Preview

‘His Career Was a Failure but of the Most Glittering Kind.’ Is This a Fair Assessment of Hannibal? Analyse Hannibal’s Greatness and the Reasons for His Ultimate Failure.

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1874 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘His Career Was a Failure but of the Most Glittering Kind.’ Is This a Fair Assessment of Hannibal? Analyse Hannibal’s Greatness and the Reasons for His Ultimate Failure.
At the end of Hannibal’s career as a military commander of Carthage, a main enemy of Rome, it can be said that his career was a failure as he did not achieve his primary objective, the taking of Rome. However, his military achievements glittered and shone because he struck fear into Rome and he also earned himself a place in the modern world as the father of strategy. Hannibal will always be remembered and regarded as one of the greatest military tacticians and strategists in all of European history and is considered one of the greatest generals of the Ancient World. It was his superior strategy and tactical skills that allowed him to compete with and almost defeat Rome, but this greatness prevented him achieving his ultimate goal, because he could not take the major military risk that was actually required to defeat Rome when it was in a weakened state. For this reason, it a fair assessment to say that Hannibal’s career was a failure but of the most glittering kind, because while he failed to take Rome, he left a substantial legacy that was even more important in terms of the shaping of the ancient world.
Hannibal’s greatness is revealed as a military tactician, strategist and logistics expert. He excelled in these areas, and this is best demonstrated at the battle of Cannae. Coming up against a superiorly sized Roman army who were hoping to gain success through pure strength in numbers. “While the Romans enjoyed a superiority over Hannibal in terms of numbers, they nonetheless lacked a great deal in terms of competent leadership and experience.” (Hannibal Crosses the Alps, 2001, pg. 187) However, Hannibal used brilliant tactics, and with a vast inferiority in numbers Hannibal’s forces were able to surround and destroy all but a small remnant of his enemy “Roman military power was utterly destroyed at Cannae” (Ancient Rome: Using Evidence, 1990, p.150). The superiority in tactics that Hannibal showed at Cannae, caused the Roman’s to become very hesitant to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hannibal became a Carthaginian statesman and eventually grew in power. The Romans were scared that with Hannibal’s increase in power, he would lead another revolt against them. They made Hannibal give up his power and they exiled him. Hannibal traveled to many places including Tyrus, Ephesus, Crete, and Asia Minor. In Ephesus, King Antiochus, was at war with the Romans. Antiochus put Hannibal in control of one if his fleets, but he was defeated. After this, Antiochus was prepared to give Hannibal to the forces of Rome. Hannibal then fled to Crete, after a while, Hannibal was ready to go back to Asia Minor. King Prusias let Hannibal stay with him and Hannibal helped him in the war against Rome’s allies. Hannibal won many victories for Prusias, but the Romans let Hannibal keep helping him. They forced Prusias to hand Hannibal over. Hannibal was not ready to fall into the hands of the Romans. In 183 B.C. Hannibal ingested a deadly poison and…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One general, wreaking havoc throughout the Roman lands was known as Hannibal Barca. Following in his father’s footsteps as a superior military general, he challenged Rome in battle every chance he could. After several attempts of coaxing Rome into battle he achieves a decent victory at the Battle of Trasimene in 217…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This exhausting conflict was, according to Caven, a ‘contest in three rounds’ in which the Romans fought first for control of Sicily, then for the leadership of the western Mediterranean and finally to determine the survival or extinction of Carthage.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fabius Maximus had continuous criticism from his peers on his strategy, which was considered cowardly “ Meanwhile in Italy the skilful delaying tactics of Fabius had achieved a brief respite from the non-stop run of Roman military disasters” quoted from Livy. His role in the course of the Second Punic War was a Dictator. Knowing of Hannibal’s military led Maximus to take a new approach, he refused to meet Hannibal in a pitched battle, hoping he would outlast him in a war of attrition, Hannibal foraging parties were harassed, which limited Hannibal’s ability to wreak destruction, this favoured Maximus’s soldiers. Maximus navigated his way through the hills Livy: 'Fabius kept on high ground, at a moderate distance from the enemy, so that he never lost sight of him and never closed with him'. Hannibal’s Calvary were terrorised, enemy supplies were cut off and harassed him, also implanting the “ scorched earth tactics” to prevent Hannibal from gaining grain and resources. Maximus’s contribution to the course of the Second Punic War was very significant as he helped bring Hannibal to his end.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Morey, W. C. (1901), Carthage had a greater power, prestige, and influential navy, but Rome had a more efficient army. He also stated that Carthage had more extremely intelligent leaders, while Rome had a more immovable body of citizens. The main strength of Carthage had sufficiently rested in her wealth and commercial resources. On the other hand, Rome rely upon the character of her people and her well-organized political system. The notably large in size of the Carthaginians was shown in their successes, while the great multitudes of the Romans were most fully displayed in the dark hours of destruction and trial.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I have just spoken with Hannibal, he assures me that another conflict with Rome will end in their defeat and Carthage standing on top, victorious. We have already discussed strategy and there is virtually no way we can lose. We will strike where they are vulnerable. Their arrogance will be their downfall. Rome was determined to extend their reach as far north as the Alps and they have instigated conflict with the Gauls over this region. They feel that securing this area will create an impassible barrier to their north with their armies and navy securing the southern regions. They would never expect an assault from the north; especially one from us. Hannibal has been in contact with the Gauls and has their support. Our two regions are now allies. We have already proposed plans for an invasion with full support by the Gauls and the Gallic tribes.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the end, Hannibal was able to cut his losses and carry on with his march through Italy, but with great losses to his army; non expendable losses that would cost him the…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hannibal Barca (247-183/182 BC) “excited, frightened and – once safely dead – drew reluctant admiration from the Romans” (Hoyos, 2008). For an historian to assess Hannibal’s legacy they would need to acknowledge both his immediate impact on the Mediterranean world and his lasting influence on Rome. The most immediate effect Hannibal had on his time stemmed from his involvement in the Punic Wars. The tactics he employed and the threat he posed to Rome, led to changes in their military and magistracies and his influence in Carthage was to oversee it becoming “energetically outward-looking… constantly evolving and… more and more attuned to Hellenistic Greek civilization (Hoyos, 2008).…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If I could choose a role model it would be Hannibal Smith from the A-Team. To begin, Hannibal will always be there for the A-Team. Whether is into a huge firefight, or escaping high-security prisons, Hannibal will be there to save the day. I look up to his leadership, and his care for the A-Team. Secondly, Hannibal Smith knows how to put together a plan, and execute it (he loves it when a plan comes together). The A-Team consists of 4 members, and together with Smith creating the plan they are a force to be reckoned. Smith has improvised tons of plans that saved the whole team, and without him, the A-Team couldn’t exist. And finally, Hannibal experience in the US military. Hannibal Smith served in the Vietnam War, and received countless medals…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, few names have been able to stand the test of time. Through political achievements and bloody military conquests Julius Caesar rose to power in one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen. Caesar’s Gallic campaign is to this day one of the most successful military campaigns in history, adding enormous wealth and power not only to Rome but to himself. His legions loved him, his enemies feared him, and Rome was never to be the same because of him. Julius Caesar is one of the greatest military commanders in history.…

    • 2556 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of 2nd Punic War

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The ancient sources written by Livy, Polybius Dio Cassius and Appian place a great deal of blame on Hannibal in starting the Second Punic War. Though some of the authors justify his actions to an extent, Hannibal’s invasion of Saguntum is pinpointed as the immediate cause of the Second Punic War. Dio Cassius and Appian find little sympathy in the motives behind Hannibal’s actions. As discussed by each of the writers, Hannibal’s father, after the loss of Sicily, harbored extreme hatred toward the Romans and instilled these feelings into Hannibal from a very young age. All four authors mention an oath taken by Hannibal at age nine in which he vowed revenge against the Romans for their unjust actions. Livy writes that this oath “bound Hannibal to prove himself, as soon as he could, an enemy to the Roman people” (Kagan 93-94, 1975). Sure enough, upon ascending to power, “as if Italy had been decreed to him as his province, and the war with Rome committed to him,” (Kagan 95, 1975) Hannibal…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To better understand Hannibal’s rise to greatness one needs to look into his father’s history. After Carthage 's defeat in the First Punic War, Hamilcar set out to improve his family 's and Carthage 's fortunes. With that in mind and supported by Gades, Hamilcar began the subjugation of the tribes of the Iberian Peninsula. Carthage at the time was in such a poor state that its navy was unable to transport his army to Iberia (Hispania); instead, Hamilcar had to march it towards the Pillars of Hercules and transport it across the Strait of Gibraltar.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the Roman Empire swept across the Ancient world many men fought and stood against them, Vercingetorex a Gallic warrior and Chieftain Is one of the most memorable. Reasons for his revolt against Julius Caesar vary between historians and sources, was he a man who fought to maintain common freedom? Or is he to be dismissed as an agitator whose rebellion was an act of terrorism and disruption? By viewing the tactics he used we can start to understand why his revolt against Caesar failed further more we see where at times Vercingetorex achieved great accomplishments. The discovery of his drive for the revolt and its ill-fated fail are both essential parts to learning more about this renowned warrior. A man that earned respect not only by his enemies but whose name has been carried have carried into modern society.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Napoleonic wars remains to be one of the most significant and influential periods in history, an era where the concept of the decisive battle the causes of which bear a great importance in the further evolution and later development of warfare and which resulted in a dramatic shift in the international relations in Europe. This essay will analyse the sole driving factor in the inception of the battles which is the factor of Napoleon’s unique and formidable personality. However, it could be argued that the underlying reasons behind this lie in forces beyond Bonaparte’s control. MAKE INTO ACTUAL SENTENCE Such factors include old regime rivalries, the hostile climate of warfare as brought about by the French revolution, which in turn left a foreign policy legacy with incomplete ambitions and forced Napoleon to carry it out. This essay will take a thematic approach rather than a chronology of battles. Context of French revolution napoleon’s…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays