Preview

Walmart, Inc. V. Dukes Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Walmart, Inc. V. Dukes Summary
Wal-Mart, Inc v. Dukes

Issues:

Does the discretion exercised by Wal-Marts, local supervisors over pay and promotion matters violate title VII by discriminating against women?

Should the case be classified as a class action suit?

Rule:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination of employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin (see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2[31]). Title VII also prohibits discrimination against an individual because of his or her association with another individual of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.

Rule

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff’s, 19-year-old Elli Lake and 20-year-old Melissa Weber were photographed nude, by Weber’s sister, when they were showering together while on vacation in Mexico. Upon return from their vacation, Lake and Weber brought their vacation film to Wal-Mart’s photo lab for developing. When they picked up their developed photos, there was a note from Wal-Mart enclosed with the photos and negatives stating that one or more photos had not been printed due to the nature of the photo. Through friends and acquaintances, Lake and Weber’s had learned a Wal-Mart employee had been sharing a copy of their nude photo, and were later informed a copy or copies of the photograph continued circulate through their community.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ‘ makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer.. To discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin” (204). The language of the law makes it clear that discrimination is considered unlawful, regardless if a firm’s stance on the issue or whether it states it does not want its employees to be harassed since under Title VII, firms are accountable for workplace behavior. Furthermore, firms under Title VII have a legal responsibility to monitor their employees’ behavior to ensure discrimination is not occurring in the workplace. Therefore, an employee cannot be “ acting on their own,” because he is a representative of the firm he / she works at and as a result his actions make the firm legally…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Act protects individuals from unfair labor practices such as discrimination with regards to race, sex, or religion. In addition to prohibiting employment discrimination Title VII also prohibits harassment and a hostile work environment. It was the violation of Title VII with regards to sexual harassment that facilitated the legal action of Beth Ann Faragher against her employer the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. Because of the civil rights act, Faragher was able to take the city to court and share what happened to her. Unfortunately all your able to do is take people like this to court and hope for the best. But the city of Boca Raton feels that they did nothing wrong because they 're not the ones who did the offense but they are the ones who re wrote the law in that department.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    JDT Task1 Essay Example

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 law makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. The law also makes it illegal to retaliate against a person because the person participated in an employment discrimination investigation, filed a charge of discrimination or complained about discrimination.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) speaks about discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title Vii Case

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Title VII states that it is an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Mary has now vowed to not hire ANY while males in her department after Paul made a backhand comment about why they downsized 25% of their white male workforce in order to be more HR compliant. Paul now feels that that was a wrong decision and that they should hire more white males. Also, Mary is guilty…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Bennett-Alexander & Hartman (2015) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, training, promotion, discipline, and other workplace decisions on the basis of employee or applicant’s race, color, gender, national origin, or religion” (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, p. 111). The Civil Rights Act of 1991 have been extended to Title VII’s coverage to U.S. Citizens employed by American employers outside of the United States (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015).…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate treatment prohibits employers from treating applicants or employees differently because of their membership in a class protected by Title VII. The central issue is whether the employer's actions were motivated by discriminatory intent, which may be proved by either direct or circumstantial evidence. Disparate treatment is considered intentional discrimination and the employer may not say they are discriminating. The U.S. Supreme Court has a list of indicators that leave discrimination as the only explanation when every other explanation is eliminated: (1) The plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination; (2) the employer must then articulate, through admissible evidence, a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions; and (3) in order to prevail, the plaintiff must prove that the employer's stated reason is a pretext to hide discrimination. (http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G701.htm. This is called direct method - burden-shifting. In disparate treatment cases, the employer's policy is discriminatory on its face (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman, 95). McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green 411 U.S. 792 (1973) is a case that shows disparate…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labor relations are a part of our daily lives, whether we realize it or not. For those of us who work, it relates to our wages, the hours that we work and the way we are treated as an employee of an organization, no matter how large or small.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is unlawful for any employer to discriminate by refusing to hire or discharge any person and or discriminate any person relating to wages, terms and conditions, or privileges of employment due to race, color, creed or national origin. It is unlawful to segregate or classify any employee and deprive them of equal employment opportunities and cause due harm which will affect their status as an employee based on their race, color, creed or national origin. [Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 200e-2(a).]…

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The year 1971 played a significant role in the shaping of American laws regarding employee discrimination in the form of disparate impact illustrated by the U.S. Supreme Court case Griggs vs. Duke Power Co (401 US 424). Up until the 1970’s, Duke Power Plant was paying their highest black employees less than the lowest paid white person in any other department. As well, right after Title VII became effective Duke Power Co. implemented certain requirements for employment along with possible department transfers for blacks only. The…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law prohibits employers from discriminating their employees on the basis of religion, race, sex, color, and national origin. Since Mrs. Ledbetter was paid significantly less than her male employees at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. it is evident that she felt she was a victim of gender discrimination, and thus filed a complaint against Goodyear for violating the Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Dunlap brought suit under Title VII, alleging racial discrimination by the TVA. The district court found that Dunlap had been subjected to discrimination under both disparate treatment and disparate impact analyses, concluding that TVA’s subjective hiring processes permitted racial bias against both Dunlap and other black applicants (Walsh, 2010). The Appeals Court affirmed the disparate treatment claim, reversed the disparate impact claim, and affirmed the district court’s award of damages and fees to Mr. Dunlap (Walsh, 2010).…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays