Preview

The Plea Bargains In The American Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Plea Bargains In The American Criminal Justice System
One of the cornerstones of the American Criminal Justice System the sixth amendment- the right to a trial by a jury of one's peers. However, to the surprise of this audience, over 95 percent of all cases resulting in criminal convictions, in this country, never reach the ears of a jury, but instead are settled by plea bargain agreements. Plea bargains are legally binding agreements, in which the defendant exchanges guilt for a lighter sentence or reduced charge (Pollock, 2019, p.262). In the PBS documentary, The Plea, the plea bargain process is examined thoroughly in numerous criminal cases from drug indictments to capital murder. This process is highlighted, as it, is spearheaded by judges, defense attorneys and prosecutors, who are …show more content…
The use of plea bargains to resolve criminal court cases often places in jeopardy the constitutional rights of defendants. The pressure to admit guilt for the purpose of being released versus opting for a jury trial is the primary reason this form of justice is utilized. Additional reasons for plea bargaining agreements are: the overcrowding of courts, if pleas were not allowed, courts would be overwhelmed and forcibly closed. The caseload of prosecutors', with fewer trials, prosecutors’ can more effectively indict and focus on the most serious cases, and plea bargains save defendants money by not having to adequately defend themselves at trial. Although, plea bargains are critical to the judiciary process, the plea bargains presented in the film, triggered severe ethical dilemmas and ultimately postured the defendants for a lifetime …show more content…
Pasty Jarrett was just as astounding. In 1973, Ms. Jarrett and a friend took a road trip to New York. During their trip unbeknownst to Ms. Jarrett, her friend robbed and murdered a gas station employee. It would be three years after this murder before Ms. Jarrett would be arrested as an accomplice to the murder. The evidence in this case was weak against Ms. Jarrett, as there were no fingerprints or blood found. The only evidence was a single eyewitness testimony, which was unclear, that placed Ms. Jarrett at the scene of the crime. Ms. Jarret refused to admit guilt. To avoid trial, Ms. Jarrett was offered a plea bargain, she refused. Armed with belief in the American justice system and truth on her side, she proceeded forward. Ms. Jarret would be tried, convicted and sentenced to 25 years in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Court System

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    among the nation's founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free to create laws, and state court systems were needed to hear cases in which violations of those laws occurred. Today, however, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts involve themselves in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statues and federal constitutional guarantees. When that happens, claimed violations of federal due process guarantees especially those found in the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a justice system replaces jury trials with plea negotiations it contradicts the fair rules of evidence in front of a judge or a jury. Plea negotiations are very different from the formal process. Criminals end up of facing sentences that are lighter while victims are left unsatisfied. Plea Bargaining is very private which can affect the outcome and will not benefit the everybody. While the bargain might help that receive less severe penalties than a conviction at trial, the bargain may still leave you with a criminal record that can have a huge affect in the future. For example, in Erma Stewart’s case after she chose to plea guilty her entire life changed. As she explained she could not afford to pay her probation fines due to the fact…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-bargaining is a very useful tool that can be implemented by attorneys in the justice system. Attorneys can use plea-bargaining to take the decision of innocent or guilty out of the judges and jurors hands, and decide the defendant’s fate without going to trial. When researching the term plea-bargaining It is stated in the course textbook that there is no agreed-upon definition of the term plea-bargaining, However the textbook does refer to Black 's Law Dictionary 's Definition of plea-bargaining which is: “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargain after an arraignment, or even before, the defense and prosecute, on will discuss a possible guilty plea in exchange for the prosecution’s reducing or dropping some of the charges or agreeing to a request for a more lenient sentence. Almost 90 percent of cases end in plea bargain rather than a criminal trial (Siegel & Worrall, 2013).…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Law Dictionary (2013) defines “plea bargaining” as “an informal practice where the accused uses his or her right both to plead guilty in order to bargain for a benefit that is usually related to a charge or the sentence”. A plea bargain is the most common method used in the disposition of criminal cases and makes up 95% of cases in Canada (Barbara, Morrison, and Cunningham, 1976) and usually consists of an agreement with the Crown prosecutor to make an alliance to get the judge to make a sentence. In most cases plea bargaining is considered as a “deal with the devil”. In 1975, the Law Reform Commission of Canada defined "plea bargaining" as "any agreement by the accused to plead guilty in return for the promise of some benefit…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apendix D

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Court jurisdiction is determined by age |The purpose of the procedures is to punish |receive Miranda warnings. |…

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-bargaining has been practiced in the criminal justice system for over 300 years. Controversial cases have brought plea bargains to the forefront and have created bias towards this practice. However, if plea bargains were not implemented, a chaotic and expensive justice system would be created. With such cases bringing a negative view to plea-bargaining, this research paper aims to show the positives and negatives of plea-bargaining. Critics of plea-bargaining believe that sentences demonstrate to be more lenient to the defendants, contributes to the issue of mass incarceration, and how the Crown persuades defendants into pleading guilty. Nevertheless, supporters of plea bargains find that plea deals are beginning to including the victims…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The creation and application of plea bargaining in our legal system has been in existence since the early seventeenth century. However, for as long as plea bargaining has been utilized it is unclear how this process fits into our legal system. The goals of our legal system are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation or rehabilitation, however plea bargaining fails to support any of these goals (Stitt & Chaires, p.73). Currently plea bargaining is utilized in approximately 95% of all criminal cases in the United States (Walker, 2006, p. 169) and with the enforcement of due process laws plea bargaining has been institutionalized in our…

    • 5009 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A social science studying crime and related phenomenon such as law making, criminal behavior, victimization and punishment…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professionals in the criminal justice field have the discretion to make many ethical choices throughout their careers. These choices are so significant that their outcomes can determine the futures of those involved. An ethical choice that prosecutors have to make daily, revolves around plea bargaining. Plea bargains are negotiations for contracts between the prosecution and the defense in an attempt to get them to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain.”). The prosecutor offers to reduce the severity or the length of the defendant’s punishment in exchange for the defense’s agreement to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain."). Sometimes plea deals even require the defendant to testify against someone else, so that they can be convicted of a crime ("Plea Bargain.").…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many references found on the subject of plea bargaining project the same message as to why the process has become such a common element of the justice system. The universal missive seems to be advantage for all parties involved, even the victim.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 4169 Words
    • 17 Pages

    One of the cardinal principles of criminal justice is that nobody is to be compelled by threat, promise or inducement in any criminal case to be a witness against themselves. As a result, it is an uphill task for the prosecution to unearth a crime, bring the witnesses in support of his case, rebut the defense arguments and prove the case beyond all reasonable doubts.These tasks become difficult for want of resources, manpower in the prosecution, and sluggishness of government officials, political interruption and importantly pervasive corruption in the criminal justice delivery process in Bangladesh. Against this backdrop,plea-bargaining can play an important role to address many of these issues.An attempt is made here to analyze the practices of plea bargaining in different regions and in different legal systems of the world. Based on experience of other countries, several recommendations are made for incorporating it in our criminal procedure.…

    • 4169 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays