Preview

The New Jim Crow: The Fourth Amendment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The New Jim Crow: The Fourth Amendment
Within Chapter 2 of The New Jim Crow, Michelle Alexander talks about the Fourth Amendment, which warrants against unreasonable search and seizure, which is rarely mentioned today. I then realized that the problem now is that we are not told about our civil rights and liberties, which results in our loss of agency and power. This especially happens to more disenfranchised groups such as African Americans and Latinos, in addition to other racial and ethnic groups deemed “suspicious”. To those who believe that it is fair for black people to be unfairly targeted as “criminals”, is it fair for Latinos in Arizona to be stopped and checked for a green card to make sure that they’re not “illegal”? Is it justifiable for Muslim and Arab Americans to …show more content…
Robinette case, the US Supreme Court overruled the Ohio Supreme Court. The Ohio court wanted to require police officers using traffic stops (motorists pulled over for alleged traffic violations) as an excuse for conducting drug searches, to tell the offenders explicitly that they are free to leave the scene if they so choose, before asking for permission for the search. The state court wished to impose a limitation on the disturbing and by that time common police practice; the US Supreme Court would have none of it. Such court rulings emboldened the police to push the limits of what they could do, without much fear of adverse legal consequences.
The federal oversight of the War on Drugs is provided by the Drug Enforcement Administration, which in close cooperation with countless many state and local law enforcement agencies provides training and federal guidelines (e.g. appearance and behavioral profiles of those considered to be promising suspects). At the core of the method used to interdict people involved with illegal drugs are (high) volume sweeps, typically involving traffic stops and consent searches, targeting in practice individuals who give no particular cause for suspicion, but belong to disfavored
…show more content…
SWAT teams had been (rarely) utilized from the 1960s for high-profile emergencies, such as hostage situations and hijackings, and later to combat terrorism. From the 1980s many SWAT teams were formed with federal help in localities, to be used primarily and with increasing frequency for serving drug warrants on suspected drug dealers. The SWAT raids, often ruthlessly carried out in minority communities, became very common (40,000 deployments in 2001) and resulted in many unwarranted and unjustified fatalities, trauma and other damage. The transformation from community to military policing began with the passing by the Congress in 1981 of the Military Cooperation with Law Enforcement Act; the act authorized police forces of several different types to access a variety of military facilities and resources, for the purported purpose of drug interdiction. Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton enthusiastically continued the drug policies of the Reagan administration. The size of federal disbursements to the police of a given locality was linked to the number Drug War arrests made

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robinette unsuccessfully tried to suppress marijuana and MDMA found in his vehicle. He then pleads no contest, but was found guilty. Robinette appealed that the search resulted from an unlawful detention in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This work POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment comprises solution of the following task: "What rights are protected by the 4th Amendment? Provide three concrete examples. Why are unreasonable searches forbidden? What factors determine whether a search is reasonable or not? Explain in 200…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Justice Black also believes the command that no unreasonable searches or seizures be allowed is too little to infer such a large decision. With these differences aside Justice Black feels that along with previous court decisions that the "Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches and seizures is considered together with the Fifth Amendment's ban against compelled self-incrimination, a constitutional basis emerges which not only justifies, but actually requires the exclusionary…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4th Amendment Case Study

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the two-fold requirement discussed in Katz v. United States, for analyzing when a search occurs under the 4th Amendment.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the resolution of the Civil War, rich whites in the South scrambled to regain economic control and superiority. To prevent blacks and poor whites from joining together to challenge them, a series of Jim Crow laws that segregated blacks from whites were created (Cates 50). In this time, various legal decisions played instrumental roles in the transition to a heavily segregated south. Through the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision, the government legalized segregation which led to the establishment of myriad Jim Crow laws that stripped African Americans of their Constitutional rights.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim crow laws

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    were southern blacks. Hundreds of other lynchings and acts of mob terror aimed at brutalizing…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects three distinct rights. They are liberty, property and privacy. Taking into consideration along with research and survey, I believe that each of these rights are equally important. Together they provide for a complete and well-rounded way of life. Without liberty, our lives would be limited to what the establishment would allow and therefore, what privacy could we have without the right of choice. Property would have no value without the liberty to use it as I desire.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Fourth amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, the amendment remained inactive, until the 1900’s, when several key cases were presented to the United States Supreme Court. They include, Weeks v. United States (1914), Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961), these cases were important in the influence of the Fourth Amendment. Along the same lines as cases, there were several notable people who designed the Fourth amendment, to protect our rights. The biggest and most notable figure was James Madison, who is considered the “Father of the Constitution.” The Fourth amendment is one of ten amendments that are considered our Bill of Rights.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Americans today don’t know what rights we are given. The Bill of Rights were put in place to give US citizens protection from corrupt police and government officials. A common Amendment that most Americans don’t realize we have is the Fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives us protection against arbitrary searches and seizures without a proper warrant. It was first used to prevent the use of writs of assistance which is blanket search warrants with which the british custom officials had invaded homes to search for smuggled goods. As the fourth amendment has changed and evolved in its meaning over time, many Supreme Court cases have presented themselves to the states.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “An understanding of the antecedent history of the Fourth Amendment is therefore important for an evaluation of the subsequent development of that amendment through judicial construction. History alone cannot, of course, provide the Supreme Court with clear guidance on all search and seizure questions up for decision, if only because the historical record is not always as clear as we should like it to be, and also because some issues raised under the Fourth Amendment such as the constitutionality of wiretapping or compulsory blood tests in criminal cases are of recent origin and could have been anticipated by those who drafted the Bill of Rights.” (p. 19 Landynski…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Safety is the positive to the border issue, we have too many illegal people crossing into the United States and more force needs to take place in order to change the current situation. With more border protection, the United States can control drug traffic, human…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The New Jim Crow

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Incarceration rates in the United States have exploded due to the convictions for drug offenses. Today there are half a million in prison or jail due to a drug offense, while in 1980 there were only 41,100. They have tripled since 1980. The war on drugs has contributed the most to the systematic mass incarceration of people of color, most of them African-Americans. The drug war is aimed to catch the big-time dealers, but the majority of the people arrested are not charged with serious offenses, and most of the people who are in prison today for drug arrests, have no history of violence or selling activity. The war on drugs is also aimed to catch dangerous drugs, however nearly 80 percent of the drug arrests in the 90s where for marijuana possession. The Drug War has undermined all constitutionally protected civil liberties. The court has, in recent years, permitted police to obtain search warrants based on anonymous informant 's tips. They have also allowed helicopters to surveillance homes without a warrant, and the forfeiture of cash and homes based on unproven allegations of illegal drug activity. The Supreme Court have crafted legal rules that allow law enforcement to arrest virtually anyone. In 1968, the Supreme Court modified the understanding, that if an officer believes that someone is dangerous or engaging in criminal activity, that he should conduct a limited search to find weapons that might be used against him. Police now have basically the right to stop and search just about anybody that is walking down the street for drugs, and because common sense indicates that hardly anyone nowadays will say no when police asks to search. Police officers also use pretext stops as an excuse to search for drugs. It allowed police to use minor traffic violations as a pretext for baseless drug investigations and single anyone for investigation without any evidence of illegal drug activity. The truth, however, is that…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The phrase “sex, drugs, and rock and roll” held true to its well-earned spot in 1970’s and 1980’s society. With a new, looser culture, explicit music, raunchy and rambunctious movies as well as a societal focus on many things immoral, it was an era of challenging social norms. As the use of recreational and psychoactive drugs, as well as alcohol, increased, a new problem arose; how does law enforcement and the government undo the damage being made by this new society? Laws were passed, bureaus and commissions were formed, and the President of the United States began what he called “The War on Drugs”. Over the years, some of these solutions have proven to make some impact. The initiation, tactics, and attempts at dealing a major blow to drug abuse have all affected the way America sees drugs today. A new type of warfare had made its way into the country, and after all these years, it has made its fair share of positive and negative effects.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays