Preview

The Political Legacy Of Philip Hone: Federalist

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Political Legacy Of Philip Hone: Federalist
Philip Hone was born on October 25th 1780 in Dutch Street, New York. Hone was an hard working individual who at seventeen years old started his mercantile career. He would later progress to the auction business and began to make most of his well from this partnership. Hone traveled to places such as Europe but then decided to return home to New York. This is when he was when he began his political career and elected as mayor in 1826 and served one term. Hone political identified as a federalist at first but then changed to the Whig Party.

Legacy
One of Philip Hone’s legacy includes his well written detailed diary. Hone was an greatly influential man that dedicated his to serve the great city of New York. Little did Hone knows that the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sectional Compromises in the 19th Century
    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sectional Compromises in the 19th Century

    There are two mind paths to choose when considering the statement that the compromises of the 1800s were not really compromises, but sectional sellouts by the North, that continually gave in to the South's wishes. The first is that the compromises really were compromises, and the second is that the compromises were modes of the North selling out. Really, there is only one correct mind path of these two, and that is that the North sold out during these compromises and gave the South what it wanted for minimal returns. The three main compromises of the 19th century, the compromises of 1820 (Missouri) and 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 each were ways for the south to gain more power so that eventually, it could secede.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theodore Roosevelt's 26th: A Fascinating Person
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theodore Roosevelt's 26th: A Fascinating Person

    So things you should know first are. Born October 27, 1858 in New York. He was an effective executive, adventurer, and soldier. He had made the world a better place and put more limits in America.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Political Philosophies of the 1800s
    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Political Philosophies of the 1800s

    Two competing political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ relatively short history: one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s these two conflicting philosophies were acted out by the Federalist and the Democratic Republican parties, respectively. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, advocated the importance of a strong central government in leading the country forward, while the Democratic Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, promoted increasing the common man’s role in government. Although both political parties had good intentions for the future of the United States, the Federalist Party was much more effective at uniting the American people, avoiding domestic faction, and keeping the best interests in mind for the future of the United States.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    New Federalism: The Reagan Administration
    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page

    New Federalism: The Reagan Administration

    New Federalism was announced due to the fear that the government would take too much power. Announced in 1969 and implemented in 1980, new federalism founded under the Nixon Administration that transferred powers from the federal government back to the state. This transfer is called devolution advocated for cutting federal strings by creating block grants and managing grant aided programs. Several states supported and enjoyed due to the simplicity of collecting taxes and managing everything as well as regulating the spending. The Reagan administration confronted this with a warning to reduce Washington's role in the domestic policy.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Robert Yates Contributions
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robert Yates Contributions

    Robert Yates was an American politician and was part of the Philadelphia Convention. Yates was born on January 27, 1738 in Schenectady, NY. Between 1771 and 1775, Yates sat on the Albany board of Alderman. Robert Yates spent most of his political life as a judge, and was well regarded by New Yorkers of all political casts. During the pre-revolution years, Yates was one of the Radical Whigs, but once the revolution did break out he served on the Albany committee of safety and represented his county in four provincial congresses and in the convention of 1775-1777. At the convention he sat on various committees, including the one that drafted the first constitution for New York State.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson's Anti-Federalism
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jefferson's Anti-Federalism

    Jefferson strived to attain an efficient economy, and broaden the country’s territory. Jefferson’s anti-federalist stance determined reduced government spending on the military. He felt that if the government were to be involved in the daily lives of citizens, then they should avoid taxing the people. He cut government spending on the army and navy because he believed that it was illogical to spend money on something that was not apparent of happening. Furthermore, his beliefs of small centralized government initiated the idea that to procure a large military would commence war. By regulating military spending, the government was capable of focusing on other aspects of economic spending. Jefferson felt that government spending on the military…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Democracy and the Federalist: a Reconsideration of the Framers Intent
    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democracy and the Federalist: a Reconsideration of the Framers Intent

    The structures and protections of the US Constitution have a great deal to do with “the good life”. I believe (parts of) the Constitution was written to protect our wealth and keep the ongoing struggle to become rich a reality for all and is also an essential part of the government during its early stages as well as today.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Objections To The Anti Federalists
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Objections To The Anti Federalists

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis
    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    Forming a new government comes with challenges and obstacles that the people need to overcome for the greater good of the country. During the time that the Americans formed the government, arguments were placed into the open to be solved. Solutions that were given, many were rejected and caused a lot of disagreement. Creating a government brought the country into disagreement between the anti-federalists and federalists for the concerns of rights of the people and power that was shared among them. Firstly, the anti-federalists disagreed how the rights were to be given to one another as well as the division of power between the states. Secondly, the federalists were satisfied with the conditions that were given to them, including the power they could have and what human rights that would protect them.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Federalist And Anti-Federalists
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    During the Constitutional Period, there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists, wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution, preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis
    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    While federalists preferred a stronger central government and the Anti’s were the exact opposite a compromise was to be made in order to satisfy the majority of the people. This comprise was the bill of rights, which gives the basic freedoms to the people and limits the power of the government (consent of the governed).…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander Hamilton: The Father Of Federalism
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton: The Father Of Federalism

    Federalism was born in 1787, when Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote 85 essays known as the Federalist Papers. These political documents encouraged Americans to adopt the newly-written Constitution and its stronger central government. Hamilton along with his friends believed in ratification of the U.S. Constitution. They wanted a stronger national government, a national bank, no Bill of Rights, no state governments, and a strong executive branch. Alex grew up in South Carolina, and was born on January 11, 1755. He was a founding father to the United States. He was one of the most influential and best promoter of the ratification of the Constitution. He pursued a college education through the help of local, wealthy…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Party
    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Federalist Party

    "Seldom in the nation's history has there been a period so extraordinary in accomplishment as the first decade under the Constitution...."<br><br>This paper is going to be a step by step evaluation of arguably the most important decade in American History. The time period covered in this paper is 1789-1801. These are the years in which the Federalists had the most influence in the new government. They accomplished an amazing amount in these 12 years. <br><br>The Federalist Party was one of the first political organizations in the United States. The members of this party supported a strong central government, a large peacetime army and navy, and a stable financial system.<br><br>Although the first president, George Washington, was not a Federalist, his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, was the developer and leader of the Federalist party. Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution so that the central government could become more powerful. Also Hamilton, along with the other party members, believed that commerce and manufacturing were more important than agriculture. <br><br><b>Financial Dilemma</b><br>During the first two years of the new federal government the biggest problem was that of raising money. At first the Congress adopted a small tariff on imports. This was a start but not nearly enough. The government needed this money to maintain its own existence and to be able to pay of the debt. The existence of the government was a necessity, but there was a lot of discussion as to whether the debt should be paid…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics