Preview

The Nature of Evil

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1897 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Nature of Evil
The nature of evil is a crucial yet difficult to understand concept. The conundrum of how good people can turn bad is one of the most prominent questions in today’s society. However, the word good is to be used lightly as following John Locke’s theory of Tabula Rasa; people aren’t born inherently good or evil thus their morality comes from experience and perception. The privileged like to think that they are all good people and there is a distinct line that separates them from everyone else. However it is not nearly so black and white. Almost everyone is neither wholly good nor evil but rather a product of their circumstance. Who is to say a privileged, successful student wouldn’t flourish in a life of crime they been born into it? I will attempt to explore how good people can “cross over” and do evil things. To describe this conundrum, physiologist Philip Zimbardo uses the term “the Lucifer effect”. I think that three core root things that cause “good” people to commit evil are blind obedience to authority, the bystander effect and desire for power.

Blind obedience to authority is a catalyst that can cause ordinary people to commit evil. A researcher named Stanley Milgrim asked the question “could the holocaust happen in America?” He wanted to know if regular good people would electrocute an innocent purely because they were told to. People thought, no way not me I’m a good person. So to test this Milgrim conducted a series of experiments which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. The experiment involved the subjects assigned as “teachers” being told to give “learners” increasingly powerful electrical shocks as they answered questions incorrectly. The experiment was supervised by an authoritative experimenter. Unbeknown to the teachers it was a set-up, the learners were hired actors and weren’t actually receiving any electrical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key study that has looked into research is one carried out by Milgrams in 1963. The aim of the experiment was investigate whether ordinary people will obey a legitimate authority figure even when required to injure an innocent person. Milgrams recruited 40 male participants by advertising for volunteers to take part in his study. Each participant would be paid $4.50. The experiment consisted of one ‘real’ participant and two confederates – the experimenter, who would be the authority figure, and the learner. The ‘real’ participant was asked to administer increasingly strong electric shocks to the learner each time he got a question wrong. The learner was sat in another room and gave all the wrong answer in silence until he reached 300V, he then began to pound on the walls and then gave no response to the next question. If the participant asked to stop, the experimenter would say “it's absolutely necessary that you continue” or “you have no other choice, you must go on”. Milgrams found that 65% of the participants continued to 450V, the maximum voltage. All the participants went to 300V and only 12.5% of them stopped at that point. Milgrams concluded that ordinary people are obedient to authority figures even when asked to behave in an inhuman way.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Possibility of Evil

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In “The Possibility of Evil” The main character Mrs. Strangeworth shows one personality and keeps the other private. The one she shows gets others people impression as a kind and respected old lady. Mrs. Strangeworth’s private personality was very rude and disrespectful. The author uses characterization to show two sides of Mrs. Strangeworth’s personality.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People sometimes act in ways they know to be wrong or unethical because they see people of a higher authority do it. For example, In Milgram’s obedience experiment, test subjects who were referred to as the “teacher,” were told to give an electric shock to a complete stranger who was referred to as the “student,” if they got an answer wrong on a test. The test subject was told the shock would get increasingly more dangerous each time the student got the answer wrong. When the teacher wanted to stop, a person in a white labcoat would tell them to “Please keep going”, or “Please proceed with the test.” 65% of the teachers kept shocking the students until the last shock setting was reached and it measured beyond lethal. People would shock a complete stranger to death just because an authoritative figure told them to keep going. These people had every chance to stop shocking the person but they kept doing it because a person in a white labcoat told them to. Students in school obey their…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roots Of Evil

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If people are born good what makes them become evil? Evil is grown in people's hearts over time and the more someone gives into temptation, the more evil their heart becomes. People are inherently good, however, some people succumb to evil because of the lack of self-restraint against temptation.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People tend to believe that there is a clear line between good and evil – with them on one side, others always evil. Philip Zimbardo reveals that this line is far more permeable. Good can turn bad, and ‘evil’ people capable of redemption. He describes evil as “exercising power to intentionally harm people (psychologically), to hurt people (physically), to destroy people (mortally), or ideas, and to commit crimes against humanity”. The question offered is, what is it that makes people turn evil? It will be shown that the power to turn people evil lies in the system – the legal, political, economical, and cultural background that creates the situation that corrupts individuals.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good vs. Evil

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many concepts that are determined in the eye of the beholder. People have different morals; someone’s morals could be seen as corruption to someone else. What someone considers beautiful, another might consider appalling. A person’s definition of justice could be someone else’s definition of illegal. There are many factors as to why we all have different paradigms, such as the way we were raised, our past experiences, our culture, or our faith. Consequently, we all judge accordingly to our own perspectives. In East of Eden, John Steinbeck states that one can be assumed good or evil once the person has died. With our different paradigms, we would have different perspectives on good and evil. Therefore, we do not know the correct definition of good or evil, so it would not be right for us to judge someone at all before or after their death.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is evil ?

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is evil? John Hick defined evil as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness”. The monotheistic God of Christianity supposedly possesses divine qualities of omnipotence, omniscience and Omni benevolence. Omnipotence means the almighty and all knowing, omniscience means having infinite knowledge and Omni benevolent means all loving. If God is all of these things then why is there evil? The problem of evil brings up some big issues and raises some concerns. The existence of evil and suffering in the world challenges this idea of God being these three things. Augustine, in ‘Confessions,’ states the problem very clearly: “Either God is not able to abolish evil or not willing; if he is not able then he is not all-powerful; if he is not willing then he is not all-good.” This is saying that God has the choice to prevent evil or not but he is either notable because of humankind or not willing as a punishment. Augustine’s theodicy tries to explain and solve the problem of evil. Augustine’s theodicy is based on the book of Genesis (1-3) in the bible. In other words, the creation story. Augustine’s theodicy argues that God created the world and it was perfect, without any evil or suffering. Genesis 1:31: “God saw all he had made and saw that it was very good” This means that God did not intend to create evil with his perfect world. So therefore from that we can conclude evil must have been bought into the world some other way. In Augustine’s theodicy he describes evil has an error of mankind and that mankind bought evil into the world them and therefore not an error of God’s wrong doing. Augustine defined evil as the privation of goodness, just as blindness is a privation of sight. Since evil is not an entity in itself, just like blindness is not an entity in itself, God could not have created it. Privation simply means the lack of good or something that is in absence of human warmth. Instead, evil…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evil and Suffering

    • 6401 Words
    • 26 Pages

    “If Only there is No God then there is No Problem:” A Theological Reflection On the Mystery of Evil And Uniqueness of God…

    • 6401 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological studies have shown that under the guise of following authority, blind compliance leads to irrational actions; the participants in this study were told to administer increasingly painful shocks to a subject if he or she answered a question wrong, even when the participants could witness the subject’s pain, up to the brink of “death” (the subjects were not actually being hurt). This reflects the mindless compliance that led to genocides and the Holocaust--destroying thousands of lives, cultures, and societies, as well as displacing and destroying families for…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I do not believe that the term “evil” is a word that can be used as a characteristic. I believe that “evil” is merely the label that society places upon those who are different in a specific way. It is only in our evolved “moral” society, that people are placed in groups depending on their so called traits, e.g. evil/good. In my opinion, everyone is a blank sheet. It is not their speeches, it is not their actions and it is not their personalities that colours them. It is what society labels them as. Anyone who is different gets a label. A great example is the people of various Islamic terrorist organisations. In our western society they are evil, but in their origin countries, they are saviours, trying to rid the world of non-believers. It is merely a question of perspective. Another example is the Roman invasion of France and Germany around 5 B.C. If we ask the French or the Germans of that time, they would see the romans as tyrants, but if we ask the romans, they would see themselves as great heroes, bent on expanding the great empire of Rome.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Psychology of Evil

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this video Dr. Philip Zombardo discusses the psychology of evil. He explains that there are many different definitions of evil. He believes evil is the exercise of power to intentionally harm psychologically, hurt physically or destroy mortally. Some questions he covers are, what makes people go wrong? Are people born evil or grow evil over time? He goes over the many experiments he has done and examples to test and prove his theory.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Problem Of Evil

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page

    To me, evil is intentionally hurting someone else physically or emotionally and gaining pleasure by it. I definitely believe that there is some kind of evil in the world. If there wasn’t we wouldn’t be dealing with the problems we have today. I believe that there is evil in the world because of all of the daily events that happen like mass shootings, terrorism, serial killers, war, clinical depression, diseases, disorders and much more. The world would be completely different if these factors did not exist. I believe that people are born evil and they can also develop it too but influences around them. There are some hereditary problems that may make people look evil but they really can't help it. In our world we tend to ignore evil and because more and more things are happening and we just become accustomed to it. It's just the norm now. I don't think there's a proper response to evil and we can't necessarily confront it because we never know what the outcome will be. Evil people are in the world because they don't like themselves and they have no empathy. A person can have a malfunction in the brain to cause them to be evil, there are a lot different kinds. Then there are narcissists that purposely make lies of other people to make themselves look great and to dehumanize the other person. They make everyone become against one specific person and talk bad about them in every way possible. That can permanently destroy someone's self esteem and trust for other people. In my opinion this is a form of evil. Evil is something we have to deal with whether it personal or not. The media shows examples of evil everyday. I wish it didn't exist because the world would be a much happier place but unfortunately that's not the case. Life has its ups and downs, good and bad sides to it and we all have to get through it.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man Is Evil by Nature

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Human nature cannot turn back. Once man has left the time of innocence and equality, he can never return to it.” (Rousseau as quoted in Franklin) But was humanity ever innocent? Stories were told of the barbaric deeds of humanity-how Asian philosophy talks of Yin and Yang and how it is used to describe how good and evil are connected and in every good person there is a spot of bad.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays