to the land as a limited form of slavery. While forms of democracy was spreading across the globe in the late 1700s, Russia was behind and barely affected by the new ways of nationalism inspired by the French Revolution. However, Alexander II had serfdom abolished in the 1861 because he did not believe a country could compete in the modern world if it was based on slavery. However, although serfdom had ended, the status of the peasants did not as remnants of the class structure remained and the liberated serfs remained at the bottom of the social ladder. By the 1860s, when Russia was industrializing, the role the lower class played in society would shift as the liberated serfs moved to the cities to seek work in the factories. This change exists because of the severe hardships in the rural population due to increased taxes on the land. The…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Russian economy is universally declared to have been a thoroughly backward prior to 1890s therefore it is highly likely that there was economic improvement in the given period; however the extent of this is difficult to define due to the varying manifestations of economic improvement and the independence with which they may occur. The finance minister during this period was Sergei Witte, and to him the majority of the improvements are credited, yet the improvement was not universal. Whether this was him personally or simply a product the awful conditions which the Russian economy rose from is to be decided.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the period from 1906-1914 Russia had appeared to have stabilised due to the social reforms brought in by Stolypin. However this only really created the illusion of stability due to many underlying problems that led to the 1905 revolution not being dealt with, therefore Russia had stabilised very little in this period which in turn would lead to further unrest in the future.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period previous to 1906 was one of great instability in Russia, 1905 saw a failed revolution after long term tensions. Stolypin was effective yet ruthless in his peasant control in the 1905 revolution and due to this he soon became chairman of ministers in 1906. He introduced many new policies in an attempt to stabilise Russia, though as to if these were effective remains debatable. Stabilising Russia would surely mean a stronger economy, few or no uprisings, modernised methods in both government and agriculture and workers in towns and the country would see an improvement to their lives.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays