Preview

The Meaning of "Evil Behind Animals Rights"

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Meaning of "Evil Behind Animals Rights"
Wyman 1
Misty Dawn Wyman
English 1213-W03
Professor Melanie Tucker
January 31st, 2012
The Meaning of The Evil Behind Animal Rights The text called, 'The Evil of Animal “Rights”', written by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, explains why animal testing is important and what animal activist groups have done to keep the testing from occurring. They explain the necessity of animal testing for man kind. The cures of different diseases and cancers, could all be created with the testing on animals-mostly rats and mice. The companies and labs doing these tests, like Huntingdon, which is mentioned in the text, are being harassed and interrupted in their process by animal activist groups, fighting for animal “rights”. According to the authors of this text, well being of man kind lay upon these scientists performing these tests on the animals. Animal testing is an important factor for society. There are many people and groups out there that do not agree with that statement. Scientists use special techniques that involve growing actual skin in labs, which helps burn victims and those with severe skin issues. A common solution to a heart valve replacement comes from a pig. Doctors will use a valve from a pig's heart and place it in a humans heart, in turn saving that persons' life. Scientists have also grown an actual human ear off of the back of a hairless mouse. Once the ear was surgically removed, the mouse remained healthy and lived out it's life (The Bionic Body). The purpose of this text is to give a little insight as to why animal testing is important and what the companies doing this testing go through with animal activist groups. With the animal testing, possible cure for AIDS, other deadly diseases, and maybe cancer lie upon these creatures. The authors try to explain that the animal activist groups are trying their best to keep this from happening.
Wyman 2
Companies like Huntingdon test new products on animals like mice and rats before they deemed safe and



Cited: Animal Rights Uncompromised: 'Pets ' http://www.peta.org/about/why-peta/pets.aspx,, James, Missy and Merickel, Alan P. Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, The Evil of Animal “Rights”, Reading Literature and Writing Argument, Fourth Edition by, pg. 604-605. The Bionic Body http://www.pbs.org/saf/1107/features/body.htm Why is PETA Killing Thousands of Rescued Pets? http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/peter-worthington/peta-kills-animals_b_1296370.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author argues inherent value. Regan points out animals should be able to experience life with inherent value of their own. Addressing commercial animal agriculture, the author declares "The fundamental moral wrong here is not that animals are kept in stressful close confinement or in isolation, or that their pain and suffering, their needs and preferences are ignored or discounted." Regan continues the only way to right the wrong would be to stop…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Millions of animals , millions of needles, and millions of failed tests . For years animal testing has been a brimming controversy for many . Some people believe that there is no harm in animal testing while others seeme to think that it is corrupt. Animal testing is in fact opprobrious and an immense threat to animals . According to Philosopher Jeremy Bentham the questions is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk . But, can they suffer ? ( qtd in Isacat 187)…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal testing has been going on for a couple of years now. Scientists use animal testing as a form of “safe” testing. According to Humane Society International, animal testing is, “Procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into the basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. (1)” Many companies use animal testing because it is easier, or more ethical, to…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Of Animal Testing

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals have been used in research for countless numbers of years, dating back all the way to BCE. The number of animals in testing has grown as the years have passed, and their purpose has resulted in treatments for lung cancer, childhood leukemia, breast cancer, and many others. When most people think about animal science, they think about the cruelty and immoral treatment of animals; they do not bother to think about the side effects of animal testing. The medicine we buy or are prescribed, the lotions we use, and everyday makeup we wear would not be available without the use of animals in labs. With all the benefits that come with animal testing, one might ask why anyone would be opposed to animal testing. However, an article entitled “Ethics…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the animal rights activists and researchers over the issue of, whether animals should be allowed to be studied in research labs, or not, is constantly debated. The heavily accepted plea of the animal rights activists to remove animals from testing is a completely preposterous goal, and when looked further in to, have extreme flaws and negative adverse effects on scientific progress and the world. Because of this, scientific research on animals should continue until other sustainable means are developed and the negative effects of the current “solutions” are resolved.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of animal cruelty, there are plenty of controversial issues surrounding this topic. Out of all of them, animal testing would be the most controversial topic in dealing with animal cruelty. Scientists have been doing animal testing for many years, using animals as their guinea pigs. There is a controversy on whether animal testing is right or wrong. On one side, the article “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans” by Frankie Trull talks about, as said in the title, how animal testing is helpful in finding cures for human diseases and that we should continue in doing so. The article states “This extraordinary development wouldn’t have been possible without animal research” (Trull 2). This shows how animal testing has helped out in finding cures for many illnesses in humans. Without the help of animals, we wouldn’t have the cures we have today. On the other hand, some people believe that animal testing is wrong and shouldn’t be done. According to the article “Killing Animals and Humans,” it states “...many differences – both obvious and very subtle – between humans and other species make animal experiments a waste of time, effort, money and lives – both human and animal.” (Animal Aid 6). Why test on animals…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the FDA encourages manufacturers to conduct whatever testing is necessary to ensure the safety of their products, it does not specifically require the use of animals. (FDA) The FDA actually encourages companies to consider alternatives before deciding that testing on animals is necessary. They advocate that research and testing for products use a maximum amount of useful scientific information and a minimal number of animals tested. When testing does occur, they advocate for the most humane methods available. The Food and Drug Administration supports the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy of Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. If companies are not required by the FDA to test their products on animals, there is no reason that it should be a method that is resorted to for experimentation.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The US National Institute of Health spends $14 billion out of their $31 billion annual budget on animal researching(Humane Society International; Conlee; US National Institutes of Health). Animal testing has become a very controversial topic to discuss. Experimenting on animals is cruel because even though there are alternative ways to test people still believe that testing on the animals is a better way to do things. Acts of cruelty against the animals, and the fact that animals are different from humans seem to be big issues in the controversy. There are alternative ways to test for products other than testing the animals. There have been horrible acts of animal cruelty that violates the Animal Welfare Act’s laws, and the last…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing Final Draft

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Annually, more than 100.000 animals are used for test product’s security included household cleaners, cosmetics and pharmaceutical products (PETA Fact Sheet). For many years, the application of animals has been considered to be a normal strategy in three primary fields: biomedical research, education and product safety evaluation. In 2009, it was estimated that approximately, 3.6 million animals were used for testing and were killed after experiments; about 2.7 million of them were not administered with anesthesia. Animal welfare groups are pressuring world governments to take steps to reduce their reliance on animal experiments and to inflict strict regulations on animal testing (Government-Required Animal Testing: Overview).…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    100 million animals are used in animal testing every single year to further the understanding of species and the impact of different modern medicines. There are many organizations that are extremely against the use of these animals in medicine, saying that it is “cruel and inhumane”. Compare these 100 million to the 56 billion animals slaughtered for food for humans. Those 100 million almost seem like a small amount, don’t they? The animals used in scientific testing have contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. In “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans”, published in The Wall Street Journal, author and opinion journalist, Frankie L. Trull, analyzes the medical miracles and breakthroughs due to animal testing, including the treatments…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics:Animal Testing

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The 21st century world has greatly advanced in all realms thanks to immense research that has produced inventions and innovations that have made planet earth a better habitable place. However, in the realm of biological research, an ethical public discourse has ensued over the use of animal testing by pharmaceutical companies, universities, farms, medical schools, defense departments, and commercial establishments among other institutions (Jones, 2013). In this case, animal testing refers to the utilization of invertebrates and non-human vertebrates as test objects for products destined for human use. For example, animal testing can be used to evaluate safety and potency of medical treatments and toxicity of products among other uses (Jones, 2013). Although there seems to be divergent views held by animal activists on one side and scientific realm on the other, there is a need to find a solution to the problem. This paper aims to critically evaluate the ethical debate on animal testing highlighting the possible solution to this debacle.…

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every life created by god is equal, And a huge amount of people Have been no animal testing users. They strongly propose that animals shall not be used in scientific researches, Experiment animals are protective walls of human’s health. They are routinely cut open, poisoned and then caged in for weeks, months and sometimes even years! Some animals are often given diseases to see weather a new drug will work or it has side effects.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, people might think it's better to test on animals first for humans’ safety, but why test a product that is meant for humans on an animal? The results will most likely not be the same as a human’s and could make it more dangerous for them. For example, smoking was thought to be harmless because animals didn't have a negative effect to it yet thousands of people continue to smoke and die because it caused cancer.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays