Republican Party Synthesis Essay
The current process of selecting nominees is one that is flawed for a number of reasons, with lack of consistency being the main reason for the flaws. While the Democratic Party assigns its delegates proportionally, the Republican Party has its assignment of delegates vary by state, whether it’s winner-take-all, proportional, or a hybrid system, and the percentage of the popular vote in the state needed to win the delegates also varies by state. This lack of consistency usually leads campaigning efforts by a candidate to be centered around some states more than others, and possibly ignoring states completely. If states feel left out by a candidate who doesn’t feel a state is necessary for winning the nominee, supporters of that candidate in
…show more content…
The first of the processes to use would be the borda count, which allows voters to rank every candidate and that ranking would assign each candidate a point total. This starts with only 1 point for the lowest ranked candidate on the list, and then the points increase by 1 until the amount of people on the ballot is reached. If there were 4 people on the ballot, the first ranked would receive 4 points, the second highest 3 points, third highest 2 points, and lowest 1 point [5]. The second preferential method used would be an instant-runoff method. Used in several countries and even some American cities for elections of more localized government positions, the instant-runoff once again includes the ranking of candidates in terms of preference. If a candidate receives the majority of first place votes, they are considered the winner, but if the majority isn’t reached, the candidate with the lowest amount of first place votes is removed from the ballot. For the ballots that had the eliminated candidate as a first place choice, their choices move up one spot, meaning that their second preference becomes their top choice. This occurs until a candidate has the majority vote. [9] These methods help to solve the issue of wasted votes and people not wanting to vote because their preferred candidate is unlikely to
The first of the processes to use would be the borda count, which allows voters to rank every candidate and that ranking would assign each candidate a point total. This starts with only 1 point for the lowest ranked candidate on the list, and then the points increase by 1 until the amount of people on the ballot is reached. If there were 4 people on the ballot, the first ranked would receive 4 points, the second highest 3 points, third highest 2 points, and lowest 1 point [5]. The second preferential method used would be an instant-runoff method. Used in several countries and even some American cities for elections of more localized government positions, the instant-runoff once again includes the ranking of candidates in terms of preference. If a candidate receives the majority of first place votes, they are considered the winner, but if the majority isn’t reached, the candidate with the lowest amount of first place votes is removed from the ballot. For the ballots that had the eliminated candidate as a first place choice, their choices move up one spot, meaning that their second preference becomes their top choice. This occurs until a candidate has the majority vote. [9] These methods help to solve the issue of wasted votes and people not wanting to vote because their preferred candidate is unlikely to