Preview

The Validity Of Wikipedia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Validity Of Wikipedia
Setting aside various issues, Wikipedia has proven to be unreliable compared to its’ edited counterparts such as journals or encyclopedias. These mediums are weighed as acceptable sources because of how extensively they are analyzed by professionals through a peer-review process. Wikipedia is completely unprotected, therefore anyone who wishes to edit an article, and this takes away any validity the articles might have. Articles have also been found to include legitimate inaccuracies, and the speed at which they have corrected said inaccuracies ranges widely from immediately addressed to entirely looked over. Biased politically-charged incentives also prove to illustrate a very one-dimensional approach when researching themes. Dilemmas can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; providing facts, advice, and opinions from one or more contributors. Although it provides users with a vast amount of information there is often no citation for the facts, which does not allow the reader to confirm the credibility of the record. The mere fact that anyone can manipulate the content submitted allows some readers to challenge the website information as biased or fabricated. Credentials are an important aspect of research; providing information only on topics in which they publish on their website.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past twelve years there has been a great controversy on whether or not the website Wikipedia is reliable enough to get sources that are accurate enough to believe. Many seem quick to judge whether or not if Wikipedia is a credible source and cites the necessary about to make it a reliable source to get information from. In the article “Wikipedia”(2013), unknown authors inform the general public about the Wikipedia website. The authors provide evidence on who updates their information, site their sources and include references. The purpose of Wikipedia is to persuade users to use the website. Wikipedia targets the general public to use their website for a non-profit organization. Wikipedia is a reliable source because it cites its sources and gives knowledgeable facts.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wikipedia is known as an unreliable site due to numerous amount of editorial adjustments on each article by unknown editors that may contain errors. The articles should not be used to make critical decisions, because you don’t know who wrote the information, and the source of the data could be false. Individuals can create malicious entries, and people with agendas have significant editing authority which make the site untrustworthy.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In just three months, Wikipedia received 250 million fewer visitors compared to the same time last year. The officials of the free encyclopedia know about this, but they are not at…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rector, Lucy Holman. (2008). Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 22. Retrieved December 19, 2010, from the World Wide Web:…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thirdly, the writer explains how as a result of anyone being able to modify a post on Wikipedia, the chances of the user modifying his or her bias opinion is immensely high. The essayist also provides a definition of opinion making it clear to the reader that Wikipedia posts tend to be one-sided. Furthermore, Philip adds Wikipedia’s quote warning users “not to believe everything they read including the information on Wikipedia”. Philip then illustrates how political figures and subjects like abortion are slandered and vandalized on Wikipedia, making it harder for a student to find useful…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One being that the site can be changed by anyone and that persons credentials can be unknown, irrelevant or nonexistent. The sources or references listed for which the information is based on can be invalid, lack relevance or reliability. A second reason would be what was written may not necessarily had been for academic or professional audiences. Because it is unclear how many other theories were exhausted from consideration, and ideas expressed could be based entirely on biased or opinion. Lastly I would say uncertainty of the accuracy of information provided. In example, dates can be out dated, erroneous, or not based on the facts. All the before mentioned are contributing factors to why I believe Wikipedia.com is not a credible…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wikipedia is a reliable?

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the editorial, “Wikipedia” (2001), Wikipedia explains that Wikipedia is freely edit, multilingual, and free internet cyclopedia that it is supported by nonprofit Wikipedia foundation. Wikipedia supports its assertion by explaining how Wikipedia is an effort to create, and volunteers worldwide freely write their articles and using their own language. The websites purpose is to explain how Wikipedia can be used as reference data in order to anyone who can access any sites and can edit any of articles. Wikipedia has also become known as a new source because of the rapid data of articles related to breaking news. Wikipedia in the editorial, “Bruno Mars”, asserts that Bruno Mars is a one of the famous American singer and song writer as well. Wikipedia supports its assertion by explaining he is regard as a one of the successful solo artist. Wikipedia’s purpose is to inform about what his success story in order to know who he is. Wikipedia is an unreliable source for academic work because anyone can edit randomly onto this website for free and can change article’s information anytime. Moreover, main problem is still associated with the common contributors who are students rather than professors.…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, the Internet provides an unprecedented amount of information by way of blogs, videos, and podcasts. Conduct a critique of one blog, one video, and one podcast, which provide information that addresses the topic of your Final Research Paper.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays