Preview

The Importance Of The Exclusionary Rule

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of The Exclusionary Rule
The exclusionary rule applies to evidence that has been collected in violation of an individual's Constitutional rights (Hall, 2014). The evidence that is collected during an illegal search or seizure could be found inadmissible during a trial. In 1914, the Supreme Court found that illegally obtained evidence would not be admissible in federal trials, it wasn’t until 1961, that states were also included in this ruling. The exclusionary rule is an attempt to prevent the police from violating an individual’s fundamental rights. There has been extensive debate regarding the exclusionary rule, moreover, it is important to note the rule has not been established into the Constitution. The main argument that surrounds the exclusionary rule is the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment
    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fourth Amendment

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case: US V. Calandra 1974
    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: US V. Calandra 1974

    In the case US v. Calandra (1974), Calandra was being questioned by the federal grand jury about loan sharking business. The reason the jury was asking these question were based on the evidence obtained at his company. Calandra didn’t want to answer any questions because he felt that the search of the company was an unlawful search and that it violated his fourth amendment exclusionary rule. The refusal to answer the grand jury, was what was being question about this case. Calandra felt like because of the exclusionary rule unde0r the fourth amendment he didn’t have to answer but he was wrong. The supreme court held that the exclusionary rule was only applicable in criminal courts and was not meant to be seen as a right but as a way to reduce unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by police ("Oyez: US v. Calandra," n.d.).…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief

    Constitution, protecting them against unreasonable search and seizures. The court rejected the defenses opinion, in that the weapons were seized due to a lawful search incident to arrest. The motion to suppress was denied because the court found that the officer had cause to believe the men were acting suspiciously, the seizer and question was warranted and the officers own right to safety had the right the pat down the suspects’ outer clothing, believing that the suspects may be…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Policing: Silverthorn Lumber Vs. United States
    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Constitutional Policing: Silverthorn Lumber Vs. United States

    Ohio we are instead dealing with state constitutional law and not on the federal level. On May 23, 1957 three officers arrived as a two family dwelling in which Miss. Mapp resided on the second floor with her daughter from a previous marriage. The police were at the residence in search of a person of interest in a recent bombing and information pertaining to the bombing. The police made illegal entry into Miss. Mapp’s home and with her in custody began to search her home. There were claims of excessive force and Miss. Mapp was not allowed to speak with her attorney whom was on scene when police entry was made. Evidence was collected from various locations around Miss. Mapp’s home and she was placed under arrest. Even at her trial no search warrant was produced nor was there an explanation as to why one could not be produced. The state of Ohio claimed even if the search were made without authority, or otherwise unreasonably, it is not prevented from using the unconstitutionally seized evidence at trial. (MAPP vs. OHIO, 1961) The state cited Wolf vs. Colorado in which the courts found “that in a prosecution in a State court for a State crime the Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure." (MAPP vs. OHIO, 1961) If the case had been tried in a federal court the evidence obtained in the search would not have been admissible, however since it was tried on the state level the exclusionary…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dollree Mapp Case Study
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dollree Mapp Case Study

    The court stated that the exclusionary rule also applies to states, meaning that states cannot use evidence gained by illegal means to convict someone. Clark argued that the Fourth Amendment strictly implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional. Furthermore this overturned the Wolf ruling, the Supreme Court had found that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against “police incursion into privacy” is incorporate if the right to privacy is incorporated. He also went on explaining the courts rationale based on the connection between the Fourth and the Fourteenth amendment when saying that since the Fourth amendment is a right of privacy and has been declared enforceable through the Fourteenth then it is enforceable against them by the same sanction of exclusion. The court believed that if the right to privacy stated in the Fourth amendment is valid with regard to action by the states they so should be exclusionary…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    Justice Black also believes the command that no unreasonable searches or seizures be allowed is too little to infer such a large decision. With these differences aside Justice Black feels that along with previous court decisions that the "Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches and seizures is considered together with the Fifth Amendment's ban against compelled self-incrimination, a constitutional basis emerges which not only justifies, but actually requires the exclusionary…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: A Case Study
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule: A Case Study

    The exclusionary rule prohibits illegally obtained evidence from being used in a criminal trial (Hall, 2015). Furthermore, the exclusionary rule applies to prevent unconstitutionally obtained evidentiary submissions, and the rule is applicable to items or confessions (Hall, 2015). After reviewing the exclusionary rule I feel it should be applied to illegal arrests too, unless the police obtain sufficient evidence independent of the illegal arrest. In the case of State v. Eserjose police made an illegal arrest of the defendant for second-degree burglary; however, during an interview the Mr. Eserjose was read his Miranda rights, and he chose to waive his rights, ultimately confessing to the burglary (Ma, 2013). Subsequently, Mr. Eserjose’s…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Befor Weeks V. United States
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule: Befor Weeks V. United States

    The definition of the exclusionary rule was a principle of law that illegally obtained evidence may not be admitted in court. The exclusionary rule was one of the few laws the court system had made to enforce the Forth Amendment’s unreasonable search and seizure clause. The many exceptions and alternatives to the rule caused major controversy over why the rule even stands.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Automobile Search Research Paper
    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Automobile Search Research Paper

    In Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 251, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 1803-04 (1991) the Supreme Court held that a criminal suspect's right to be free from unreasonable searches was not violated when, after he gave a police officer permission to search his car, the officer opened a dosed container found within the car. Consent to search a vehicle inherently encompasses the entire vehicle and its contents, including closed containers. Id. The scope of the search extends to any…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Case Study
    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule Case Study

    The exclusionary rule is intended to reject prove acquired disregarding a criminal litigant's Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment ensures against irrational quests and seizures by law requirement work force. On the off chance that the hunt of a criminal suspect is preposterous, the proof acquired in the pursuit will be rejected from trial.The exclusionary administer is a court-made run the show. This implies it was made not in statutes go by authoritative bodies but instead by the U.S. Incomparable Court. The exclusionary control applies in government courts by goodness of the Fourth Amendment. The Court has decided that it applies in state courts in spite of the fact that the due procedure condition of the Fourteenth Amendment.(The Bill of Rights—the…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule

    What the author intends to answer is what the exclusionary rule is and alternatives to the rule that potentially increase societal self-worth and positive reinforcement. This article explains to for the exclusionary rule, “it is a judge made rule of evidence, originated in 1914 by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. United States, which bars "the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure.(Wilkey, 216)” What surprises the reader is finding out that the exclusionary rule is not a rule required by the constitution. It is through…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Exclusionary Rule Be Abolished Essay
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Exclusionary Rule Be Abolished Essay

    Not that is not being done already but without the exclusionary rule the law enforcement officer wouldn’t need a warrant to invade that individual’s privacy. You will see allot of people’s rights being taken from them, the right to a fair trial, the right to have your privacy, basically shattering the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, stating the no person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law. To take away the exclusionary rule is like taking away someone’s freedom as well. If you are not safe to talk in your household without someone tapping your phone’s, or just invading your privacy. That is not freedom you’re a slave in your own home. Searching someone’s home without a warrant is why we absolutely need the rule, the evidence obtained in the search will be held against you without this rule. Therefore the criminal acts that they already were working towards putting against you have now been more than likely doubled, because the evidence they found will be presented in court and will go as counts to your sentence. You will be in prison because the officer’s or detectives invaded your privacy and got more evidence against you. I believe the exclusionary rule is a very good law, it gives the people there right to life,…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule

    In a landmark supreme court case, called the united states versus weeks, the supreme courts created a rule to our criminal procedure called the exclusionary rule. What the exclusionary rule means is that if the police obtain evidence against you in violation of your constitutional rights, they cannot use that evidence against you to prove your guilt or innocence at a trial. An example of this would be police searching your home without a search warrant. If they found illegal item in your home during that search, they could not be used against you at trial. Now the important thing to remember about the exclusionary rule, however, is that it does not mean you are automatically free to go. It only means that that particular piece of evidence is…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule
    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The U.S. Supreme Court developed the rule to discourage police from violating the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. A lot of police feel as when they have their badge on there able to do anything and everything which isn't fair to the everyday citizen.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More