Like the “reverence to life”, which is a fundamental emotional attitude of awe and wonder toward living things. The biocentric viewpoint is a great viewpoint to follow when dealing with the environment, with some arguments on how this can harm an environment, like the naturalistic fallacy to Paul Taylors view. I do believe that this is a great viewpoint to follow, by the reverence for life view, with an opposition to it being, doesn’t life exists through the taking of life? The biocentric viewpoint, looks at how all life has moral standing. This can include anything from grass, all the way to an ape. One argument that agrees with all life has moral standing, is Paul Taylor’s biocentric egalitarianism viewpoint. The biocentric egalitarianism viewpoint looks at if a plant or animal has an objective good of its own, then the plant or animal has moral
Like the “reverence to life”, which is a fundamental emotional attitude of awe and wonder toward living things. The biocentric viewpoint is a great viewpoint to follow when dealing with the environment, with some arguments on how this can harm an environment, like the naturalistic fallacy to Paul Taylors view. I do believe that this is a great viewpoint to follow, by the reverence for life view, with an opposition to it being, doesn’t life exists through the taking of life? The biocentric viewpoint, looks at how all life has moral standing. This can include anything from grass, all the way to an ape. One argument that agrees with all life has moral standing, is Paul Taylor’s biocentric egalitarianism viewpoint. The biocentric egalitarianism viewpoint looks at if a plant or animal has an objective good of its own, then the plant or animal has moral