Preview

Reasons for Successful D-Day Landings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1025 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reasons for Successful D-Day Landings
“The main reason for the success of the D-Day landings was the careful planning of the Allies.”

How far do sources A-F support this statement? (16)

There are a number of reasons for why the D-Day landings were successful, one of which was the extensive preparation and planning of the Allies – for many months before the operation itself. Sources A-F support this hypothesis in varied amounts.

Firstly source A overall doesn’t support the hypothesis as it shows how the Germans were unprepared for any landings at all, and doesn’t directly mention the planning that we know from background knowledge, influenced the complacency of the German generals. The source states, “ The German Air Force reported no sudden concentration of shipping in the ports o Dover, Folkestone and along the Thames.” This statement shows that the Germans didn’t know where to look for Allied forces and didn’t expect attacks until later. This is reinforced further as: “ (Rommel) chose now to go and see Hitler. His wife’s birthday was on 6 June, so he could combine business with pleasure.” This complacency suggests that the Germans were not prepared for attacks at that moment. However A does slightly support the statement, as it shows that the planning, which had gone into deceiving the German forces, had succeeded.

Source B supports the hypothesis to an extent, stating: “ they are not going to come yet, and when they do it’ll be at Calais.” This statement shows that the deception planned by the Allies has worked as the Germans expected the Armies to land at Calais, on a different day than was actually planned. However, the General talking in B also says: “If I know the British, they’ll go to church next Sunday one last time and then sail on Monday.” This suggests more complacency on the part of the German generals, and downplays the importance of the Allied planning, meaning that Source B actually slightly disagrees with the hypothesis.

Source C disagrees to an extent with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    General Dwight D. Eisenhower, supreme commander for the Allied forces during World War II, had to make the decision to attack Normandy beaches along side the British. This battle on Normandy is well know by the name D-Day. Eisenhower had to decide whether it was better to postpone until the end of June or go along with the unpredictable weather. The primary component for the attack on Normandy was the unpredictable weather. Another was the choice to leave the boats in position or to bring the ships back to refuel. These decisions were a great concern, because without the ships you cannot have soldiers and without good weather you can’t see the beaches. Leaving these two the most primary components to the attack on Normandy.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To complete necessary objectives a full moon was required for light so their bombers could bomb early in the morning and for the spring tide to allow easier landing on the beach (2007). Needing a full moon the invasion could only happen a few times a month (2007). D-day was originally scheduled to begin on June 5th though bad weather made Eisenhower postponed the invasion. If the weather did not improve the Allies would have to return to base and try again next month. Eisenhower had a meeting with his lead meteorologist that informed him that weather should be calm enough for a June 6th invasion 2007). The Germans thought that since there was bad weather it would postpone an invasion for a few days. General Dollman lowered the alert status of all of his troops that were protecting the coasts (Zaloga…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dunkirk is a city in north France. On May 10th Field marshal Grdvon Rudsted directed 101,500,000 men and 1,500 tanks, two thirds of Germany's forces and in the west, and nearly three quarters of it's tanks, against the weakest point of the front (Macdonald 9). It was defended by just twelve infantry divisions and four Calvary divisions, mounted on horse (Macdonald 9).. The British and French had imagined that the German attack would come through liege and Numar in begum, but…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carson Loewe 7th-8th hour Mr. Thorne 6, March, 2015 D-Day “When pressure mounts and strain increase everyone begins to the weakness in his make up. It is up to the commander to conceal his; above all to conceal, doubt, fear, and distrust,” General D Eisenhower once said. On June 6, 1944, the Allies made on amphibians, radical decisions to invade and attack Normandy. D-Day was the turning point in World War 2, although it would not have been possible without the help of General D. Eisenhower. General David Dwight Eisenhower was a strong republican war official; helping create some of the war plans for the ambitions attack on Normandy.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compromise: Overall Operational plan took element of each. Daytime landing with air support...but failed (FLAWED VICTORY)…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    D Day Failure Essay

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To be able to determine a time where D-Day failed, one must first be able to find outcomes that would result in said failure. One big variable that could have altered the win at Normandy would be the weather. The invasion, code named Overlord, was already running a day behind (Ambrose, 1). Storms scattered the beaches of Normandy, and without a clear sky, the troops would not have been successful. In fact, the outcome would have been horrendous: “Men trying to go ashore from…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is D-Day Deception

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Operation Quicksilver was invented to allow the Germans to think that this was the main part of the invasion that was to come. Since it was a direct route across the English channel into France it was made to think that the Allies would use this route since it had less obstacles to take to commence its invasion plans. This also had the Germans place more material that could have been used elsewhere to defend the original landing…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After postponing military operations for a month to allow the Allies time to build and gather the landing craft they would need to transport troops to the beaches of Normandy, Eisenhower set June 5, 1944 as D-Day, the date the Allies would invade the Germans in France. Time and weather were not on Eisenhower’s side. The weather forecast for June 5 was cloudy skies, rain, and turbulent seas. He had a very small window to coordinate the attack, as the tides would not favor another invasion for nearly two weeks, and in that amount of time the Germans could possibly learn of the plan. Eisenhower took a gamble with the weather. He postponed D-Day for one day, and the invasion took place on June 6, 1944. Utilizing over four thousand warships, almost ten thousand aircraft, and approximately one hundred sixty thousand troops, it was the largest amphibious invasion in the history of the world (“Eisenhower Decides on D-Day”). Though many Allied lives were lost, the invasion was a success, because Eisenhower was determined to defeat Nazi Germany, despite the…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good planning and leadership alone would not win this impending attack. Allied deception tactics would also aid the efforts of the Americans, British, and Canadians. Adolf Hitler and many other German leaders believed the assault would come in the Pas de Calais…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mission Command

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With German forces on the run following the Allied success at Normandy and the breakout and pursuit across France, Allied forces were staged to enter Germany in late summer 1944. Both Field Marshal Montgomery and General Bradley clamored to be given the priority of effort. General Eisenhower chose Montgomery’s Operation MARKET GARDEN as the plan for action. It called for airborne forces to open the route for a ground force to move more than sixty miles up a single road, ending up north of the Rhine River near Arnhem, Netherlands. By accomplishing this task, the German Ruhr industrial heartland would be within easy grasp. But the operation failed. The ground force did not make it to the last bridge; it was six more months before Allied forces crossed the Lower Rhine River near Arnhem. Between 17 and 26 September 1944, there were 17,000 Allied casualties including eighty percent of the 1st Airborne Division (UK). The historical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the British 1st Airborne Division lost the Battle of Arnhem because of poor planning. This paper will prove the failure of The Battle of Arnhem was not solely the fault of MG Roy Urquhart. Although this was his first command of such a division (being an "outsider") could he have not completed his wartime mission any better despite having inexperienced leaders planning airborne operations, bad intelligence, allowing the Air Force to plan the DZs based off what was best for the air movement plan and poor execution. This paper examines MG Urquhart, the commander of 1st Airborne Division (UK).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The successful Allied victories in Normandy during World War II forced the rival Germans to retreat to the Netherlands. These events enabled the Allied Forces to attempt the largest airborne operation in history Operation Market Garden in an attempt to make a final push to permanently defeat the Germans and end World War II. Unfortunately, this plan was destined to fail from the beginning. Overzealous leadership planning, limited logistical support, bad weather, and poor intelligence all being contributing factors to the failure…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gallipoli campaign was a good plan in theory but because of inaccurate intelligence the attacks never succeeded. If it succeeded as planned, the benefits of it would give the allies an enormous advantage over the…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was predicted that Belgium would not resist against a German invasion, and British intervention was completely unaccounted for. It was also assume that the capture of Paris would lead to the defeat of France. However, the success of the plan pivoted on the time Russia spent to…

    • 2283 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Battle of Passchendale

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b. British were afraid that the Russians were going to pull out soon so they had to attack soon before the German forces only had to focus on the western front…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite this there was evidence that some landing points were almost undefended yet the Allied troops dug in on the beaches and waited for the Turkish troops to arrive. There are many other examples of failures of military planning. Two whole military divisions were landed on the same beach within hours of each other in darkness sustaining massive casualties. Landings were made in the wrong locations, for example, next…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays