Preview

The Importance Of Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Animal Testing
When picking out your personal care or cleaning products do you even stop to see what kind you are using? You could be supporting animal cruelty and not even know it. Today many household products are being tested on animals. Helpless and defenseless animals are being performed on for different types of experiments all around the world. Most of the things being performed in these labs you could never imagine one human being doing to another. I believe that animal testing should be illegal because it is inhumane, not very reliable, and is proved to be unnecessary.
Testing on animals is inhumane. One hundred million animals are killed for research each year in the United States alone. Animals such as mice, birds, rats, fish, frogs, dogs, monkeys,
…show more content…
In March, 2006, human volunteers were injected with a substance called TGN 1412, the experiment was created by TeGenero Immuno Therapeutics. As described by one of the scientist: “Within minutes, the human test subjects were writhing on the floor in agony. The compound was designed to dampen the immune response, but it had supercharged theirs, unleashing a cascade of chemicals that sent all six to the hospital. Several of the men suffered permanent organ damage, and one man’s head swelled up so horribly that British tabloids refer to the case as the ‘elephant man trial.” The same drug was first tested on animals and showed no side effects. This shows how animal testing is not just dangerous but very unreliable. Researcher Hans Ruesch adds that “approximately 15,000 new drugs are marketed every year, while some 12,000 are withdrawn. Animal testing may not be as accurate as it appears when it comes to the health of the American people.” According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “1.5 million Americans were hospitalized in a single year due to pharmaceutical drugs given to "cure" them. 30 percent of those hospitalized suffered further harm from the therapy they were …show more content…
Testing alternatives include: ‘in vitro test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures, computerized patient-drug databases and virtual drug trials, computer models and simulations, stem cell and genetic testing methods, non-invasive imaging techniques such as MRIs and CT Scans, and micro dosing.’ Synthetic skin has been designed and can provide a chemical determination in as little as 3 minutes to four hours, unlike animal testing that often takes two to four weeks. InVitro, another alternative test used to “measure the effectiveness of sunscreens and was reported to do in days what it takes animal studies months to do, and estimates that it can test five or six products for less than half the cost to study a single product in animals. The traditional testing of chemicals using animals can take up to five years per substance and cost millions of dollars, while non-animal alternatives can test hundreds of chemicals in a week for a fraction of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally Porter

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States fir various types of testing. These animals are used for scientific and commercial testing to develop medical treatments, determine toxicity of medications and chemicals, check the safety of products destined for human use and other biomedical or healthcare purposes. This testing on animals is cruel, inhumane and should be banned. It should be banned because the animals are held and live in inhumane conditions, it is harmful and at times lethal to the animals and there are other research method available that do not require animal testing.…

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” The chemicals that the people are using are burning or other worse things to them. The chemicals that they use on the animals could hurt or kill them. Over half of side effects cannot be detected in…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the conversation if animal testing is necessary. Whereas some are convinced that using animals for testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments, others maintain that these animals are very different from humans and, therefore, make poor test subjects. My own view is these animals have produced many treatments, but not outcomes that are effective enough in the human body, therefore should not be using animals.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal testing has been around for centuries, when it really should be one of those “cruel memories” of things we have done in the past, but will not let in happen again in the future. Rats, Mice, Rabbits, and a whole slew of other animals are forced to endure massive quantities of testing substances or endure pain by having harmful chemicals applied to their bodies, even though the testing may…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is an expression that the vast majority has heard yet is maybe still uncertain of precisely what is included. Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it alludes to the experimentation completed on creatures. It is utilized to survey the wellbeing and adequacy of everything from medicine to beautifying agents, and also seeing how the human body functions. While supporters trust it is a vital practice, those contradicted to creature testing trust that it includes the torment and Suffering of Animals.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The UDSA reported that in 2010 that there was 97,123 animals that went through pain during experiments and weren’t given anaesthesia for pain relief (“Should animals”). A former Maryland secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene, Martin Wasserman has said “Animals used in chemical testing-always alive and fully concencious-are never given pain relief (“Is animal”). Though, it has been argued that animal testing is better than putting human lives in danger. However, even though products or drugs have been tested on animals it doesn’t work on people. Neurologist Aysha Akktar has said that would about more than 100 stroke drugs that passed animal trials have failed to work on humans (“Should animals”). Proceeding of the National Academy of sciences in the United States studied that around 150 human tests have failed even though it was tested on animals (“Should animals”). In addition to suffering and deaths animals go through the results of animal and human clinics can have different…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Human Society International it states that 9/10 candidate medicines that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans. This shows that every 10 experiments done on animals only 1 will work. This also shows that animals are being killed even if the experiment doesn’t work. In the UK an estimated 70,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs. All these drugs have passed animal tests (Human Society International). This shows that animal testing isn’t reliable if the medicines that are approved are killing people who are taking them. This is important because if the medicines are killing people that have been tested on animals, their should be a new way to make sure they’re safe.This shows that animal testing is useless and there should be another way to make sure drugs are safe before giving them to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, there are alternatives to animal testing that can effectively test the safety of different products before they are tested on humans. “Human clinical trials and epidemiological studies, human tissue- and cell-based research methods, cadavers, sophisticated high-fidelity human patient simulators and computational models are more reliable, more precise, less expensive, and more humane than animal experiments,” (Berlatsky). Through the use of alternative testing methods, scientists can save money, and the lives of animals, all while producing more accurate test results. “We can now test irritancy on protein membranes, produce and test vaccines using human tissue, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples instead of killing rabbits,” (Berlatsky). New technology allows scientists to grow sheets of human skin in labs, products can now technically be tested on humans without the possible danger that comes along with traditional testing. Animal experimentation is now not only cruel, but also obsolete. “Epidemiology, cell culture experiments, and human clinical studies, as well as recent advances in in silico biology (computational modeling), are all better suited to efficiently and safely uncovering the cause of a disease and its treatment than is animal experimentation,” (Hunnicutt). Not only are these new ways of testing more humane, but they are also more accurate. As discussed in the prior paragraph, animal experimentation is not always reliable. With cell culture experiments and human clinical trials, scientists can see how products affect humans right away, without having to go through the trouble of testing the products on animals. With all the new technology available to scientists, there’s reason for animal experimentation to continue. The continuous abuse lab animals suffer is unnecessary and unreasonable, there’s no reason that animal experimentation…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever had a pet or an animal that you loved? Now imagine them in pain and there is nothing they can do about it. That is what animal testing is. Many skin care and product companies do animal testing and you may be using those products everyday. Popular Companies include: Estee Lauder, Clinique, Victoria Secret, and many more. We should not use animal testing as a way to test out possibly harmful products to humans because it is an inhumane and cruel treatment of animals - it is not fair to the animals who are helpless and at the mercy of the testors; and the animals do not have a say in whether or not they approve of it. Millions of animals die each year due to the cruelty put upon them by the skin care and product companies. Animal testing should not be used because it’s inaccurate and cruel to animals.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyday animals have to endue torture and agony people put them through because of animal testing. Whether it is for medical research or for cosmetic testing they are subjected to bleed, being burned, blinded, or become deceased. Sometimes these animals are put through this for the most arbitrary reasons such as makeup remover and eyeliner. The use of animal testing is cruel, ineffective, and a waste of money.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some medications are not necessarily safe for humans even if it provides positive results in animals. In 950, there was a pill called the sleeping pill that caused 10,000 babies to be brought into this world with severe deformities which was tested prior to it’s commercial release. Another drug called Vioxx which is a arthritis medication showed that it provided a protective effect on an animal’s heart, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before it was finally pulled off the market. Rezulin or as some know it as troglitazone was approved by the FDA in 1997. The drug was intended to treat adult onset type 2 diabetes. Rezulin did indeed lower the blood sugar pressure in rats without negative effects, but later the animals reportedly began to have severe and sometimes fatal liver failure. The medication still hit the market and was not withdrawn until 2000 after it causes more than 400 deaths, but only because Los Angeles Times did an intensive investigation which caused them to change their label four times. Despite, all the drugs out there that has caused harm to humans animal testing still continues. Can you imagine all the drugs that could have helped the people in the world if we were actually able to get relevant results. Results that are actually beneficial and 100% guaranteed to work for humans. The percentage rate of a medication to actually been effective on humans is extremely low. 10% that is the percent we are suppose to rely on; the percentage that is used to predict a cure for diseases. Even the supposed animals that best replicate to us can still give us false results. For example, TGN1412 was tested on monkeys, rats, and rabbits and the results were positive for the medication to work, but in the human clinical trials, the subjects began to scream in agony. The drug was suppose to increase the immune responses to a virus, but instead it…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Massachusetts Animals Rights Coalition entitled, “Vivisection: Outdated, Cruel, and Unnecessary” It is estimated that at least 500 million animals suffer in labs throughout the United States. Animals testing is cruel and inhumane and does nothing for the well being of the animal. Also the testing of animals is not very accurate, according to the differences in the genetic makeup between animals and humans. In addition too, there are more alternatives than to test on helpless animals. With all the disadvantages and alternatives out there, animal testing should be banned.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Is Cruel

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the first place, testing animals is harsh and wrong. Some experiments involves force feeding animals, water deprivation, and forced inhalations. Also when animals are being tested they have to suffer from excruciating pain during experiments. Which is very wrong to leave them suffering from testing a drug that could also kill them. Yet, there’s test where about 50% of animals that have…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays