Preview

Essay On Exclusionary Rule

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
548 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Exclusionary Rule
The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The U.S. Supreme Court developed the rule to discourage police from violating the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. A lot of police feel as when they have their badge on there able to do anything and everything which isn't fair to the everyday citizen. Reasons of why I support this statement is the exclusionary rule is such an amazing tool to use . The Forth Amendment is really an asset against unnecessary search and seizure. Instead of police and officers putting aside your constitutional rights if they're assuming you're guilty, they will instead have to work within the law to bring about …show more content…
By itself, however, it is not mentioned in the constitution. As a result, it is subject to arguments in court that erode its effectiveness. For example, there is no exclusionary rule when it comes to civil cases. In addition, people in deportation hearings do not have its protection either. There are also special circumstance situations where the exclusionary rule can be discarded. Knowing your rights, as a result will be very challenging as laws will change based on the state where you reside. Ultimately, having a firm understanding of your rights at a moment when you need to know may be the most challenging part of the exclusionary rule. Another reason to be against it is A lot of people dislike the exclusionary rule because it occasionally allows guilty people to go free. This is demonstrated the strongest in situations where the person is clearly guilty, but a mistake by detectives gets the person off on a technicality. While the exclusionary rule may help guilty people go free, it can also slow down the pace of an investigation, allowing for more crimes to be committed before a person can be brought to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I am usually one of those people that believes in the law and that believes that rules are in place for a reason. I am well aware of the Exclusionary Rule and the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine however, these are two things that I don't believe in. According to the Exclusionary Rule, any evidence obtained without a warrant or Constitutional justification needs to be excluded from any case records. (FindLaw, 2017). While the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine indicates that the court may exclude not only the evidence itself that was seized in violation of the Constitution but also any other evidence that was derived from the illegal search. (FindLaw, 2017). This doctrine allows for many criminals to be set free on a technicality. We are all well aware that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rules are included in the Fourth Amendment which is to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizure. As such, it prohibits police officers to use evidence…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1100 CJ 2012 05s Feb

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain the exclusionary rule and list the 6 major cases that define the rule. The exclusionary rule is a rule that prohibits the use of evidence or testimony obtained in violation of civil rights liberties and rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. The 6 major cases are Weeks vs. United States, Silverthorne Lumber co. vs. United States, Wolf vs. Colorado, Mapp vs. Ohio, Hudson vs. Michigan, Herring vs. United States.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary rule is a judicially created rule that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal prosecution (Sheb and Sheb 503). It became known in 1914 after a Supreme Court case Weeks vs United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the rule was rational because police cannot illegaly do searches and…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court & Exclusionary rule In the case of Davis v. The United States, the supreme court revisited the exclusionary rule to examine the law enforcement's method of obtaining evidence. The exclusionary rule also covers the Fifth Amendment, which protects against self-incrimination. As stated in lesson 4, “The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to prevent illegal police conduct and to penalize overzealous police officers for illegal searches and seizures” (Rio Salado College, n.d., Role of the Prosecutor and Alternatives to Prosecution). The rule protects individuals from unlawful government conduct and protects them from self-incrimination. The Supreme Court revisited the good faith exception where evidence obtained by law enforcement officers in reasonable reliance on a search warrant that is invalid could later be admissible in court.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. It is also a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the Fourth Amendment. Some exceptions of the exclusionary rule is barring the use at trial of evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful search and seizure. Some other exceptions to the exclusionary rule are: (1) a second, unpoisoned/untainted source had a major rule in finding the evidence, (2) the evidence would have been discovered…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The exclusionary rule is for prohibiting illegal evidence in court, this can be a deciding factor in most cases. An example of this is, they can’t fake, or plant evidence.They have to have solid concrete evidence.This rule is part of the fourth amendment, which a lot of people take seriously, these are rights given to all Americans. I agree with this because, everything needs to be done in a proper manner. If the evidence leaves the chain of custody or is collected in an unlawful manner this can be a deciding factor in the case and a guilty person can be set free. Also if anyone can come up with the evidence than an innocent person may be sentenced. So it better to do things the right way first.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Discuss the exclusionary rule and the following three related concepts: fruit of the poisoned tree, inevitable discovery exception, and the good faith exception.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    United States (1920) was an important case regarding exclusionary rule because it gave an extension to it. This case dealt with the Silverthorne Lumber Company. What happened in this case is that the two owners were arrested and while they were arrested the officers went into their office and without consent or a warrant to search and seize the premises they started to seize book, documents, and papers that were in the office. When the government was asked to return everything they obtained from the illegal search, they complied but they made copies of all the documents, books, and papers. With these new copies they tried to produce it as a new indictment. The ruling of this case like the Weeks v. US (1914) case was similar. The government could not use the knowledge gained from illegal evidence against the defendant. They also couldn't make a new indictment because of how the evidence was obtained. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was established in this case. This doctrine stated that evidence obtained illegally could not be admissible in court as evidence. So not only are individuals protected from illegal searches and seizures but so are…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Not being mean or anything, but in the first sentence of your post, you sounded like you were about to make a statement about the five external measures. Then going to rank civilian monitor as the most important without stating that you were going to rank one as the best measure. Before posting, take time to read your post to yourself to catch any possible error in your post. Beside grammar issue's, whats your take on the exclusionary rule, is it useful, or is it to problematic to law…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Exclusionary Rule was designed to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizures by law enforcement personnel. If the search of a criminal suspect is searched unreasonable, the evidence obtained in the search will be excluded from trial.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    The justices held that evidence seized on the basis of a mistakenly issued search warrant could be introduced at trial. The exclusionary rule, argued the majority, is not a right but a remedy justified by its ability to deter illegal police conduct. In Leon, the costs of the exclusionary rule outweighed the benefits. The exclusionary rule is costly to society: Guilty defendants go unpunished and people lose respect for the law. The benefits of the exclusionary rule are uncertain: The rule cannot deter police in a case like Leon, where they act in good faith on a warrant issued by a…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page

    Deterrence rationale is “the rationale for the exclusionary rule that rests upon the view that, to deter officers from disregarding the constitution, it is necessary to exclude from evidence at trail the evidentiary fruits of illegal police conduct.” (Garland, 2011,p.265) When it comes the applications for the exclusionary rule, “judges are not allowed to be accomplices to illegality by allowing the introduction of illegally obtained evidence.” (Garland, 2011,p.265) The courts have established what is called the “good faith exception” and this is where it was believed that the officers had probable cause to get a warrant.…

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defense Of Entrapment

    • 3337 Words
    • 14 Pages

    A more practical reason why the exclusionary rule is not good enough should be reason enough to discard such a rule. If a person was trapped in such gross unfairness, that he is innocent no doubt, but because he has been pressurized in such a way that he or she now believes that what he of she did was wrong, thus pleads guilty to that crime, the courts will have no option but to convict an innocent person. In this situation, the exclusionary rule cannot protect the accused, and an innocent person will be put away for no reason. For this reason, entrapment should be recognized as a…

    • 3337 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The general rule is that the parties are free to determine the terms of their own contract. A justified use of an exemption clause may arise in business, such as where a buyer of a product agrees to late delivery in exchange for a lower price, and the courts will not interfere with this. They will, however, be much less willing to enforce an exemption clause that has been imposed on a consumer without free negotiations. The courts and Parliament do not look favourably on exclusion clauses and have found various ways of limiting their effect.…

    • 4254 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays