Preview

The Necklace Greediness

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1059 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Necklace Greediness
Guy de Maupassant, born into nobility, wrote “The Necklace,” along with many other literary works, some inspired by his nobility. “The Necklace” is rittled with themes of wealth, and status, all issues Maupassant would have dealt with. The main character, Mathilde deals with these issues as well. When Mathilde deals with these themes her character is revealed, some good, but mostly bad. In “The Necklace” Maupassant represents Mathilde’s character by revealing her greediness, her lies, and her love. Maupassant shows greediness in a variety of ways. Mathilde thinks very highly of herself and has a vain complex. She thinks so much of herself that she feels almost every dime they have should be spent on her for just one evening. Shortly after …show more content…
This might not seem like a lie or even a big deal, but she does not belong there and she knows this. Not because people do not like her or anything such as that, but because she is not rich and does not and could not properly fit in even though she tries very hard at an event like this or with people in attendance. She also deceives everyone there by what she is wearing because she looks the part but is not. Mathilde’s biggest lie comes when she lies to her friend when she returns her necklace, but it is actually not the real necklace because she lost it on the night of the party. It was an honest mistake and would have been okay if she would have been honest with her friend, but she did not and the reader senses the fear when the story reads, “If she had detected the substitution, what would she have thought, what would she have said? Would she have taken Mme. Loisel for a thief?” (72). Lying is not good and Mathilde seems to do it frequently and quite comfortable with it. This just shows more bad qualities and an even worse character. When Maupassant writes, he more than likely writes about things he has gone through or experienced and with that knowledge the reader can infer that he probably dealt with the outsiders, the poor, and the peasants, trying to be like him. It is an easy assumption to be made and not …show more content…
He took up ruinous obligations, dealt with users and all the race lenders. He compromised all of the rest of his life, risked his signature without even knowing if he could meet it…he went to get the new necklace, putting down upon the merchant’s counter thirty-six thousand francs. (72) He risked so much showing again that love was present. Mathilde did not owe anything to anyone but a necklace to Mme. Forestier, and once a necklace is given back, she could have left but she did not. Even through all ten of those horrible years of labor, she stayed by his side. Mathilde is a greedy, liar but she also has a heart of love when it comes to her husband. Through her trying to get as much money as possible for a dress, and trying to see as many jewels as possible Maupassant shows a greedy nature about Mathilde. Through her going to the ball and as she returns the necklace, Maupassant reveals a lying habit. Through her marriage to her husband, and sticking by him through all the hard times Maupassant portrays Mathilde as loving. In the end, Mathilde looks like a terrible person who loves her husband, which is what she really

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “The Necklace,” a female character, Mathilde, is living in Paris during the 19th century. She is poor, yet undyingly wishes she was wealthy. One day the woman is invited to a prestigious ball within her city. She immediately she contacts a rich friend and borrows a fabulous necklace. Once the night is all said and done and she returns from the ball, she realizes that the borrowed necklace is lost. She reacts by lying about the necklace and buying her friend a new one. With her financial situation the way it is she goes spiraling into debt and never recovers. Later, once Mathilde admits to her friend that she lost and replaced the necklace, it is revealed that the borrowed necklace was a fake worth very little.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathilde vs. Dee

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, money was a symbol of power and wealth, for the amount of money a person has defines their social status. In “The Necklace”, the setting plays an intricate role in the decisions that Mathilde makes, and the consequences that come along with her actions. In “The Necklace”, Guy de Maupassant uses the setting to further display and develop Mathilde’s greed.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In these plays, they both found happiness in money. In the Necklace, Mathilde “had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but appearance of its possession, led Mathilde to borrow an expensive necklace from a wealthy friend to show it off at the ball she was invited to by the Minister of Public Instruction. She ended up losing the necklace and worked half of her life to get it back. Not knowing that the necklace was fake. She didn’t want anyone to know that she had lost it, and would do anything to earn money.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “The Necklace,” is a story in which Mathilde is the main character. She is a character with a difficult personality because of her necessity to please others, the way she cares about what the others say, the way she is selfish, and only thinks and cares about herself, and her being in padron. In the story her personality, and attitudes did not changed very much, it was only strengthened. An analysis of Mathilde’s actions, and attitudes show that she did not change from the beginning to the end of “The Necklace,”.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine how she felt when she received the information that it was not even worth half as much as the necklace she replaced. Through all that time laboring to pay off the borrowed necklace, Mathilde has lost her natural beauty. As said on page 168, “She became heavy, rough, harsh, like one of the poor. her hair untended, her skirts askew, her hands red, her voice shrill, she even slopped water on her floors and scrubbed them herself.” Her friend Mme.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Irony In The Necklace

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    With the aid of dramatic irony, Mme. Loisel’s deceitfulness is proven further in the story. As Mathilde requests four hundred francs from her husband, she is merely “...going over her allowance and thinking also of the amount she could ask…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my belief, Mathilde Loisel is a static character. She has not really changed since the beginning of the story. In the beginning of the short story “The Necklace” written by Guy de Maupassant, Mathilde is a very stubborn, selfish, and dissatisfied person. This is shown in the story by how she takes the money that her husband has saved for a riffle, to buy a dress she will only wear once to the ball. It is also shown when her husband tells her that they have been invited to a ball, Mathilde simply throws a fit because she has nothing to wear and will look poor when she arrives. One other time that her personality is shown is when Mathilde and her husband are ready to leave, her husband puts a shawl on her to keep her warm but it is old and ragged so she refuses to put it on. Towards the end of the book, Mathilde does stay the same she had before personality wise. This is shown in the story when Mathilde bumps into Madame Forister, 10 years later and rants to her that it has been Madame Forister’s fault that all these years she has had to work to pay off for the necklace that Mathilde lost, when it is no fault but her own. Mathilde also shows that she has had a very tough ten years working to pay off the necklace and is very glad they are over because she has had to bring herself even further down the social ladder because they had to work so much and were basically poor. Throughout the story Mathilde Loisel has had the same personality, always being greedy, dramatic, and envious. Mathilde has definitely learned her lesson, but will always be the same person she was before.…

    • 301 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grief In The Necklace

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the story, Mathilde is constantly thinking about how she compares to others, and the living conditions she is stuck with. She thinks as if the glass is always half empty. Because she is constantly comparing, she always wants, and dreams of more. When she is invited to the ball she is grief stricken and embarrassed because she has nothing to wear. “But with a violent effort she overcame her grief and replied with a calm voice, wiping her wet cheeks: Nothing. Only I haven't a dress and so I can’t go to this party.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mathilde is envious of the social class and wealth of others because she has no family name, no inheritance nor background. She is especially envious of women who are better off than herself. Mathilde may have vicariously experienced wealth through Madam Forestier, who is one of her good friends from they were children. Mathilde has a lot of grief towards seeing other women who could have very well been her, enjoy the benefits that comes along with having a lot of money. This led her to fantasize and long for more than what she had. Her envious ways and greed led her to make decisions that she will end up paying for greatly.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “The Necklace,” GUY DE MAUPASSANT character loisel Mathilde who is a very greedy and selfish woman, believes that she was born for every delicacy and luxury there is and feels that she was made for all beautiful jewels and clothes, which cause her emotional…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis for "The Necklace"

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The meaning of Moupassant’s “The Necklace” is that one should not fall into the trap of wishing for better things and not recognizing what one has to be thankful for. Moupassant uses the main character, Mme. Loisel, to illustrate this point as she struggles with her self-image and her desire to always be better in the eyes of others, especially the upper class and the rich.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the party, Madame Loisel loses the necklace, resulting in tireless work, loans, and night jobs for her and her husband in order to pay back the equivalent of the price. The couple finally succeeds when all the money is paid ten years later, only for Mathilde to discover that the necklace was ironically a fake, and worth a very small percentage of what the couple paid. The theme of this story is that an overemphasis on material wealth can shrink the spirit and leave one open to the changeability of fortune. The situational irony highlights this moral because the Loisels would never have had to exhaust themselves if Madame Loisel wasn’t so obsessed with riches and wealth. From the very beginning of the story, she wastes her time dreaming of luxuries such as fine silks, beautiful furniture, and gourmet feasts. Even when she is at Madam Forestier’s house to try on necklaces to borrow, she is never satisfied until she has seen the very best. Madame Loisel’s preoccupation with appearance clouds her judgment as well. As soon as she realizes that she has lost the necklace, she should simply come clean to Madam Forestier. Instead, she is too concerned with how her reputation will be affected, so she keeps quiet. She later pays the price for this when she discovers that the necklace is “false [and]…worth five hundred francs at most.” The life that she gets instead as punishment during the ten years in debt is even more difficult and meager than her life to begin with, which stresses how fame and fortune is so fleeting and unimportant in the scheme of…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power of Possessions

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The author uses conceit throughout his short story to display the theme of materialism. Maupassant shows the main character as having excessive self-pride that makes her unhappy. Mathilde’s husband tries to please her by inviting her to a high-status ball and, “instead of being delighted… she threw down the invitation on the table with disdain… ‘what do you want me to do with that?’ ” (265). Mathilde shows that she is prideful and has a high opinion of the wealthy people who will attend the ball and she knows that she would not be able to go without feeling like she is inferior because she is poor. She is not happy with her husband’s invitation because she does not want other people to see her as without material possessions. Mathilde is prideful because she cares what her peers think of her. She is concerned with her status and how people perceive her. Her pride is shown when she says, “I have no dress and therefore I can’t go to this ball. Give your card to some colleague whose wife is better equipped that I” (266). Mathilde holds on to her pride when she says that she cannot go to the…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, she is not a sympathetic character because she disrespects her loving husband. In spite of having a kind, generous, loyal and hard working husband she never stops complaining about him. Mr. Loisel works hard in the evening and sometimes at night as well in order make their life easier. Yet, Mathilde is self-centered and never realizes the problems her husband has to go through to ensure her happiness. Mr. Loisel expects his wife to be thrilled when he gives her invitation to the Ministry’s party. Instead, she throws the invitation in his face for not having a suitable dress and jewelry for the function. He buys her a dress with the money he has saved for a gun. Also after the party, he goes to look for the lost necklace at four in the morning and spends his ten years to pay the debt incurred by a lost necklace. He does everything possible to fulfill her demands and to make her happy. But she didn’t feel his love and devotion for her. Also, in the other way she is too proud because she doesn’t tell Madame Forestier about the lost necklace at first. Because of Mathilde’s greed and pride she and her husband have to spend a miserable life. Therefore, the reader should not feel any pity for…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays