Preview

The Prosecutor's Role In Determine The Sentencing Process

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2165 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Prosecutor's Role In Determine The Sentencing Process
THE SENTENCING PROCESS * The hearing
Once the jury has determined the guilt of an offender, the jurors are dismissed and their role in the trial is over. It is now time for the second stage of the trial in which the judicial officer of the court-judge or justice-will determine the sentence imposed. The trial judge will look at many factors when determining a sentence. These factors include; the defendant’s state of mind, his or her criminal record-if any; and addiction the defendant may have, whether he or she has shown any remorse. * Evidence
The only evidence looked at during the sentencing process is that which has been presented at trial. At this time, the judicial officer may take into account prior convictions. * Role of prosecutor
The prosecutor’s role in sentencing is to present to the judicial officer all the relevant info from the case as well as the info about prior convictions and cases related to the defendant. It is their role to ensure that the defendant receives the highest possible sentence. In order to assist this process, they will also tender “victim impact statements” made by the victim or members of the victim’s family, which outline the effects of the crime upon their lives. The prosecutor’s role is also to represent the views
…show more content…
An example is that of previous offences being inadmissible at trial. One side of the argument is if the person is a repeat offender then the jury and court should be able to hear that this person ahs committed like offences in the past. Meanwhile, others argue that everyone deserves the right to a fair trial, and if the jury knows the person is a repeat offender then the judgement may be biased or skewed against the offender, and thus the defendant will not receive a fair trial. This is where the balance of individual rights and values and that of the greater good of the community come into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prosecutor must also consider the views of the victim in regard to the impact of the offence. With sexual offences the safety of victim and children must be considered.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |In other words, the prosecutor is the one who |whatever the crime is. Basically the prosecution is |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rochin Case Summary

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is hard to tell what the future holds in respect to the justice system since it is not often determined by one’s intentions, but the events people encounter as they purse their goals. Therefore, the decision of this case may affect a criminal justice professional I the sense he or she might want to maintain a strong and focused philosophy. This may involve the consideration of both crime control and due process models when dealing with some cases because the use of the two appears to be the best strategy to deal with crime in the…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sixth step is jury deliberations and verdict. This step is to remind the jurors of the laws. Each juror is to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty on each charge. There may be only one charge, but there can be more. If there is five charges against the defendant then the jurors have to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty on each charge. They all have to explain why or why not they feel the defendant is guilty on each charge.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    people who said that O.J Simpson was going to be declared guilty and yet he was acquitted. O.J…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discretion within the criminal trial process is a very important matter, as the judge or magistrate must exercise appropriate measures in order to reach a just verdict. For example the evidence presented in trial must be approved by the Judge or Magistrate in case the evidence used in court appears inadmissible or prejudicial. The Evidence Act 1995 applies court discretion within the trial process as it allows for the quality of fairness. Without the exercise of impartiality within the trial process the decision made by the jury may alter the final…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A judge will take into account the guidelines set forth by the State’s Penal Code, as well as those brought forward by the defense attorney. An offender’s criminal history, involvement in the crime, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime will all be considered in deciding whether to hand down a harsher or more lenient punishment. An offender who is considered a first-time offender may be granted leniency or a reduced sentence, but strong arguments can be made in favor and opposition of such a practice. Finally, punishment serves multiple purposes, for the victims of crime as well as the public, and the benefit for all involved should be considered. Ultimately, the judge will review all mitigating circumstances and deliver what he or she believes to be a fair sentence for each individual…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are six steps in the trial process; these steps include jury selection, opening statements, evidence presentation, closing arguments, charging of the jury and deliberation of jury. Throughout this six step process, it is vital that the rights of all parties involved and respected and protected by following due process. This is especially vital to the defendant in each case since he/she has the most to lose.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons for plea bargains. In most cases, the plea bargain is to avoid the uncertainty of the jury trial. In other cases, a defendant may have pertenant information regarding other criminals allowing the broader prosecution of other crimes. And in still other cases, prosecutors may be convinced that they have the right defendant and an accurate charge as to the crimes committed but lack the evidence necessary to bring the successful conviction against them. Regardless of the reasoning behind plea bargining, the process is brought into motion upon the descretion of the prosecutor. The empowerment of legal sentencing through the prosecutor brings many questions regarding the legitimacy of the process and the effects that it may have on the accused, regardless of guilt or innocence.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the criminal justice system, discretion is often performed by the police, prosecutors, judges and juries, correctional officials and paroling authorities. They are the ones to decide who should be the ones for criminal penalties and what kind of punishments they should be given. For example: Police are the ones who decides which person has committed grievous crimes and that the person should be arrested or not. They also decide on enforcing specific laws, examine detailed crimes, investigate crime scene locations and search criminals and victims. Prosecutors are the ones to file charges against someone with complaints. They are the ones to make an official decision about a problem or dispute. They look for a formal accusation of a serious before presenting to the grand jury. And they have the authority for reducing charges for someone. Judges or magistrates are the one to set up bails and state of affairs to release a prisoner. They accept pleas, determine criminal behavior, release paroles, enforce sentences and withdraw probation. Correctional Officials are securities who maintain protection and precautions within one institution or in prison for staffs’ and prisoners’ health and safety. They are also authorized to punish for penalizing infringements. Paroling authorities are the ones to determine the dates and conditions for paroles and invalidate paroles.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition of Evidence

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A general rule states that trial judges have the inherent power to admit or exclude evidence at trial. A judge is there to oversee the entire case and ensure that nothing gets out of control. Judges have the responsibilities to make decisions concerning the constitutionality of law enforce activities, to protect witnesses from overzealous examination and cross examination by counsel, they are also to take judicial notice, ruling on issues of law, acting as a fact finder in some cases, and lastly to determine competency of the witness and evidence admitted being brought to testify.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preservation Of Evidence

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For example, in the Arthur Whitfield case, in 1981 Arthur Whitfield was convicted of sexual assault, and accepted a plea for another rape that happened the same evening. Despite the victim describing the perpetrator that sexual assaulted her as clean cut, and Whitfield had a beard, Whitfield was convicted of rape and also with the plea he took for another rape, he was sentenced to 62 years in prison. Decades later in 2003, Arthur Whitfield filed for a motion of post-conviction DNA testing. Whitfield wasn’t allowed the opportunity of post-conviction DNA testing at the time, because unfortunately that evidence from his alleged crime and trial appeared to be destroyed. Later that year, the lab was able to find evidence from the notebook of the criminalist, and the lab later concluded that Arthur Whitfield wasn’t the perpetrator, but a third party was that was already serving a life sentence for sexual assault was the perpetrator. Whitfield was later freed after 22 years in prison of wrongful imprisonment. This example was used to demonstrate, how the preservation of evidence as well as accurate investigation can make or break a case for the better or worse. Also illustrating how trace evidence is important in cases as such, because that as well can make or break a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper explains the many trends in the public and institutional criminal justice system. These trends, starting from the past, push the research into the present and future with the implementation of continuing trends and perspective ideations to aid in the progress and advancement of criminal procedures. This paper starts with the history of community and commercial criminal justice and attaches the proceedings to the present-day standing. This paper also shows an idealistic and theoretical analogy of how the criminal justice system may look in the future based on current trends.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics