Preview

The Immortality of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2893 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Immortality of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo
Dao Le
Prof. Mark Cronin
HU 102 - HD
April 2, 2012
The Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo Among Plato’s dialogues, which serve to honor the realm of philosophy in general and Socrates’s life in particular, the Phaedo dramatically and poignantly portrays the death scene of Socrates. The Phaedo evokes such tragic sentiments of pity and fear while at the same time glorifies Socrates as the martyr for the truth. He dies because of human’s injustice yet faces his own death with extraordinary serenity and fearlessness; he devotes his whole life for philosophy and in fact practices it until the last minutes. In this dialogue, the philosophical discussion is about the soul. However, as a dualist, for the most part Socrates takes for granted the existence of the soul while arguing for the immortality of the soul, which eventually turns to a conclusion that the soul does survive the death of the body and it is immortal. On the opening of the Phaedo, Socrates’s readiness to die and his astounding composure before his death utterly surprise both his friends and the audience: “the man appeared happy in both manner and words as he died nobly and without fear” (Plato 58e). As Cicero says, Socrates at his death “spoke in language which made him seem not as one thrust out to die but as one ascending to the heavens” (Ahrensdorf 1). The reason he acts in such fearless manner lies in his hope and belief in the afterlife: “I should be wrong not to resent dying if I did not believe that I should go first to other wise and good gods, and then to men who have died and are better than men are here” (Plato 63b). He strongly believes in a realm we’d basically call heaven, which is populated by gods and other philosophical kindred souls. He wishes to enjoy the company of wise gods and good men in a better political community in the afterlife, and accordingly he is of good hope that there is something for the departed and that, as is said of old, it is much better for the good



Cited: Ahrensdorf, Peter. The Death of Socrates and the Life of Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995. Print. Bostock, David. Plato 's Phaedo. Oxford New York: Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, 1986. Print. Gallop, David, and Plato. Plato: Phaedo. Oxford [u.a.: Clarendon, 1998. Print. Kagan, Shelly. Arguments for the existence of the soul, Part IV; Plato, Part I. 2011. Video. Yale University, 2011. Plato. Five Dialogues. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 2002. Print. Sedley, David. “Platonic Causes.” Phronesis, Vol. 43, No. 2 (May, 1998), pp. 114-132. Web. 10 April 2012. White, David. Myth and Metaphysics in Plato 's Phaedo. Selinsgrove Pa.: Susquehanna University Press, 1989. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the section of immortal souls I learned that Socrates believe that the soul would never die. People saw him with craziness. They told him that how was it possible if it had not…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even with the anticipation of death linguring in his path, Socrates remained composed and curious. During his defense, he made it clear that death was nothing to fear, but rather an accepted inevitability of life. “Those of us who think that death is an evil are in error”(Plato, 39). Instead of viewing his sentence as a burden, Socrates regarded it as a potential opportunity. If death was the soul 's journey to another place, the possibilities could be endless. He could obtain a considerable amount of knowledge by conversing with...…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates believes that the “souls of the dead in the underworld” come from people who are living today and that the “living souls come back of those from the dead.”…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prince, Brian D. "The Form of Soul in the Phaedo." PLATO, The electronic Journal of the International Plato Society (2011. ): 1-3. Accessed 23 August 2013.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this paper, I will evaluate Socrates’ argument from Phaedo for why philosophers should desire death, perhaps only secondly to wisdom. I will argue that Socrates unfairly characterizes the truthfulness of the senses, and therefore projects a pessimistic view of the philosopher’s virtue during life. This pessimism towards life in conjunction with arguments for an afterlife that liberates reason, seems to suggest that Socrates believes philosophers should desire death: a happy prospect for condemned man, but perhaps a biased one.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' Apology

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though this reading is old it still carries great value and importance because it shows that knowledge as Socrates argues is not ours but it belongs to God. Hence, Socrates’ work will continue even after his death “For the word which I will speak is not mine.” It reminds me of Jesus Christ, which story is similar to Socrates’. They both followed a divined forced rather than their own interests and hence both didn’t have a sign of this divine force until the very end. However, their end, death, might seem a negative end to others but the opposite was for both Socrates’ and Jesus’ point of view. Furthermore, their deaths didn’t stop the work they were doing and were accused of but it rather intensified it, making other to seek same path or belief.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates World Views

    • 1543 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates first brings to light his view of death in the Apology when he states, “Death is one of two things. Either it is annihilation, and the dead have no consciousness of anything; or, as we are told, it is really a change: a migration of the soul from this place to another.” (Apology 40c). At this point, Socrates does not give any definitive answer as to whether death is annihilation or the migration of the soul; rather, he argues that it does not really matter. He explains why both options are favorable, by comparing annihilation to, “a dreamless sleep” (Apology 40d) and stating that if the soul migrates, the dead spend their time with “demigods that were upright in their earthly life” (Apology 41a).…

    • 1543 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates The Afterlife

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates’ view of the afterlife is a little difficult to assess due to the fact that there are not actual written works by Socrates. The only works about him are by other people. Socrates view of death came up in a conversation when asked by Cebes about the poetry he was working on. The discussion starts with the question suicide. Socrates thesis was “the one aim of those who practice philosophy in the proper manner is to practice for dying and death”. He also defines death as the separation of body and soul. All this lead to Socrates conclusion about death which is, upon dying a philosopher is most likely to obtain the wisdom which he has been seeking his whole life. Socrates also had an interesting view of the afterlife. Since “being dead” and “being alive” are opposite states, and “dying” and “coming-to-life” are the two opposite processes between these states, coming-to-life must balance out dying. Socrates also recalled an ancient theory basis just as the souls of the dead in the underworld come from those living in this world; the living souls come back from those of the dead. He concluded that everything that dies must come back to life again. Socrates made a strong argument with valid points that cannot be dismissed. If the two opposite processes did not balance each other out, everything would eventually be in the same state: for example, if increase did not balance out decrease, everything would keep becoming smaller and smaller. Another prime example…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crito, By Socrates

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates was a classical Greek philosopher who is accredited as the main source of establishing the fundamentals of modern Western philosophy and logic. He is notably known for creating the Socratic method, Socratic irony and contributing to the field of ethics. Socrates was ahead of his time as he established an ethical system based on logos, human reason, rather than mythos, theological doctrine. This change from fables claiming divine warrant, to the pursuit of knowledge of central concepts and values based on reasoned arguments, is what cost Socrates his life. However, according to Socrates, death is not an entity that should be feared or avoided, as death is the separation of body and soul to which the soul then travels to an afterlife.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People fear to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good.” Throughout the history of mankind, man has been fascinated with the mystery surrounding death. For many it is a phenomenon which is feared and for others it is a salvation from the misery and suffering of everyday life. In Plato’s “Apology”, Socrates has been sentenced to death and he claims that what “has befallen me is a blessing.” After the conclusion of his trial, he explains that there are two possible outcomes to death. Either death is a final end to one’s existence, or one dies and transcends to an eternal afterlife. Socrates says either outcome would be a “good thing.” If there is no life after death then death would be like sleeping with no dreams or interruptions. It would be the most peaceful and sound sleep you could experience. He says that eternity would be like one night’s sleep and that one night would be the equivalent of all the nights and days you had experienced until that point. You would no longer have to experience the pain of everyday life. And if there were life after death, it would be beneficial to you because you could meet and question great figures of history. He would be able to continue to examine and question the greatest people in history and continue to seek those who are wise. So Socrates invites death on himself and welcomes it. After arguing the two aforementioned points, he further justifies the premise that death is good by explaining that death will finally “rid him of all of his troubles.” This means his sufferings in life to include suffering from the ailments of old age will cease. He also explains that he does not fear death and could have paid a fine to avoid the death penalty. However, he refuses to abandon his principles and states that to abandon his…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Plato, Crito, Trans. Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive. Web Atomic. Web. 4 Feb. 2014…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: CONFORD, F. M., trans. Plato and Parmenides: Parmenides’ Way of Truth and Plato’s Parmenides, Bobbs- Merrill Company Inc. Indianapolis, N. Y. 1957.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays