Preview

Title Vii Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Title Vii Paper
How Title VII Affects the Workplace Paper
The last decade has produced an explosion of racial employment discrimination lawsuits. These lawsuits have resulted in record-breaking settlements. By federally mandating every business to review the history, impact and proposed policy of Article VII these lawsuits may subside. Reviewing Title VII is a step corporate America must soon make or continue to loose much needed revenue. Our team will discuss the history of Title VII, the impact of Title VII in the workplace, who is and who is not covered under Title VII as well as propose policies that companies should have in place to avoid Title VII violations.
The Evolution of Title VII and its Amendments
Title VII covers many issues under employee's rights regarding the Civil Right Act of 1964, however there other titles created under this Act (Bennett-Alexander, D., & Hartman, L., 2007). "The Civil Rights Acts of 1964 also created the legal basis for nondiscrimination in voting, education, public accommodation and federally assisted programs" (Bennett-Alexander, D., & Hartman, L., 2007). When slavery ended our country was forced to develop a bond with people that had no social or legal relationship with the rest of the world. Because of this separation, Jim Crow laws were developed. This law regulated the separation of blacks and whites in every aspect of life and therefore discrimination was practiced. Racial discrimination was the driving force behind the enactment of Title VII which states that "(1) it shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex or national origin. (2) limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of



References: Bennett-Alexander, D., & Hartman, L. (2007, Ch. 2, 7). Employment law for business. Retrieved October 1, 2007, from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary/content/eReader.h EEOC. (1997). Discriminatory Practices. Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/vii.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. In order for an employee to present a prima facie case for national origin discrimination, an employee would have to have prima facie evidence sufficient enough for a decision or verdict to be…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ‘ makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer.. To discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin” (204). The language of the law makes it clear that discrimination is considered unlawful, regardless if a firm’s stance on the issue or whether it states it does not want its employees to be harassed since under Title VII, firms are accountable for workplace behavior. Furthermore, firms under Title VII have a legal responsibility to monitor their employees’ behavior to ensure discrimination is not occurring in the workplace. Therefore, an employee cannot be “ acting on their own,” because he is a representative of the firm he / she works at and as a result his actions make the firm legally…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did the Title VII section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (updated in 1991) go far enough and provide adequate protection for the U.S. workforce? For the vast majority of states, the answer is a resounding yes; most states defer to the federal legislation for employment-related discrimination laws. There are, however, a handful of states that have enacted their own versions of Title VII; in doing so, they are effectively saying that no, Title VII does not meet the needs of our state. One state that has enacted its own form of employment discrimination laws is Florida; in 1992, the Florida Legislature passed the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Section 760.10 specifically addresses many of the same issues covered by Title VII protections. What is the same, and what is different, between the two Acts? This paper will summarize the two sets of laws, describe the similarities, and detail the distinct differences between Title VI, the federal law, and Section 760.10 of the Florida law.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Act protects individuals from unfair labor practices such as discrimination with regards to race, sex, or religion. In addition to prohibiting employment discrimination Title VII also prohibits harassment and a hostile work environment. It was the violation of Title VII with regards to sexual harassment that facilitated the legal action of Beth Ann Faragher against her employer the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. Because of the civil rights act, Faragher was able to take the city to court and share what happened to her. Unfortunately all your able to do is take people like this to court and hope for the best. But the city of Boca Raton feels that they did nothing wrong because they 're not the ones who did the offense but they are the ones who re wrote the law in that department.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination of employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin (see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2[31]). Title VII also prohibits discrimination against an individual because of his or her association with another individual of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 29, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a controversial five to four decision in Ricci v. DeStefano. The case of Ricci vs DeStefano raises the uncomfortable but common question of how far will employers go to favor one race over another? In other words, discrimination was at play in the case, in a scenario that will be unexpected to readers. The case of Frank Ricci vs. John DeStefano was established through an invalid act in the case of firefighters, promoting firefighters to be precise.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hrm 546 Cost Club One

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). Employment Business Law (5th ed.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Retrieved from United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title Vii Case

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Title VII states that it is an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Mary has now vowed to not hire ANY while males in her department after Paul made a backhand comment about why they downsized 25% of their white male workforce in order to be more HR compliant. Paul now feels that that was a wrong decision and that they should hire more white males. Also, Mary is guilty…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Bennett-Alexander & Hartman (2015) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, training, promotion, discipline, and other workplace decisions on the basis of employee or applicant’s race, color, gender, national origin, or religion” (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, p. 111). The Civil Rights Act of 1991 have been extended to Title VII’s coverage to U.S. Citizens employed by American employers outside of the United States (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015).…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D. D. & Hartman, P. L. (2007). Employment law for business (5th Ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment discrimination occurs when an employee is rebuked based on factors that have no bearing on job performance. Traits such as race, religion, gender, and national origin are all elements that can be the basis of discrimination in hiring, firing, promotion, and other employment decisions. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act integrates the two principles of disparate treatment and disparate impact. Disparate treatment is when an employee is treated differently due to the factors mentioned above. Whereas disparate impact specifies the broader scope of employer policies that yield a negative impact on many employees with the traits mentioned above.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title VII is a section of the Civil Rights Act that applies to employment decisions and mandates that they cannot be based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2010) Discrimination is present when the employee is treated unfavorably because of their different appearance, believes or background. For example religious discrimination involves treating an employee or a job candidate unfair because of his/her religious believes. “Religion” is very broadly defined in the law to include all religious observances, practices and beliefs. Not only traditional and familiar churches of Christianity, Judaism or Islam can be considered religion, but also a small spiritual or ritual group of people with new and uncommon…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    know your rights

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and various state anti-discrimination laws prohibits discrimination in employment based on sex, as well as race, nation origin and religion (29 USC sec 621-634). Coincident to the advent of the title VII, sweeping economic and social trends included, if not compelled women’s entry into the national…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics