Preview

The Most Dangerous Game

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Most Dangerous Game
s. Wozniak 11/5/12 ELA9H

One critic remarked that “Ironically, Zaroff’s belief in his invincibility as a hunter, weakens him and causes his defeat.” After reading “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, I think thins comment is right on target and I agree with him one hundred percent. In the end, Zaroff’s attitude about his hunting skills is what caused him to loose the most dangerous game. Zaroff’s lose was due to the fact that he thought he was the best and there was no one out there that could beat him. For example Zaroff, in the beginning of the book, tells Rainsford how he has never failed in the ‘game’ and how he always wins. In my opinion, at this point Zaroff was too cocky and there was no way that Rainsford was going to let him win. When it comes to confidence you can’t have to much of it because if you start to get to confident, you give other people a reason they want to beat you even more than they did before they knew you were cocky. I think that is just what Rainsford did in “The Most Dangerous Game.” I think he not only wanted to beat Zaroff just to survive, but I also think he wanted to show him that he isn’t the only great hunter on this island. As you can see there are many supporting reasons why I agree with the comment “Ironically, Zaroff’s belief in his invincibility as a hunter, weakens him and causes his defeat.” Being confident is a good thing but if you become too confident, it will lead to a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In "Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Cornell, Zaroff reveals strength, ingenuity, and a selfishness through his murderous and questionable methods of hunting.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainty vs Doubt

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Phelps expresses to us in his statement that certainty is all you need to achieve whatever it is that you are wanting. Though there are times when certainty does help us to achieve, there are other times when it blinds us from what is truly going on around us. Certainty is necessary when you need the confidence going into something, like a speech for instance. If you lack confidence you won’t know what you are going to say and that won’t help you to get to the point you are trying to speak about, but if you had that certainty then there wouldn’t be a problem with achieving what you want to say. The downfall to certainty is clearly shown in The Crucible. In this play, Danforth, a judge, is so cetain that witchery is among his town that he wont stop at anything to get rid of it and he truly doesn’t. He takes the lives of many innocent people of the town just because of accusations of others and his certainty that they are true, but if he would have relooked at his actions to the innocent people he knew well before the accusations then his certainty wouldn’t have played such a damaging role.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Rainsford first gets to Zaroff’s mansion and Ivan points the gun at Rainsford, when Zaroff hunts Rainsford, and for all the other men that Zaroff had hunted on his island. The significance of conflict is that Rainsford has no other choice, other than being whipped by the brutal force of Ivan, than to be hunted by the sick minded General Zaroff. Whose love for hunting is so extreme he hunts men. Another element I will add to Cornell’s work is key, suspense. Suspense grabs viewer’s attention, and at times makes the audience predictable, tense, and even excited. Suspense will be added to “The Most Dangerous Game” starting when Rainsford goes to Zaroff’s mansion. In the story Rainsford refuses to go into Zaroff’s library, but in the motion picture he will. This scene will be terrifying and full of suspense as Rainsford is lured in and is forced to see all the severed human heads that were once Zaroff’s hunt. This key element will also happen when Rainsford is sent out to hide from Zaroff. Towards the end of the hunt, when Rainsford last trap gets set off and…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the story, Rainsford shows he is very capable. For example, Rainsford meets face to face with General Zaroff for the first time, and Rainsford shows that he is very capable within the game of hunting when Rainsford is forced to survive. As Zaroff says "I have played the fox, now I must play the cat of the fable."(Connell 31) In the quote, Rainsford has presented he has been the one trying to survive with all his strength and he now can finally revolt against General Zaroff the man who is trying to catch Rainsford and win the game. For instance, Rainsford was forced to swim from falling off of his yacht into the ocean all the way to the Island, showing extreme capability.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, Rainsford, the main character, goes through hard times because he is forced to transition from a hunter to a huntee, then back to a hunter. As he uses his many strengths and his knowledge from both perspectives, he creates a plan and ends up beating the whole game despite all of his conflicts. In all likelihood, this wouldn't happen in real life, but we can still learn from him. Throughout the story, the reader witnesses how Rainsford's character struggles with different conflicts with his enemy,…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this case, Rainsford had a more cunning and direct approach to his problem, even though he was mostly nervous and somewhat fearful. As Rainsford hid from Zaroff as best as he can, he also laid traps down for the Cossack. Even though most of his traps did not manage to get Zaroff, Rainsford did not give up and flee. Eckels was calm at the start of the quest, but became increasingly nervous as he thought about the dangers that were to come. He let his nervous personality take over, and when it was too much, he decided to give up. Eckels also let his selfishness get to him, which made his hunting companions deal with the Tyrannosaurus Rex while Eckels went back to the time machine. While both hunters were indeed frightened and nervous, the main difference was Rainsford’s ability to suppress his fear and let his instinct guide him, which he demonstrated by telling himself, “I must keep my nerve. I must keep my nerve,” (165). That showed that Rainsford had an actual way of telling himself to control his personality and his emotions at a critical moment. Eckels tried suppressing the same fears to a certain extent, but gave up and fled from the problem. All these mixed emotions and traits ultimately determine how well their quest goes and where they will end…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an action movie, producers and directors add certain music to certain scenes to make them more suspenseful, sad, etc. Many authors add details to a story about the setting to accomplish the same goal. In the story, Most Dangerous Game, the author adds many details about the dark night, General Zaroff’s mansion, and the jungle to add more suspense, or terror, to the story.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell shows that Rainsford is regretful, anxious, and fearful. First, it is shown that Rainsford is regretful due to the fact that General Zaroff gives him the option to play the most dangerous game or be whipped by Ivan, to which Rainsford chooses to play the game. Rainsford tries again and again to fall asleep at night, but he is helpless with his choice replaying in his mind. “Rainsford could not quiet his brain with the opiate of sleep.” Second, Rainsford’s anxiousness is shown because he is uneasy about the thought of not being able to see the day after next. Although he is a marvelous hunter, there is a possibility that he may be no match to someone who is undefeated in assassinating humans.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dangerous Game

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The smile and the action of turning back caused Rainsford to believe that Zaroff knew where he was hiding. Also the action of letting the smoke to hit Rainsford nose, and looking up the tree but stopping right below where Rainsford is, suggests that Zaroff is playing with Rainsford. I agree with Rainsford because in the story it is said “ ...its pungent incense-like smoke floated up to Rainsford’s nostrils. Rainsford held his breath. The general’s eyes had left the ground and were traveling inch by inch up the tree..... But the sharp eyes of the hunter stopped before they reached the limb where Rainsford lay; a smile spread over his brown face.” This phrase gives a hint that Zaroff has sensed Rainsford’s existence.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Zaroff Morals

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    In this story, General Zaroff doesn't realize that what he is doing is wrong. What he is doing is killing people, and he seems to think it is the same as hunting normal animals. He got “bored” of normal animals, because they couldn't reason with him. Humans give him a more exciting hunting experience, according to him. Zaroff doesn’t understand that it is wrong to kill humans, and he shows this misunderstanding when he says “There is one [animal] that can [reason]” and Rainsford says back “But you can’t mean… I can’t believe you are serious”, To this Zaroff replies: “Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting... I had to invent a new animal to hunt...I found one... it supplies me with the most exciting hunting... the value of human…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the story's protagonist Sanger Rainsford is hunted throughout the jungle of an uninhabited island, by General Zaroff a man who is fixated on hunting humans for sport. In the short story “Lady or the Tiger?” by Frank Stockton, an imperious, semi-barbaric king rules over his kingdom with an iron fist, when his daughter falls in love with a young man he uses this opportunity to put the man in a public arena, where his is given the option of marriage or death. Both authors create villainous characters…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once Zaroff revealed what his “most dangerous game” was, he attempted to justify his murderous hobby by arguing that, “‘I am strong...If I wish to hunt why should I not,’”(10). Here, Zaroff is committing a standard mistake; he does something because he can, but morally should not. The only way he actually justifies his “game” is by saying that it is diverting and provides a challenge for him. The belief that he is all-powerful blinds him from the fact that since he has frequently perpetrated against innocent humans, he will have to pay for his actions. Furthermore, Zaroff concluded that Rainsford had perished, but he is later proven wrong. As an illustration, “A man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there… ‘I congratulate you’... ‘You have won the game,’”(18). Connell uses this event to affirm that Zaroff had indeed been hunted all along. Although he did not realize it, Zaroff was gradually falling prey to Rainsford. The American was constantly outsmarting him and made numerous attempts on his life. Throughout the story Rainsford was gaining leverage; it is clear he won because Zaroff was cocky and ignorant of his surroundings. In Zaroff’s case, the very thing that made him powerful debilitated…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard Connell, the author of, "The Most Dangerous Game," depicts the theme, the most dangerous things are often well hidden; you never fully know how dangerous something is until it is right in your face and the hints are all out. Mr. Zaroff is the perfect example of how the most dangerous things are well hidden; in the article he says, "' I had to invent a new animal to hunt.'...'...It must have courage, cunning, and above all it must be able to reason.'" this shows that the most dangerous things are often well hidden because the animal he is talking about is humans; we are the the smartest species in the world. General Zaroff is hinting at the fact that he is hunting humans, Mr. Rainsford is not quite picking up on the hint…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainty & Doubt

    • 542 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An example of when certainty led to failure was when General Robert E. Lee lost the Battle of Gettysburg in the Civil War. His original plan of taking the war North and exposing the true social fabric of the South in the Union led to his ultimate defeat. Lee’s certainty originally came from prior victories and a fortunate escape at Sharpsburg. However, his experience had not taught him that all good things come to an end. And by that, Lee’s assumption that continuing his streak lead to his loss and the end of the Civil War. By Lee’s failure to succeed through certainty, his personal perspective adapted while his experience continued to grow as the past mistakes would be accounted for while future ones would be expected.…

    • 542 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics