The Republican Party Essay
The last few months have seen several political surprises, the growing popularity of a grass roots social-democrat and an outspoken and controversial real-estate tycoon. Today, march 13th, there are four candidates for the GOP nomination and two for the Democratic. Both races are close, but nothing is for certain. Based upon polls, voter history and analysis of candidates for the democratic and republican party, who statistically could be the parties’ nominee and ultimately the next president of the united states?
The current election promises to be a historic election no matter the outcome. On the democratic side we are presented by a potential female president as well as a Jewish president. This is no small matter and would be as ground …show more content…
Known for extravagant displays of wealth, controversial statements and toupee like hair, he currently holds a betting odd of 11:4. On the other side is the established former First lady and secretary of State Hillary Clinton who has gained significant support from the black community, played largely on equality but is being challenged on her transcripts from a speech to Wall street tycoons is leading in the betting arena with a 1:2 odds. Moving back to the Republicans is Ted Cruz who is presented as a very conservative Republican in all aspects, but has been mocked on social media for his facial expressions that humans instinctively mistrust as well as jokingly called The Zodiac Killer is fairly far behind with the odds of …show more content…
Bernie Sanders could theoretically manage to get an average of 4% more pledged delegate than Hillary Clinton and the superdelegates rush to his side to enforce the democratic process of election by popular vote. Or, the current trajectory continues and Hillary Clinton wins the popular vote by a respectable margin and the superdelegates do not jump ship. The third scenario, and most unlikely, is that Clinton wins the delegates but Sanders steals the superdelegates. This raises the question of whether or not superdelegates are poisoning the Democrats “democratic”
The current election promises to be a historic election no matter the outcome. On the democratic side we are presented by a potential female president as well as a Jewish president. This is no small matter and would be as ground …show more content…
Known for extravagant displays of wealth, controversial statements and toupee like hair, he currently holds a betting odd of 11:4. On the other side is the established former First lady and secretary of State Hillary Clinton who has gained significant support from the black community, played largely on equality but is being challenged on her transcripts from a speech to Wall street tycoons is leading in the betting arena with a 1:2 odds. Moving back to the Republicans is Ted Cruz who is presented as a very conservative Republican in all aspects, but has been mocked on social media for his facial expressions that humans instinctively mistrust as well as jokingly called The Zodiac Killer is fairly far behind with the odds of …show more content…
Bernie Sanders could theoretically manage to get an average of 4% more pledged delegate than Hillary Clinton and the superdelegates rush to his side to enforce the democratic process of election by popular vote. Or, the current trajectory continues and Hillary Clinton wins the popular vote by a respectable margin and the superdelegates do not jump ship. The third scenario, and most unlikely, is that Clinton wins the delegates but Sanders steals the superdelegates. This raises the question of whether or not superdelegates are poisoning the Democrats “democratic”