Preview

Third Punic War by Polybiusachilles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
887 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Third Punic War by Polybiusachilles
Third Punic War by Polybius
• Historical Figures: o Polybius: Greek historian born in Arcadia c. 200 BCE. He was the son of the Calvary Commander of the Achaean League, and a close friend of commander Scipio Aemilianus. Polybius wrote The Histories- a work which describes the rise of the Republic of Rome and its eventual domination of Greece. o Mago Brettius: Gave a speech on the Carthaginians and the errors they made when surrendering o Hamilcar Phameas: Carthagian Calvary Commander o Massanissa: Numidian King who repeatedly encroached on Carthagian territory. o Hasdrubal: Carthaginian general who lost the 3rd Punic War to Scipio Aemilianus at the Siege of Carthage in 146 BCE. o Gulussa: Massanissa’s son, ascended to the throne following Massanissa’s death o Scipio Aemilianus: As Consul, he commanded the final siege of Carthage in 146 BCE
• Key Events: o Ultimatum between Rome and Carthage o Carthaginian surrender o Greece debates over the cause, the conduct, and the justification of the war o Hasdrubal encouters Scipio and makes it clear that he is only looking out for his own safety o Scipio conquers Carthage
• Points: o The Carthaginians had to make a choice. There was "a choice of two evils only left, to accept war with courage or to surrender their independence." o There was a great schism between the onlookers of the war: “The opinions expressed in regard to the Carthaginians were widely divided, and indicated entirely opposite views.” o The last two books emphasize the flaws of Hasdrubal. His vanity and self-involvement lead to his city’s destruction o Scipio’s speech reveals his fear of Rome.
• Summary: o Polybius explains how he wrote his narrative and his beliefs on how historians should record history in the introduction to Book XXXVI of The Histories. After introducing his narrative Polybius begins to explain the Third Punic War through accounts of each side’s actions, significant speeches, and his own observations.
o

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To be able to understand to what extent Themistocles was responsible for Greek victory in the Persian Wars it first needs to be discussed how he rose to the position of authority and developed the skills that were required of him to make such a substantial impact on the war effort. For as Aristotle said many years later, ‘If you would understand anything, observe its beginning and its development.’ It is evident that Themistocles’ early life reflects his character and his decisive actions seen later in his life.…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    a. The Punic Wars are considered one of the most important Wars in the entire history of Western Civilization. Why?…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hannibal resumed his siege of Saguntum and conquered it after a terrible and costly siege. Hannibal, although he held preeminence in Carthage, still had to rely on his allies to keep him in power. A delegate was sent to Rome to answer a question regarding whether Hannibal had acted on his own or had the approval of the Carthaginian senate. The delegate, according to Livy, was the best orator in Carthage. He quickly quashed the argument regarding the border of Hasdrubal because the Carthaginian council had not been part of the talks. Furthermore, he argued that the Romans had broken the treaty after the First War by invading Sardinia; finally, he stated that Hannibal broke no treaty because the Saguntines did not have an alliance with Rome when the treaty between Hasdrubal formed. However, the Romans did not care about that, they wanted peace or war. The Carthaginians declared the Romans needed to choose, and the Romans chose the later. At this critical juncture, Carthage still held with Hannibal and wanted to help him.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast Scipio Africanus’s contribution to the Second Punic War was more substantial and recognised. Firstly we are introduced to Scipio when he saves his Father at the Ticinus River. Experiencing Hannibal’s tactics first hand would given Scipio a greater advantage later on. Scipio’s firstly victory was when he managed to severely weaken Hasbrudal’s…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Army DBQ

    • 1692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “I came, I saw, I conquered” ­ Julius Ceasar (BrainyQuote). Julius Ceasar was a great…

    • 1692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    At the end of Hannibal’s career as a military commander of Carthage, a main enemy of Rome, it can be said that his career was a failure as he did not achieve his primary objective, the taking of Rome. However, his military achievements glittered and shone because he struck fear into Rome and he also earned himself a place in the modern world as the father of strategy. Hannibal will always be remembered and regarded as one of the greatest military tacticians and strategists in all of European history and is considered one of the greatest generals of the Ancient World. It was his superior strategy and tactical skills that allowed him to compete with and almost defeat Rome, but this greatness prevented him achieving his ultimate goal, because he could not take the major military risk that was actually required to defeat Rome when it was in a weakened state. For this reason, it a fair assessment to say that Hannibal’s career was a failure but of the most glittering kind, because while he failed to take Rome, he left a substantial legacy that was even more important in terms of the shaping of the ancient world.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herodotus, who many call the “father of history,” had no schooling or historical records to study as Plutarch did. The narrative he wrote consisted of stories he gathered from different lands that had been passed down from generation to generation. Also he was not biased toward the Greeks as Plutarch was (Dutton, Marchand, and Harkness, 37-39). Other ancient historians, such as Thucydides and Xenophon, wrote about events that occurred in their own time as opposed to the past. Like Herodotus, they did not have schooling or written historical records to study. Unlike Herdotus, they did not claim that gods had a hand in historical events (History.com, “Thucydides”). None of these ancient historians were educated in philosophy or rhetoric like Plutarch was. Plutarch also differed from these historians in that he was the first historian to use comparative analysis. He was also the first historian to write about the thought and behavior of his subjects, which added a new dimension to historical writing (Halkias, "Why Plutarch Matters"). Plutarch stretched the truth and distorted quotes in favor of his own arguments. He was more interested in getting his point across than being historically accurate, although his writing was undoubtedly much more accurate than that of…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Barry Strauss

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Barry Strauss’, “The Trojan War: A New History”, he discusses a topic that has been talked about for thousands of years, yet is able to bring new interpretations and arguments about it. While Strauss shows that many of the accepted ideas about the Trojan War can be disproved, he also fails to support his claims with adequate historical references and analyzes.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Among the most renowned literary works are those of the ancient Greeks. Literary works by the ancient Greeks include historical documentation, along with tragedies based on conflicts. According to the historian Thucydides, the greatest conflict was the Peloponnesian war between the Athenians and Spartans, along with each of their allies. In the opinion of Thucydides, the Peloponnesian war was due to the growth of Athens and the fear, the growth caused in the Spartans and their allies (Thucydides, Book I, chapter I). Accounts of events by Thucydides, for Francis Cornford, are not merely historic, but rather works of art. The History of the Peloponnesian War according to Thucydides is artistic through carefully crafted speeches and captivating…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydides Paper

    • 753 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thucydides, one of the great historians, recorded several years of war between Sparta and Athens. “History of the Peloponnesian War,” in which he was the writer, used different methods of investigating and writing his history. He combined several sources into one fascinating voice that is his own. Thucydides methods included balance, accuracy and objectivity, and how he reached his findings that makes it an historical classification.…

    • 753 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydides is the best source of knowledge we have about the Peloponnesian war. He was a general for the Athenians, and he documented everything that happened during the war. It is a miracle that he and his documentations survived the war, as all of the other Athen generals were killed.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mla Work Cited

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smith, Joshua, Ph.D. "Those Insufferable Greeks." Ed. James Wygonik. Infamous World Empires. Colonial Press of Denver, (1983): 201-47. Print.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Punic Wars are a series of three wars that took place between Carthage and Rome. The war lasted nearly a century (265 B.C.-146 B.C.) At that time The Punic Wars were the largest wars in the world, almost as close to World Wars. The word Punic comes from the the latin word Punicus meaning “Carthaginian.”…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pericles

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thucydides who lived from (c. 460-c. 400 B.C) helped to contribute to our understanding of why history happened the way that it did. He applied reason to the understanding of history by coming up with a positive, creative way to explain history while enlightening further generations so that history would not repeat its self. Thucydides also helped to give background to the purpose of Pericles’s proposal. Pericles wanted to make sure that in his speech he gave a proper analysis on the Peloponnesian War in order to prevent some sort of reoccurrence from generation to generation. According to Thucydides the Spartans jealousy and fear over the sudden increase in power for the Athens are what caused the Peloponnesian War. To Pericles, the Peloponnesian War arose because Sparta and the Peloponnesian states felt that a forceful and imperialistic Athens endangered their independence. He already saw it coming before it…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Rage Of Achilles

    • 2924 Words
    • 12 Pages

    We begin the Iiad with Achilles already in a rage as victory in the Trojan War, the epic confrontation between Ilium and Hellas sprung from the Trojan abduction of Helen of Troy from her lawful Greek husband Menelaus, looms overhead, the Greeks having finally sacked one of the last remaining Trojan allied towns and now preparing to march on the glorious city of Troy itself. In the looting of the town the Greek King Agamemnon had claimed Chryseis as a war prize while Achilles claimed Briseis. The father of Chryseis, a man by the name of Chryses who was a priest of Apollo, having pleaded for his daughters return and having been rebuffed by Agamemnon soon called upon his god for aid who unleashed a series of plagues on the Greek…

    • 2924 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays