The Red Headed Hawaiian Analysis

In the books “Big Happiness” and “The Red Headed Hawaiian” you see both authors make overall arguments about the value of being different. In the book ʻBig Happiness” the author Mark Panek gives an overall argument that we need to understand that different is ok, and in the book “The Red Headed Hawaiian” the author Rudy Puana gives the overall argument that its ok to be different. Threw out these books the author gives evidence resulting to the proof of these authors overall arguments using the rhetorical triangle: ethos, pathos, logos appeals. You also see the connection between both authors overall arguments and also the connections on the authors evidence.
In the book “The red headed Hawaiian” (53) Puana shares a scene of his childhood days,
Or Like Percy being the soft and humble person he is the type of person Boss stated he would never be he was, He was still the top of his game, he didnʻt have to be like all the other sumos he could be different.
In the book “The Red Headed Hawaiian” (25) Puana shares a passage of himself and his sisters sucesses stories of what they accomplished threw out their adult years. This is an ethos appeal, because it shows the truth, he proved that he could be different and live in Kahala. Rudy Puana became the youngest associates medical director in the cancer center MD Anderson.
In the book “Big happiness” (128) Panek shares the character Percy Kipapas success story, yes Percy may have went and came up with his own technique with sumo. But fighting all the odds Percy was very sucessful after working seven days a week for seven years straight he finally got to rest. Percy is proof that being different doesnʻt matter, “him going to Japan in the first place was different” –Shane. And we should all come to peace with that. This is the reason this a ethos