Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

the theories of Durkheim, Merton, and Agnew regarding the Functional Theory of Crime; the Theory of Anomie, Merton’s Modes of Adaptation, Strain, and the General Strain Theory

Good Essays
940 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
the theories of Durkheim, Merton, and Agnew regarding the Functional Theory of Crime; the Theory of Anomie, Merton’s Modes of Adaptation, Strain, and the General Strain Theory
Sociologists like Emile Durkheim used the structural functional theory of crime to understand the world and why people act the way that they do. Its main thought is that our culture is a whole unit. This unit is composed of interconnected portions. Sociologists who believe theory often focus on the social structure and social function. Durkheim based primarily all his work on this theory, the structural functional theory.
Durkheim debated that deviance is a typical and essential part of our culture due to the contributions it makes to the social order. He acknowledged four purposes that deviance satisfies which include confirmation of cultural norms and values, clarification of right and wrong, union of others in society, and lastly the promotion of social change. Confirmation of cultural norms and values is when society judges what is acceptable or unacceptable in society by seeing a person punished for a deviant crime or act. When society sees someone sent to prison for shoplifting, it affirms for them that it is wrong and unacceptable.
The clarification of right and wrong is the distinguishing what is right and what is wrong as a response to deviant behavior. The union of others in society is the response to deviant that can bring people together. A prime example of this was when the bombs went out in Boston during the marathon. People across the Boston, and even across the country, were unified in the shock and heartache over the attack. Lastly, the promotion of social change is the encouragement from society of deviant act that are alternative to the common norms and values. In 1955, Rosa Parks sat in the front of the bus in the white only section. At the time of era this was an act of deviance in which led the Supreme Court to declare it was unconstitutional for any type of segregation on public transportation.
During the 1960's, sociologist Robert Merton began using the term anomie which refers to the confusion that occurs when social norms are conflicted or even nonexistent. Merton used the word to define the differences between socially accepted goals and the attainability of resources to achieve those goals. Robert Merton stressed that accomplishing wealth is a major goal of our culture, but not everyone is able to get the correct means to do so. This is why many members of minorities or people who are disadvantaged have committed deviant acts.
The primary contribution of anomie theory is its ability to explain many forms of deviance. The theory is also sociological in its emphasis on the role of social forces in creating deviance. On the negative side, anomie theory has been criticized for its generality. Critics note the theory's lack of statements concerning the process of learning deviance, including the internal motivators for deviance.
Merton's five modes of adaptation include, Conformity, Innovation, Ritualism, Retreatism, and Rebellion. Conformity is the first of five modes of adaptation to anomie strain. It is the most common response from an individual. Individuals admit to society’s goals and educational resources. Those who conform to these goals and standards of society are less likely to become deviant than those that do not conform.
Innovation is where individuals harmonize with their cultural goals but instead discover their own means. Individuals that innovate have the greatest likelihood of becoming a criminal. Persons who deal with ritualism often have the belief that society’s goals are unachievable. Although they feel as though society’s goal are unattainable they still consent to institutional means. They are not as likely to become a criminal but are often viewed as being odd or even deviant.
Retreatism is the total refusal of both society’s goals and institutional resources. This individual is highly likely to develop a deviant demeanor. They are also very likely to place themselves into the roller coaster ride of hard drugs and excessive alcohol consumption. And the last of Merton's five modes of adaptation includes Rebellion. It’s the refusal of accepting both cultural goals and institutional resources. These rebellious individuals are very prone to be look at in a different way from other criminals. This is because these individuals are committing deviant crimes for the best interest of others instead for their personal gratification. They attempt to change our society’s goals and means to a new standard move fitting for the current times.
Merton also developed the strain theory, this theory proposes that society’s system encourages an excessive amount of deviance. It also suggests that when an individual is prohibited from accomplishing socially accepted goals through educational means, they are very lucky to feel strained or frustrated which could have an outcome of behaving in a deviant matter. Merton also that a person could experience anomie, which are the feelings of being disconnected to society. Which is possible when an individual is unable to achieve their institutional goals due to many factors.
Lastly, Robert Agnew’s general strain theory suggests that strain causes destructive behaviors and feelings, this has the possibility of leading to multiple negative consequences. Typically, it commonly leads to delinquency. Some strains from this theory include the failure to attain positive society goals, the loss of a valuable person or item, and negative actions that society disapproves of such as physical abuse. Although there are many categories of strain, many fall into these groups. Agnew tried to identify the circumstances under what strain might direct to crime. Strains that are viewed as unjust, high in scale, affiliated with low social control, and encourages and individual to involve themselves in criminal coping have the greatest likelihood to get involved with violence and law-breaking behavior.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Durkheim’s theory a society needs deviancy so that it is able to evolve into a more desirable state. An example of this happening are seen easily in the medical practices through the eras. During the medieval times it was not normal for doctors to dissect people so they had little idea of the anatomy of humans. Normally when a person was found conducting this act they would be most likely put to death for committing what was considered a satanic act in that time. When a doctor was finally able to make some sort of map of the human anatomy it had greatly helped the medical community to take a step forward which lead to a desirable outcome.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim argued that a certain amount of crime was ‘healthy’ for society and that it is deviant behaviour that provided a catalyst for social change. He said that crime and deviance are functional because the ritual of punishment is an expressive experience that serves to bind together members of a social group and establishment a sense of community; also known as re-affirming boundaries as the resulting media coverage publicly reaffirms the existing values. They are useful in introducing necessary changes and preparing people for change – as Durkheim argues all social change begins with some form of deviance; certain crimes when prosecuted illicit public sympathy and affect change in legislation policies – Kiranjit Ahluwalia, Rosa Parks. Durkheim also put forward social cohesion, this is when certain horrific crimes are committed the entire community are drawn together in shared outrage, such as September 11th Twin Towers, often resulting in public accepting legislative changes which severely impact upon out civil liberties. However Durkheim also seen negatives aspects of Crime and Deviance named ‘Anomie’ the point when crimes becomes dysfunctional. This is a condition characterized by the breakdown of norms governing social interaction. Durkheim argues that people can only be happy when their wants are commensurate to their means. He thought that humans are basically selfish in nature and if left to their own devices would in order to satisfy their own needs, commit crime if they could get away with it. A state of anomie would therefore occur where there are insufficient social controls to ensure conformity from individuals. He argued that this would normally occur in periods of great social change or stress, where the collective conscience may be weakened.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist approach towards crime & deviance is seen as a top down approach as it looks at society as a whole, stating that criminal behaviour is caused by society itself except from being caused through an individual’s biology & psychology. Durkheim sees deviance as inevitable also being necessary for our society, however other perspectives such as Marxist & Feminist may state otherwise.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2) Functional theory- Argue that crime is a natural part of society. Stress that the sociall classes differ in opportunities for income and education, so they differ in opportunities for crime. As a result, street crime is higher among the lower social classes and white-collar crime is higher among the higher social classes. The growing crime rates of women illustrate how changing gender roles have given women more access to what sociologist call “illegitimate opportunities.”…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim believes that crime is normal, and argues there are at least two reasons why crime and deviance are found in all societies: not everyone is equally effectively socialised into the shared norms and values, so some individuals will be prone to deviate, and particularly in modern societies, there is a diversity of lifestyles and values Different groups develop their own subcultures with distinctive norms and values, and what the members of the subculture regard as normal, mainstream culture may seem as deviant.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most prominent functionalists to have lived, Durkheim, explained crime as a problem of modernity associated with the decline of mechanic solidarity, a society that is homogenous and in cohesion. In times of social change people may lose sight of the shared norms and values they’ve become accustomed too, creating a weaker collective conscience. Durkheim describes this state of ‘normlessness’ as anomie which is expressed not just through crime but, also by suicide, marital breakdown and industrial disputes. Anomie is used to describe why some people become dysfunctional in society and turn to crime. According to Durkheim, society becomes more individualistic because of anomie as people resort to what they do know, themselves, therefore not looking out for their community which would have once been the norm. However, Durkheim doesn’t acknowledge that anomie may not always result in individualism and can lead to the exact opposite. For instance, some people have formed stronger ties to their religious group in reaction to the emergence of the new media, which has caused wide scale social change.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Motives are believed to be the reason behind the action of people. Whether negative or positive, they are the cause of an individual’s action. Since motives help us better recognize why a person would do something, a lot of research has been committed to understanding the pattern of people or group of peoples motives. Knowledge of patterns is crucial to many aspects of human behavior but especially those relating to crime. Knowing a pattern helps one to predict, and hopefully help educate others on future crimes. The research of crime is so extensive that researchers have created not only theories but also various subculture theories of crime. Subculture theory of crime is a set of theories arguing that certain groups or subcultures in society have values and attitudes that are conducive to crime and violence. Subcultural theories of Cloward and Ohlin, Wolfgang and Feracuti, Elijah Anderson, and Walter Miller offer a great deal of insight on why different groups of people choose to engage in the crimes that they participate in.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. Compare the absolutist, relativist, and social power perspectives. Which perspective do you believe would best describe your approach to deviance? Why would you choose this approach? Which of these approaches exhibits the most respect for deviant’s choice of behavior? The absolutist perspective, dominated by religious settings, hold that deviance is universal and what is wrong in one place, is wrong everywhere. This tactic to describing deviance rests on the supposition that all human behavior can be considered either innately good or innately bad. Deviant acts come to define the individual’s character and can often be based on stereotypes i.e., all parents who spank are abusing their children or all Muslims are terrorists. The absolutist perspective assumes an extensive unanimity over definitions of deviance, universal norms, and taboos. Durkheim said that social laws replicate unbiased facts integrated into functionalist notions of deviance. This perspective maintains that deviance is pathological and an objective fact. Deviance is considered unethical and reproachful of social order, requiring unyielding, retributory measures.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Constructionism

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will begin by defining key terms Jewkes (2012) defines Crime as the violation of law, however it has been extended to include social harm, which is culturally relative and ultimately depends on theoretical position of those defining it. Jewkes also defines Deviance, as a social and usually moral (as opposed to legal) concept to describe rule breaking behaviour.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological theory identifies different social factors that connects individuals to crime. According to Kaska and Neuman (2008), there are 4 parts of social theory starting with assumptions, concepts, relationships, and ending with units of analysis (p. 102). There are numerous reasons why crime exists in society. Not every individual who commits a crime has the same reasoning behind why he or she does so. Theorists research different aspects on each crime and the reasoning behind them. Social theory covers different social reasons behind crime, such as economic factors, social statuses, available education in different neighborhoods, and even availability of extracurricular activities. Williams III and McShane (2010) state, “without a social theory of community, crime theories risk reducing their focus to individuals without recognizing larger forces at work” (p. 58).…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strain Theory Of Crime

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social structure theory s focus on socioeconomic and cultural values. There are three subtypes that sociologist and criminalities have identified. Social disorganization theory, strain theory and cultural transmission. Social disorganization theory focus conditions in the urban environment. A juvenile that live in a neighborhood where there is a high crime rate most likely the juvenile will be involved in criminal activities. Strain theory is obtaining money and goals illegally. Juveniles will start to steal and sell drugs instead of getting a job. Cultural deviance theory mentions people who live without necessary resources will make up their own laws that conflict with the regulated social norms. Social process theory is the view that criminality…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime Victimization Survey

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sociological Theory: Social institutions/groups create conditions that lead to behavior. Society is the root of the crime.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance In Sociology

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many sociologists have said that the sociology of deviance is dead, such as Colin Sumner in 1975. It was said that behaviors are not deviant but rather just seen as not normal in society, but the term ‘normal’ cannot exactly be defined. Deviance is a discipline in Sociology that many claim is now ‘dead’. Deviance is an act with refers to ‘norm-breaking’ in our society. A social norm is appropriate behavior for a social group and an appropriate behavior for the environment an individual is in. Deviance is the act of breaking these social norms whether it be your behavior or something you do. Once you break…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics