Preview

Plea Bargaining Used In The Canadian Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plea Bargaining Used In The Canadian Criminal Justice System
The Canadian Law Dictionary (2013) defines “plea bargaining” as “an informal practice where the accused uses his or her right both to plead guilty in order to bargain for a benefit that is usually related to a charge or the sentence”. A plea bargain is the most common method used in the disposition of criminal cases and makes up 95% of cases in Canada (Barbara, Morrison, and Cunningham, 1976) and usually consists of an agreement with the Crown prosecutor to make an alliance to get the judge to make a sentence. In most cases plea bargaining is considered as a “deal with the devil”.
In 1975, the Law Reform Commission of Canada defined "plea bargaining" as "any agreement by the accused to plead guilty in return for the promise of some benefit
…show more content…
Paul Bernardo, a diagnosed psychopathic and sexual sadist, murdered three women and sexually assaulted at least eighteen. During that period, the authorities did not have any admissible evidence that would identify Bernardo as the perpetrator of these crimes. On the first of February 1993, the first clue was discovered. Forensics then advised the police that there was a match between Bernardo’s DNA and some of the DNA found on the victims of the assaults. However, this was not enough to connect Bernardo to the murders, but was enough for his wife Karla Homolka, whose DNA was also found on the victims, and who was previously considered a victim of her husband’s abuse, an accomplice to his crimes. On 11 February 1993, Homolka retained a lawyer who negotiated with the prosecutor on her behalf. She had valuable information that would assist the police in officially charging Bernardo with the crime he committed, but she wanted a deal. There was a strong case built against Homolka but nothing strong enough for Bernardo’s conviction. The authorities were faced with the unpleasant fact that if Bernardo was to be prosecuted for the murders, it was essential that they have Homolka’s evidence and cooperation. In exchange for her cooperation and testimony against Bernardo, she would plead guilty to two counts of manslaughter and receive a sentence of 12 years imprisonment. Homolka was sentenced on 6 July 1993, (Bernardo, 1 September 1995) until on 22 September 1994, videotapes made by Bernardo were discovered by the police. These videotapes captured the sexual assaults that were carried by both Bernardo & Homolka against a number of victims, including the deceased victims. Homolka’s deal with the prosecutor then came under heavy public scrutiny as she no longer could be portrayed as the abused wife and victim who were manipulated by her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July of 1984, Jennifer Thompson-Cannino became a victim of breaking and entering, and sexual assault in her North Carolina apartment (Ronald Cotton). However, Thompson-Cannino wasn't an ordinary victim; she was going to find her attacker after that night, and she did everything she could try and remember him. While being assaulted, she studied his facial features, hair, tried finding any significant scars or marks that could help identify him in the future (The Perfect…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Salinas V Texas

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After a few moments of silence the officer asked a few more questions, to which the petitioner answered, and then the interview was over. After being held on unrelated charges prosecutors soon decided that they didn’t have enough evidence to prosecute and Salinas was released. A few days later a witness claimed to have heard Salinas confess to the killings. With this new evidence the prosecutors decided to try the case, but when officers went to arrest him he had absconded. In 2007, Salinas was discovered in the Houston area living under an assumed name.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to ensure a conviction against Bernardo, the prosecution arranged a plea bargain whereby Homolka would testify against her husband, in return for a lesser sentence (12 years) for her. If the prosecution had been in possession of the tapes, they would not have needed Homolka’s testimony, and she would have received a much longer prison sentence. Because the prosecution was not in possession of the tapes, the justice received by the families of the victims of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka was greatly diminished. Homolka, a murderer, received a lesser punishment in contrast to her husband, Paul Bernardo, simply due to her deal. Homolka drugged and killed her own sister, and actively participated in the sexual assaults and murders of other young women. By Homolka accepting a plea bargain, neither her own family nor the families of her victims received the justice they deserved and…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Councilman Gallagher was accused of having raped a woman whom he had a meeting with last July. One side says the sex was consensual and the other says it wasn’t and that he raped her. When the case was dismissed by the judge because of unfair and irrelevant questions, the Councilman was offered a plea bargain. Gallagher was first offered a plea bargain that would keep him out of jail but he would have to admit being guilty of committing the above accusations. He denied that offer and was made another.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of plea bargaining became a common means to resolve criminal cases in the early 1900s because not everyone that was accused of a crime had a lawyer to represent them in a trial. As the criminal justice system evolved, and there were more and more cases to prosecute, plea-bargaining was used more often so that all parties would have a faster resolution to the case, as opposed to going through a lengthy trial. The definition of plea bargaining is “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval [that] usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only some of the counts of a multicounty indictment in return for a lighter sentence than the possible for the graver charge.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, Chapter 12, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea bargaining is an essential tool used in the criminal justice system today.The process of plea bargaining usually begins before trial, and can involve a phone call between the prosecutor and the defense (Phelps & Cengage, 2006). Once the plea bargain is negotiated it would have to be approved by a judge in open court (Phelps & Cengage, 2006)With the amount of court proceedings that take place plea bargaining is a tool that can allow less cases on a judge’s…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and defendant whereby the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in return for some concession from the prosecutor. This may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to a less serious charge or to one of several charges, in return for the dismissal of other charges; or it may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to the original criminal charge in return for a more lenient sentence. A plea bargain allows both parties to avoid a lengthy criminal trial and may allow criminal defendants to avoid the risk of conviction at trial on a more serious charge. For example, in the U.S. legal system, a criminal defendant charged with a felony theft charge, the conviction of which would require imprisonment in state prison, may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to a misdemeanor theft charge, which may not carry a custodial sentence.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with you. Some crimes can be handled differently depending how the offense is classified “Many states encourage diversion programs that remove less serious criminal matters from the full” (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 4) Plea bargaining can be accepted for reasons like, defendants avoiding the time in court. Also, the prosecutor can dedicate time to other cases. A valid approach is the agreement of both part on the case “obviously both sides have to agree before one comes to pass”. (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 2) As you mention, that should not be applied in the major…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evidence in this case was weak against Ms. Jarrett, as there were no fingerprints or blood found. The only evidence was a single eyewitness testimony, which was unclear, that placed Ms. Jarrett at the scene of the crime. Ms. Jarret refused to admit guilt. To avoid trial, Ms. Jarrett was offered a plea bargain, she refused. Armed with belief in the American justice system and truth on her side, she proceeded forward.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    verdict will be handed down at that time. Based on what the crime is, what type of punishment…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics